Stomatal and Photosynthetic Responses of Betula Species Exposed to Ozone

오존에 노출된 자작나무류의 기공개폐와 광합성 반응

  • 이재천 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 김장수 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 한심희 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 김판기 (서울대학교 기초과학연구원)
  • Published : 2004.03.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the relationship of stomatal responses, photosynthesis, and intercellular $CO_2$ concentration( $C_{i}$) of Betula Species to ozone exposure. Five Betula Species(B. costata, B. davurica, B. schmidtii, B. platyphylla var, iaponica and B, ermani) were grown in the greenhouse. One-year-old potted seedlings of the five Betula Species were exposed to ozone(100 pub) for 8 hours da $y^{-1}$ for 5 weeks in a fumigation chamber. Net photosynthesis was significantly different among species and treatments from early in the period of the fumigation. Stomatal conductance and transpiration rate differences among species and treatments became significant after three weeks of fumigation. $C_{i}$ was significantly different only among treatments; $C_{i}$ of four species, except for B. davurica, was higher than that of control plants. Carboxylation efficiency and photo-respiration rate were significantly different among species or treatments; carboxylation efficiency and photo-respiration rate of the five Betula Species were decreased by ozone treatment. It was concluded that stomatal closure of Betula Species may be the result of the reduction of photosynthesis and rubisco activity and the resulting increase of $C_{i}$. The higher $C_{i}$ likely resulted from reduced photosynthesis because of physiological processes.ocesses.

