대한안전경영과학회지 (Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science)

  • 제6권2호
  • /
  • Pages.177-186
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1229-6783(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1484(eISSN)
대한안전경영과학회 (Korea Safety Management & Science)
권호 표지

엔트로피 방법에 의한 다 요소 의사결정에 관한 연구

On the Multi-attribute Decision Making by Entropy Methods

  • 정순석 (충주대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Decision analysis has becomes an important technique for decision making in the face of uncertainty. It is characterized by enumerating all the available courses of action, identifying the payoffs for all possible outcomes, and quantifying the subjective probabilities for the all possible random events. When the data are available, decision analysis becomes a powerful tool for determining an optimal course of action. We study the multi-attribute decision making in a compensatory models. In this paper, we use the entropy methods in weights calculating. For the purpose of making optimal decision, the data of five different car models are used. For computing, we used Visual Numerica Version 1.0 software package.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 정순석, 이종일, (2001), '다 요소 의사결정에 관한 연구' 충주대 대학원 논문집 제2집, pp.101111
  2. 이강인, (1996), '선호 종속으로 허용하는 다 속성 의사결정문제의 대화형 접근방법의 개발', 동국대학교 대학원 산업공학과, 박사학위 논문
  3. Ashton, R. H.,(1980), Sensitivity of Multiattribute Decision Models to Alternative Specifications of Weighting Parameters, Journal of Business Research, Vol.8, No.3, pp. 341359
  4. Bana e Costa, C. A., (Eds) (1990), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, New York
  5. Barron, F. H., and Barrett, B. E.,(1996), Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights, Management Science, Vol. 42, No.11, pp. 1515-1523
  6. D. E., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., (1977), Confliction Objective in Decisions, John Wiley & Sons
  7. Borcherding, K., Eppel. T., and Von Winterfeldt, D.,(1991), Comparison of Weighting Judgements in Multiattribute Utility Measurement. Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 16031619
  8. Canada, J. R., and Sullivan, W. G., (1989), Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems. Prentice Hall, N. J.
  9. Cogger, K. O., and Yu. P. L., (1985), Eigenweight Vectors and Least-Distance Approximation for Revealed Preference in Pairwise Weight Ratios, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 483-491
  10. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L., (1982), Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications, John Wiley & Sons
  11. Hobbs, B. F., (1982), A Comparison of Weighting Methods in Power Plant Siting, Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No.4, pp. 725737
  12. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K., (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications : A state-of-The-Art Survey, New York : Springer-Verlag
  13. Olson, D. L., (1996), Decision Aids for Selection Problems, New York : Springer -Verlag
  14. Saaty, T. L., (1977), A scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 234281
  15. Schoemaker, P. J. H., and Waid, C. C., (1982), An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models, Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 182196
  16. Soofi, E. S., (1990), Generalized Entropy-based Weight for Multiattribute Models, Operations Research, 32(2), pp. 362363
  17. Steuer, R. E., (1986), Multiple Criteria Optimization : Theory, Computation, and Application, John Wiley & Sons
  18. Weber, M., and Borcherding, K., (1993), Behavioral Influences on Weight Judgements in Multi Attribute Decision Making, European Journal of Operational Research, 67. pp. 112
  19. Zeleny, M., (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, New York : McGrow-Hill