VISUALIZATION AND MEASUREMENT OF A NARROW-CONE DI GASOLINE SPRAY FOR THE IMPINGEMENT ANALYSIS

  • Park, J.S. (Mechanical Engineering Dept. Wayne State University) ;
  • Im, K.S. (Mechanical Engineering Dept. Wayne State University) ;
  • Kim, H.S. (Mechanical Engineering Dept. Wayne State University) ;
  • Lai, M.C. (Mechanical Engineering Dept. Wayne State University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

Wall interactions of direct injection spray were investigated using laser-sheet imaging, shadowgraphy, wetted footprint and phase Doppler interferometry techniques. A narrow-cone high-pressure swirl injector is used to inject iso-octane fuel onto a plate, which has three different impact angles inside a pressurized chamber. Heated air and plate conditions were compared with unheated cases. Injection interval was also varied in the heated case to compare dry- and wet- wall impingement behaviors. High-speed macroscopic Mie-scattering images showed that presence of wall and air temperature has only minor effect on the bulk spray structure and penetration speed for the narrow-cone injector tested. The overall bulk motions of the spray plume and its spatial position at a given time are basically unaffected until a few millimeters before impacting the wall. The surface properties of the impact surface, such as the temperature, the presence of a preexisting liquid film also have a small effect on the amount of wetting or the wetted footprint; however, they have strong influence on what occurs just after impact or after a film is formed. The shadowgraph in particular shows that the plate temperature has a significant effect on vapor phase propagation. Generally, 10-20% faster horizontal vapor phase propagation is observed along the wall at elevated temperature condition. For impingement onto a preexisting film, more splash and evaporation were also observed. Contrary to some preconceptions, there is no significant splashing and droplet rebounding from surfaces that are interposed in the path of the DI gasoline spray, especially for the oblique impact angle cases. There also appears to be a dense spray front consists of large sac spray droplets in the oblique impact angle cases. The bulk of the spray is not impacted on the surface, but rather is deflected by it The microscopic details as depicted by phase Doppler measurements show that the outcome of the droplet impaction events can be significantly influenced. Only droplets at the spray front have high enough Weber numbers for wall impact to wet, splash or rebound. Using the sign of vertical velocity, the time-resolved downward droplets and upward droplets are compared. The Weber number of upward moving droplets, which seldom exceeds unity, also decreases as the impact angle decreases, as the droplets tend to impact less and move along the wall in the deflected spray plume.

Keywords

References

  1. Bai, C. and Gosman, A. D. (1995). Development of methodology for spray impingement simulation. SAE Paper No. 950283
  2. Bai, C. and Gosman, A. D. (1996). Mathematical modelingof wall films formed by impinging sprays. SAE PaperNo. 960626
  3. Habchi, C., Foucart, H. and Baritaud, T. (1999). Influenceof the Wall temperature on the mixture preparation indi gasoline engines. Oil & Gas Science andTechnology Review, IFP, 54, 2, 211-222 https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:1999017
  4. Han, Z., Xu, Z. and Trigui, N. (2000). Spray/Wall interactionmodels for multidimensional engine simulation, Int. J.of Engine Research 1,1, 127-146 https://doi.org/10.1243/1468087001545308
  5. Li, J., Matthews, R. D., Stanglmaier, R. H., Roberts, C. E.and Anderson, R. W. (1999). Further experiments on theeffects of in-cylinder wall wetting on HC emissionsfrom direct-injection gasoline Engines. SAE Paper No.1999-01-3661
  6. Mundo, C., Sommerfeld, M. and Tropea, C. (1994).Experimental studies of the deposition and splashingof small liquid droplets impinging on a flat surface.ICLASS-94, Rouen, France, July 1994
  7. Naber, J. and Reitz, R. D. (1988). Modeling engine spray/wall impingement. SAE Paper No. 880107
  8. Nagaoka, M., Kawazoe, H. and Nomura, N. (1994).Modeling fuel spray impingement on a hot wall forgasoline engines. SAE Paper No. 940525
  9. Nishida, K., Min, J., Yoshida, H. and Hiroyasu, H.(1990). Computed tomographic study on the internalstructure of a diesel spray impinging on a flat wall JSME International Journal 57, 537, 362-368
  10. Obert, E. F. (1973). Internal Combustion Engines and AirPollution. Harper & Row. New York
  11. Park, J., Xie, X., Im, K.-S., Kim, H. and Lai, M.-C.(1999). Characteristics of direct injection gasoline spray wall impingement at elevated temperature conditions. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3772
  12. Plackmann, J. D., Kim, J. and Ghandhi, J. B. (1998). Theeffects of mixture stratification on combustion in aconstant-volume combustion vessel. SAE Paper No.980159
  13. Senda, J., Ohnishi, M., Takahashi, T., Fujimoto, H., Utsunomiya, A. and Wakatabe, M. (1998). Measurement and modeling on wall wetted fuel film profile and mixture preparation in intake manifold for SI engine. SAE Paper No. 1998-01-0798
  14. Senecal, P. K., Stanton, D. W., Reitz, R, D. and Rutland, C. J.(1998). . The 11$11^{th}$ AnnuaIConference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems,ILASS-America, May 17-20, 1998, Sacramento,California
  15. Stanglmaier, R. H., Li, J. and Matthews, R. D. (1999).The effect of in-cylinder wall wetting location on the HC emissions from SI engines. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0502
  16. Stanton, D. W. and Rutland, C. J., Modeling fuel filmformation and wall interaction in diesel engines. SAEPaper No. 960628
  17. Stevens, E. and Steeper, R. (2001). Piston wetting in anoptical DISI engine: fuel films, Poolfires, and sootgeneration. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-1203
  18. Wirth, M., Piock, W. F., Fraidl, G. K., Schoeggl, P. andWinklhofer, E. (1998). Gasoline DI engines: thecomplete system approach by interaction of advanceddevelopment tools. SAE Paper No. 980492
  19. Yoo, J.-H., Kim, S.-K., Zhao, F. Q., Lai, M. C. and Lee,K. S. (1998). Visualization of direct-injection gasolinespray and wall-impingement inside a motoring engine.SAE Paper No. 982702
  20. Zhao, F.-Q., Lai, M.-C. and Harrington, D. (1995). Thespray characteristics of automotive port injection-acritical review. J. Fuels & Lubricants 104,3, 399-432,SAE Paper No. 950506
  21. Zhao, F.-Q., Lai, M.-C. and Harrington, D. L. (1999).Mixture dynamics and combustion control strategies inspark-ignited direct injection gasoline engines. Prog.in Energy and Comb. Sci., 25, 437-562 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00004-0
  22. Zhao, F.-Q., Lai, M.-C. and Harrington, D. L. (1997). AReview of mixture preparation and combustion controlstrategies in spark-ignited direct injection gasolineengines. J. Engine 106, 3, 861-904, SAE Paper No.970627
  23. Zulo, J. R. and Chigier N. (1991). Impinging diesel spraydynamics. Atomization and Sprays, 1, 303-318 https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v1.i3.40