산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.93-102
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지

공정성요인구조에 관한 실증적 연구

An empirical study on the factor structure of justice

  • 이광희 (금오공과대학교 산업경영학과) ;
  • 이철기 (한국기술교육대학교 산업경영학부)
  • 발행 : 2004.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In recent several studies, interactional justice as well as distributional justice and procedural justice was founded as a important factor of justice. But the other studies proposed that interactional justice was a sub-dimension of procedural justice because of a very close correlation between two factors. So there are mixed point of view of the factor structure of justice. In this study, we examined the factor structure of justice using confirmative factor analysis. We hypothesized that the facto, structure of justice would be divided into three factors; distributional justice, procedural justice and interactional justice. The results of empirical study supported these hypotheses. The results of this study suggest that interactional justice should be regarded as a important factor of justice to analyze the justice and the relationship with justice and related variables more accurately.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이순묵, [공변량구조분석], 성원사, 1990
  2. Adams, J. S., 'Inequity in social exchange', In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advance in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, New York : Academic Press. pp. 267-299, 1965
  3. Ambrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., & Kulik, C. T., 'Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 239-246, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.239
  4. Aquino. K., Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 21-33, 1995
  5. Aquino, K., Griffeth, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Hom, P. W., 'Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 1208-122,. 1997 https://doi.org/10.2307/256933
  6. Barling. J. & Phillips. M., Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace : An exploratory study, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 127, pp. 649-656, 1993
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G., Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 88, pp. 588-606, 1980
  8. Bies, R. J., & Moag. J. S., 'Interactional justice : Communication criteria of fairness'. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, & M.H. Bazerman(Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 43-45, 1986
  9. Bies. R. J. & Shapiro. D. L., Interactional fairness judgement: The influence of causal accounts, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, pp. 199-218, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048016
  10. Bobko, P., Multivariate correlational analysis. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough(Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(2nd ed., Vol. 1. pp. 637-686). Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990
  11. Bollen, K. A., Structural equations with latent variables, New York : Wiley, 1989
  12. Bretz, Jr, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W., 'The current state of performance appraisal research and practice : Concerns, direction, and implications', Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 321-352, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800206
  13. Carrell, M. R. & Dittrich, J. E., Equity theory : The recent literature, methodological considerations, and new directions, Academy of Management Review, April, pp. 202-210, 1976
  14. Colquitt, J. A., 'On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation of a Measure,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 386-400, 2001
  15. Cropanzano. R. & Ambrose. M. L., Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than our think : A monistic perspective and a research agenda, In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano(Eds.), Advances in organizational justice(pp. 119-151), Lexington, MA : New Lexington Press, 2001
  16. Cropanzano, R.,& Prehar, C. A., Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, 1999
  17. Deutsch, M., Equity and Need : What Determines which Value will be Used as the Basis for Distributive Justice, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 137-149, 1975
  18. Folger, R. & Konovsky, M. A., 'Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 115-130, 1989 https://doi.org/10.2307/256422
  19. Garland, H., Effects of piece rate underpayment and overpayment on the job performance : A test of equity theory with a new induction procedure, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 340-352, 1973
  20. Greenberg, J., 'Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations', Journal of Applied psychology, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 340-342, 1986a https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340
  21. Greenberg, J., 'Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, pp. 561-568, 1990a
  22. Greenberg, J., 'Organizational justice : Yesterday, today, and tomorrow', Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399-432, 1990b
  23. Greenberg, J.,'The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice : You've come a long way, maybe,' Social Justice Research, Vol. 6, pp. 135-148, 1993a
  24. Greenberg, J., 'The Social side of fairness : Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice,' In R. Cropanzano(Ed.), Justice in the workplace : Approaching fairness in human resource management, pp. 79-103, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1993b
  25. Homans, G. C., Social Behavior : It's Elementary Forms (New York : Harcourt, Brace, and Jovannovich Inc.), pp. 45-57, 1961
  26. James L. R., Mulaik, S. a, Brett J. M., Causal analysis : Assumptions, models, and data, Beverly Hills : Sage, 1982
  27. JOreskog, K. G. & SOrbom, D., LISREL 7 User's reference guide. Chicago : Scientific software, 1989
  28. Konovsky, M. A. & Folger, R.. The effectiveness of attributional cues, procedural justice, and social accounts in mitigating the negative consequences of involuntary job loss. Unpublished manuscript A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, 1989
  29. Leventhal, G. S., 'Fairness in social relationships', In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson(Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, pp. 211-240, Morristown, NJ : General Learning Press, 1976
  30. Leventhal, G. S., 'What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?: New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships', in K. S. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis(Eds.), Social exchange : Advanced in theory and research, NY : Plenum, pp. 36, 1980
  31. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R., 'Beyond fairness : A theory of allocation preferences', In G. Miikula(ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, NY : Springer-Verlag, pp. 167-218, 1980
  32. Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, NY : Plenum, 1988
  33. Long, J, S., Covariance structure models : An introduction to LISREL, Beverly Hills : Sage, 1983
  34. Mansour-Cole. D. M. & Scott. S. G., Hearing it through the grapevine : The influence of source, leader-relations, and legitimacy on survivors' fairness perceptions, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 25-54, 1998
  35. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., 와 Taylor, M. S.. Integrating Justice and social exchange : The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 738-748, 2000
  36. McFarlin, D.B., & Sweeney, P.D., 'Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes', Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, pp. 626-637, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2307/256489
  37. Moorman. R. H., Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors : Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 845-855, 1991
  38. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P., Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp. 351-357, 1998
  39. Niehoff. B. P., & Moorman. R. H., Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 527-556. 1993
  40. Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. ., Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Pitman Publishing Inc., 1986
  41. Pritchard, R. D., Dunnette, M. D., & Jorgenson, D. O., Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 75-94, 1972
  42. Shapiro. D. L., Buttner. E. H., & Barry. B., Explanations : What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. Vol. 58. pp. 346-368, 1994
  43. Silvia, S., Effects of Sampling Error and Model Misspecification on Goodness-of-fit Indices for Structural Equation Models. Ph.D. Dissertaion, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1988
  44. Skarlicki. D. P., & Folger. R., Retaliation in the workplace : the role of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 434-443, 1997
  45. Skarlicki. D. P., & Latham. G. P., Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union : A relicational, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 617-633, 1997
  46. Sweeney. P. D. & McFarlin. D. B., Workers' evaluations of the 'ends' and 'means' : An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 55, pp. 23-40, 1993
  47. Tata. J. & Bowes-Sperry. L., Emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice : Differential perceptions of men and women, Psychological Repots, Vol. 79, pp. 1327-1330, 1996
  48. Thibaut. J. & Walker. L., Procedural justice : A psychological analysis, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1975
  49. Thibaut, J. & Walker, L., 'A Theory of procedure', California Law Review, Vol. 66, pp. 541-566, 1978 https://doi.org/10.2307/3480099
  50. Tyler. T. & Bies R. J., Beyond formal procedures : The interpersonal context of procedural justice, In J. carroll(Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings, pp. 77-98, Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1990