Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Building Structures Based on the Adaptive Lateral Load Distribution

적응적 횡하중 분배방법을 이용한 건축구조물의 내진성능평가

  • Published : 2004.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is very important that predict the inelastic seismic behavior exactly for seismic performance evaluation of a building in the performance based seismic design. Evaluation method of seismic performance based on the pushover analysis reflected in PBSE was developed by some researchers. For the evaluation of inelastic global and local seismic responses by pushover analysis exactly. lateral load distribution should be adjusted and reflected the dynamic characteristics of structural system and various seismic ground motions. And performance point should be determined based on the evaluation of reasonable deformation capacity of a building more exactly. An effective method based on the improved the adaptive lateral load distribution and the equivalent responses of a multistory building is proposed in this study to efficiently estimate the accurate inelastic seismic responses. The proposed method can be used to evaluate the seismic performance for the global inelastic behavior of a building and to accurately estimate its local inelastic seismic responses. In order to demonstrate the accuracy and validity of this method, inelastic seismic responses estimated by the proposed method are compared with those obtained from other analytical methods.

성능에 기초한 내진설계 분야에서 구조물의 내진성능평가를 위해서는 비탄성 지진거동을 보다 정확하게 예즉할 필요가 있다. 성능기초 설계기준에 반영되어 있는 내진성능 평가 방법 가운데 하나인 pushover해석을 이용한 방법은 몇몇 연구자들에 의하여 다양한 해석 방법론이 개발되었다. 이 방법을 사용하여 비탄성 전체 또는 국부적 지진응답을 보다 정확하게 평가하기 위해서는 사용되는 횡하중 분배가 구조시스템과 지반운동의 동적특성에 부합되도록 반영되어야 한다. 그리고 구조물의 변형능력을 합리적으로 평가하여 성능점을 보다 정확하게 산정해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 개선된 적응적 횡하중 분배방법과 건물의 등가응답을 이용하여 비탄성 지진응답을 정확하고 효율적으로 평가할 수 있는 방법을 제안하였다. 제안된 방법은 건물의 전체 비탄성 거동에 대한 내진성능을 평가하고 국부적인 비탄성 지진응답을 정확하게 산정하는데 사용될 수 있다. 또한 제안된 방법의 정확성과 타당성을 검증하기 위해서 비탄성 시간이력해석과 기존의 다른 해석방법들에 의한 비탄성 지진응답과 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. ATC, "Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings," ATC-40 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996.
  2. FEMA, "NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings," FEMA 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997. 10.
  3. NEHRP, Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulation for Buildings and Other Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. , 2000.
  4. Iwan, W. D., Huang, C. T., and Guyader, A. C., "Important features of the response of inelastic structures to near-field ground motion," Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand, 2000. 2.
  5. Naeim, F., Skliros, K. and Reinhorn, A. M., "Influence of hysteretic deteriorations in seismic response of multistory steel frame buildings," Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand, 2000. 2.
  6. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviranta, G. D. P. K., "Pros and Cons of a Pushover Analysis of Seismic Performance Evaluation," Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, Nos. 4-6, 1998, pp. 452-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00092-8
  7. Fajfar, P., "Capacity Spectrum Method Based on Inelastic Demand Spectra," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 970-993.
  8. Miranda, E., "Estimation of Inelastic Deformation Demands of SDOF Systems," Journal of Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 127, No. 9, 2001, pp. 1005-1012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1005)
  9. Lee, D. G., Choi, W. H., and Lee, J. W., "Evaluation of Seismic Performance Using Representative Responses of Multistory Buildings," 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, 21-25 2002. 7.
  10. Lee, K. and Foutch, D. A., "Performance prediction and evaluation of steel moment frames for seismic loads," SAC Background Document SAC/BD-00/25, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, California, 2000.
  11. ATC, “Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings,” ATC 3-06 Applied Technology Council Report, 2nd Printing, Palo Alto, California, 1984.
  12. Freeman, S., Sasaki, K., and Paret , T., "Multi-Mode Push-over Procedure (MMP) - A Method to Identify the Effects of Higher Modes in a Pushover Analysis," Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Seattle, Washington, 1998.
  13. Requena, M. and Ayala. A. G., "Evaluation of a Simplified Method for the Determination of the Nonlinear Seismic Response of RC Frames," Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Upper Hutt, New Zealand, 2000. 2.
  14. Lee, D. G. and Kim, H. C., "Efficient seismic analysis of multi-story buildings," Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 4, No. 5, 1996, pp. 497-511. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1996.4.5.497
  15. Reinhorn, A. M., Inelastic techniques in seismic evaluations, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Fajfar P and Krawinkler H. eds., Bled, Slovenia, 1997. 6.
  16. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K., "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures," Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2000, pp. 367-391. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117
  17. Bracci, J. M., Kunnath, S. K., and Reinhorn, A. M., "Seismic Performance and Retrofit Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures," Journal of the Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997. 1, pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
  18. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation," Report No. PEER 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California,Berkeley, 2001. 1.
  19. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S. K., "Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands," 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1998. 6.
  20. Song, J. K. and Pincheira, J. A., "Spectral displacement demands of stiffness and strength degrading systems," Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2000, pp. 817-851. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586141
  21. Tagawa, H. and MacRae, G., "Capacity spectra method for estimating SDOF oscillator demands," Proceedings of the 2001 Structures Congress & Exposition, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D. C., 2001. 5.
  22. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., "Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures : SDF Systems," Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
  23. Aschheim, M. and Black, E. F., "Yield Point Spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation," Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2000, pp. 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586115
  24. Tsai, K. C. and Li, J. W., "DRAIN 2D+ - A General Purpose Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Analyses of Inelastic 2D Structures Supplemented with a Graphic Processor," Report, No. CEER/R86-07, National Taiwan Univ, 1997. 7.
  25. Choi, W. H and Lee, D. G., "Evaluation of Seismic Performance Multistory Building Using Improved Capacity Spectrum Method," 8th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering & Construction, Singapore, 5-7, 2001. 12.
  26. Chopra, A., K. and Goel, R. K., "Modal Pushover Analysis of SAC Buildings," Third US-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, August 16-18, Seattle, Washington, 2001.
  27. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H., "Dynamic P-Delta Effects for Flexible Inelastic Steel Structures," Journal of the Structural Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, Vol. 126, No. 1, 2000, pp. 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(145)
  28. ICBO, Uniform Building Code, International Conference on Building Officials, Whittier, California, 1997.
  29. Krawinkler, H. and Gupta, B., "Story drift demands for steel moment frame structures in different seismic regions," 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1998. 6.
  30. Lee, D. G., Song, J. K. and Yun, C. B., "Estimation of system-level ductility demands for multi-story structures," Engineering Structures, Vol. 19, No. 12, 1997, pp. 1025-1035.
  31. Otani, S., "New seismic design provisions in Japan," Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Japan, 2000. 9.