본 연구는 오존에 노출된 자작나무류의 기공 반응, 광합성 및 내부 $CO_2$ 농도 변화간의 연관성을 밝히고자 수행하였다. 거제수나무, 물박달나무, 박달나무, 자작나무, 사스래나무는 온실에서 양묘하여 포트로 옮겨 심고, 100ppb의 오존 농도에서 하루 8시간씩 5주 동안 오존에 노출시켰다. 순광합성은 오존 노출 초기부터 수종간, 처리간 차이가 있었으나, 기공전도도와 증산량은 오존 처리 3주 후부터 수종간, 처리간 차이가 있었다. 내부 $CO_2$ 농도는 수종간 차이가 없었으나, 처리간 차이는 크게 나타났으며, 물박달나무를 제외한 4개 수종의 내부 $CO_2$ 농도는 오존 처리구가 대조구보다 높았다. 탄소고정효율과 광호흡속도는 수종간 또는 처리간에 큰 차이를 나타냈으며, 모든 수종에서 대조구보다 오존 처리구가 낮았다. 자작나무류는 장기적인 오존 노출로 광합성과 관련된 rubisco 활성이 감소하여, 내부 $CO_2$ 농도가 증가하면서 기공이 eke히는 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, N. R., G. Nie, and M. Tomasevic, 1994: Responses of photosynthetic light-use efficiency and chloroplast development on exposure of leaves to ozone. Plant Responses to the Gaseous Environment, R. G. Alscher and A. R. Wellbum (Eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, 219-238.
  2. Bortier, K., K. Vandermeiren, L. De Temmerman, and R. Ceulemans, 2001: Growth, photosynthesis and ozone uptake of young beech(Fagus sylvatica L.) in response to different ozone exposures. Trees 15, 75-82.
  3. Chappelka, A. H. and B. I. Chevone, 1992: Tree responses to ozone. Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation, A. S. Lefohn, (Eds.), Chelsea, Lewis Publishers. Inc., 271-323.
  4. Dann, M. S. and E. J. Pell, 1989: Decline of activity and quantity of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and net photosynthesis in ozone-treated potato foliage. Plant Physiology 91, 427-432.
  5. Darrall, N. M., 1989: The effect of air pollutants on physiological processes in plants. Plant Cell and Environment 12, 1-30.
  6. Farquhar, G. D. and T. S. Sharkey, 1982: Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 11, 539-552.
  7. Farquhar, G. D., S. von Caemmerer and J. A. Berry, 1980: A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78-90
  8. Grandjean, A. and J. Fuhrer, 1989: Growth and leaf senescence in spring wheat(Triticum aestivum) grown at different ozone concentration in open-top field chambers. Physiologia Plantarum 77, 389-394
  9. Hill, A. C. and N. Littlefield, 1969: Effects of ozone on apparent photosynthesis, rate of transpiration and stomatal closure in plants. Environmental Science and Technology 3, 52-56
  10. Lee, J. C., I. S. Kim, J. K. Yeo and Y. B. Koo, 2001: Comparing of clonal sensitivity of Populus deltoides to atmospheric ozone with use of visible foliar injury. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 90(1), 10-18
  11. Lee, J. C., S. H. Han, C. S. Kim and S. S. Jang, 2002: Visible foliar injuries and growth responses of four Betula sp. exposed to ozone. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 4(1), 29-37
  12. Lee, J. S. and B. W. Kim, 1997: Stomatal response by ozone. Korean Journal of Ecology 20(2), 83-94
  13. Lehnherr, B., A. Grandjean, F. M chler and J. Fuhrer, 1987: The effect of ozone in ambient air on ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxyenase activity decreases photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat. journal of Plant Physiology 130, 198-200
  14. Lippert, M., K. Steiner, H.-D. Payer, S. Simons, C. Langebartels and H. Sandermann Jr., 1996: Assessing the impact of ozone on photosynthesis of European beech(Fagus sylvatica L.) in environmental chambers. Trees 10, 268-275
  15. Matyssek, R., M. S. Guthardt-Goerg, T. Keller and C. Scheidegger, 1991: Impairment of gas exchange and structure in birch leaves(Betula pendula) caused by low ozone concentrations. Trees 5, 5-13 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225329
  16. Morison, J. I. I., 1987: Intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal response to CO2. Stomatal Function, E. Zeiger, G. D. Farquhar and I. R. Cowan (Eds.), Stanford, California, 229-251
  17. Mortensen, L. and O. Skre, 1990: Effects of low ozone concentrations on growth of Betula pubscens Ehrh., Betula verrucosa Ehrh. and Alnus incana (L.) Moench. New Phytologist 115, 165-170
  18. Musselman, R. C., P. M. McCool and A. S. Lefohn, 1994: Ozone descriptors for an air quality standard to protect vegetation. Journal of Air Waste Management 44, 1383-1390
  19. Oksanen. E., G. Amores, H. Kokko, J. M. Santamaria and L. Karenlampi, 2001: Genotypic variation in growth and physiological responses of Finish hybrid aspen(Populus trennlogical P.tremula) to elevated tropospheric ozone concentration. Tree Physiology 21, 1171-1181
  20. Paakkonen, E., j. Vahala, T. Holopainen, R. Karjalainen and L. Karenlampi 1996: Growth responses and related biochemical and ultrastructural changes of the photosynthetic apparatus in birch(Betula pendula) saplings exposed to low con concentrations of ozone. Tree Physiology 16, 597-605
  21. Paakkonen, E., T. Holopainen and L. Karenlampi, 1995: Ageing-related anatomical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of birch (Betula pendula Roth) clones as affected by low ozone exposure. Annals of Botany 75, 285-294 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1023
  22. Pye, J. M., 1988: Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 17, 347-360
  23. Raschke, K., 1976: How stomata resolve the dilemma of opposing priorities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 273, 551-560
  24. Reich, P. B. and R. G. Amundson, 1985: Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230, 566-570
  25. Reich, P. B., A. W. Schoettle and R.G. Amundson, 1985: Effects of low concentrations of O3, leaf age and water stress on leaf diffusive conductance and water use efficiency in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 63, 58-64
  26. Ro, H.-M., P.-G. Kim, I.-B. Lee, M.-S. Yiem and S.-Y. Woo, 2001: Photosynthetic characteristics and growth responses of dwarf apple(Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Fuji) saplings after 3 years of exposure to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and temperature. Trees 15, 195-203
  27. Sanders, G. E., J. J. Colls and A. G. Clark, 1992: Physiological changes in Phaseolus vulgaris in response to long-term ozone exposure. Annals of Botany 69, 123-133
  28. Saxe, H. and N. S. Murali, 1989: Diagnostic parameters for selecting against novel spruce(Picea abies) decline: III. Response of photosynthesis and transpiration to O3 exposures. Physiologia Plantarum 76, 356-361
  29. Temple, P. J. and G. H. Riechers, 1995: Nitrogen allocation in ponderosa pine seedlings exposed to interacting ozone and drought stresses. New Phytologist 130, 97-104
  30. Temple, T. J., 1986: Stomatal conductance and transpirational responses of field-grown cotton top ozone. Plant Cell and Environment 9, 315-321
  31. Unsworth, M. H. and V. J. Black, 1981: Stomatal response to pollutant. Stomatal Physiology, P. E. Jarvis and T. A. Mansfield (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 187-203