Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Regional bond strength of dentin bonding systems to pulp chamber dentin

치수강 상아질에 대한 상아질 접착제의 결합 강도에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Divisions of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Woon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Divisions of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Divisions of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University)
  • 이상혁 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최기운 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

본 연구는 치수강 상아질 부위 및 상아질 접착제 종류에 따른 결합 강도를 측정하고 이들 사이의 상관관계를 구명하고자 시행되었다 45개의 대구치를 포매 후, 대조군에서는 교합면 법랑질 제거 후 ＃600 SiC paper까지 순차연마하여 상아질을 노출시켰고, 실험군에서는 치수강 개방 후 1시간동안 NaOCl에 보관 후 axial wall과 pulpal floor를 노출시켰다. 노출된 상아질 면에 상아질 접착제를 적용한 후 Z-100을 충전한 다음 40초간 광중합하였다. 사용된 상아질 접착제는 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose와 Single Bond, Clearfil SE Bond였다. $37^{\circ}C$ 증류수에 24시간 보관 후, 저속 diamond saw를 이용하여 0.7mm 두께로 수직절단하고 고속 diamond point(#104)로 단면적 $1{mm}^2$가 되도록 시편을 제작하고, Universal testing machine에서 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하였다. 1. 모든 상아질 접착제의 미세인장강도는 대조군, axial wall군, pulpal floor군 순으로 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 2. 대조군에서 SM과 BB는 SE에 비해 유의성 있게 높은 결합강도를 나타내었다(p<0.05). 3. SM과 SB는 대조군에 비해 axial wall군과 pulpal floor군에서 유의성있게 낮은 결합강도를 보였으나, SE에서는 pulpal floor군만이 유의성 있게 낮은 결합강도를 보였다(p<0.05). 4. Axial wall군과 pulpal floor군에서는 상아질 접착제의 종류에 따른 유의차를 보이지 않았다. 5. 전자현미경 소견에서는 대조군에 비해 axial wall군과 pulpal floor군이 더 부드러운 접착 계면을 나타내었다. 혼성층의 두께는 결합강도의 감소와는 관련이 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Quintessence Publishing， 95 107, 1998
  2. West JD, Roane JB. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. Pathways of the pulp, 7th ed., Mosby, 203 257, 1998
  3. Heling L Chandler NP. Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combination within dentinal tubules Int Endod J 31:8 14, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00124.x
  4. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion? Eur J Orai Sci 108:449 455, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005449.x
  5. Cox CF. Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non exposed and exposed pulps of non human primate teeth. Am J Dent 11(Spec No):S55 63, 1998
  6. Grossman LI Meiman BW. Solution of pulp tissue by chemical agents, J Am Dent Assoc 28:223 225, 1941 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1941.0060
  7. Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Bond strengths to endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 12:177 180, 1999
  8. Inai N, Kanemura N, Tagami J, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Adhesion between collagen edpleted dentin and dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11:123 127, 1998
  9. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, Gotz H. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCI treatment. J Adhes Dent 1:135 142, 1999
  10. Titley KC, Torneck CD, Rιse ND. Krmec D. Adhesion of a resin composite to bleached and unbleached human enamel. J Endod 19:112 115, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80504-2
  11. Xie J. Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 9:295 299, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  12. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 4:28 32, 1995
  13. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mawr 16:311 323, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00021-X
  14. Daumer KM. Khan AU, Steinbeck MJ, Chlorination of pyridinium compounds. Possible role of hypochlorite， n chloramines. and chlorine in the oxidation of pyridino line cross links of articular cartilage collagen type II during acute inflammation. J Biol Chem 275:34681 34692, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002003200
  15. Nikaido T, Nakabayashi N. Relationship between polymerization and adhesion to teeth. Adhesive Dent 6:229 234, 1988
  16. Wagnild GW, MUeller KI Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Pathways of the pulp, 7th ed., Mosby， 691 717, 1998
  17. Gutmann JL. The dentin root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth, J Prosthet Dent 67:458 467, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90073-J
  18. Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Dete$\pi$nination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. J Oral Surg 34:661 670, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90351-9
  19. Berkovitz BK, Holland GR, Moxham BJ. A color atlas and textbook of oral anatomy, Histology and embryology, 2nd ed., Wolfe Publishing Ltd, 130 145, 1992
  20. Fogel HM, Marchall FJ, Pashley DH. Effects of distance from the pulp and thickness on the hydraulic conductance of human radicular dentin. J Dent Res 67:1381 1385, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670110401
  21. Burrow MF, Sano H, Nakajima M, Harada N, Tagami J. Bond strength to crown and root dentin. Am J Dent 9:223 229, 1996
  22. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke Jr RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 27:483 491, 1996
  23. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars adhesively restored. 10:237 241, 1997Am J Dent
  24. Eakld WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res 65: 149 153, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650021201
  25. Nakavayashi, N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrate. J Biomed Mater Res 16:265 273, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307
  26. Sano H, Shono T, Hidekazu S, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Materr 10:236 240, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  27. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. micromorphology of the bonded dentine interface and its relationship to bond strength Am J Dent 5:73 77, 1992
  28. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B and et al. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper Dent 20:18 25, 1995
  29. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo post reinforcement, J Prosthet Dent 42:39 44, 1979
  30. Sorensen JA,, Engleman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 63:529 536, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90070-S
  31. Hosoda H, Sugizaki J, Nakajima M, Shono T, Tagami J. A study on the mechanism of bonding between resin and dentin Part 1. Bonding to dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite. Jpn J Conser Dent 36:1054 1058, 1993
  32. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 11:117 125, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  33. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 13:44 50, 2000
  34. Ishizuka T, Kataoka H, Yoshioka T, Suda H, Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Effect of NaOCI treat ment on bonding to root canal dentin using a new evaluation method. Dent Mater J 20:24 33, 2001 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.20.24
  35. YoshiyamaM, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435 442 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00102-6
  36. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro obsercations Trans Acad Dent Mater 12:21 71, 1998
  37. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396 1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101