DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genealogical Relationship between Pedigree and Microsatellite Information and Analysis of Genetic Structure of a Highly Inbred Japanese Black Cattle Strain

  • Sasazaki, S. (Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University) ;
  • Honda, T. (Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University) ;
  • Fukushima, M. (Northern Hyogo Prefecture Institute of Agriculture) ;
  • Oyama, K. (Food Resources Education and Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe University) ;
  • Mannen, H. (Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe University) ;
  • Mukai, F. (Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe University) ;
  • Tsuji, S. (Faculty of Agriculture, Kobe University)
  • Received : 2004.02.11
  • Accepted : 2004.06.18
  • Published : 2004.10.01

Abstract

Japanese Black cattle of Hyogo prefecture (Tajima strain) are famous for its ability to produce high-quality meat and have been maintained as a closed system for more than 80 years. In order to assess the usefulness of microsatellite markers in closed cattle populations, and evaluate the genetic structure of the Tajima strain, we analyzed representative dams of the Tajima strain comprised of the substrains Nakadoi and Kinosaki. Genetic variability analyses indicated low genetic diversity in the Tajima strain. In addition, a recent genetic bottleneck, which could be accounted for by the high level of inbreeding, was detected in both substrains. In phylogenetic analyses, relationship coefficients and genetic distances between individuals were calculated using pedigree and microsatellite information. Two phylogenetic trees were constructed from microsatellite and pedigree information using the UPGMA method. Both trees illustrated that most individuals were distinguished clearly on the basis of the two substrains, although in the microsatellite tree some individuals appeared in clusters of different substrains. Comparing the two phylogenetic trees revealed good consistency between the microsatellite analysis tree and the pedigree information. The correlation coefficient between genetic distances derived from microsatellite and pedigree information was 0.686 with a high significance level (p<0.001). These results indicated that microsatellite information may provide data substantially equivalent to pedigree information even in unusually inbred herds of cattle, and suggested that microsatellite markers may be useful in revealing genetic structure without accurate or complete pedigree nformation. Japanese Black cattle of Hyogo prefecture (Tajima strain) are famous for its ability to produce high-quality meat and have been maintained as a closed system for more than 80 years. In order to assess the usefulness of microsatellite markers in closed cattle populations, and evaluate the genetic structure of the Tajima strain, we analyzed representative dams of the Tajima strain comprised of the substrains Nakadoi and Kinosaki. Genetic variability analyses indicated low genetic diversity in the Tajima strain. In addition, a recent genetic bottleneck, which could be accounted for by the high level of inbreeding, was detected in both substrains. In phylogenetic analyses, relationship coefficients and genetic distances between individuals were calculated using pedigree and microsatellite information. Two phylogenetic trees were constructed from microsatellite and pedigree information using the UPGMA method. Both trees illustrated that most individuals were distinguished clearly on the basis of the two substrains, although in the microsatellite tree some individuals appeared in clusters of different substrains. Comparing the two phylogenetic trees revealed good consistency between the microsatellite analysis tree and the pedigree information. The correlation coefficient between genetic distances derived from microsatellite and pedigree information was 0.686 with a high significance level (p<0.001). These results indicated that microsatellite information may provide data substantially equivalent to pedigree information even in unusually inbred herds of cattle, and suggested that microsatellite markers may be useful in revealing genetic structure without accurate or complete pedigree information.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajmone-Marsan, P., R. Negrini, E. Milanesi, R. Bozzi, I. J. Nijman, J. B. Buntjer, A. Valentini and J. A. Lenstra. 2002. Genetic distances within and across cattle breeds as indicated by biallelic AFLP markers. Anim. Genet. 33:280-286.
  2. Arranz, J. J., Y. Bayon and F. San Primitivo. 1996. Comparison of protein markers and microsatellites in differentiation of cattle poplations. Anim. Genet. 27:415-419.
  3. Blot, S. C., J. L. Williams and C. S. Haley. 1998. Genetic variation ithin the Hereford breed of cattle. Anim. Genet. 29:202-211.
  4. Cornuet, J. M. and G. Luikart. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001-2014.
  5. Di Rienzo, A., A. C. Peterson, J. C. Garza, A. M. Valdes, M. Slatkin and N. B. Freimer. 1994. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91(8):3166-3170.
  6. Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA aplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491.
  7. Hanslik, S., B. Harr, G. Brem and C. Schlotterer. 2000. Microsatellite analysis reveals substantial genetic differentiation between contemporary New World and Old World Holstein Friesian populations. Anim. Genet. 31(1):31- 38.
  8. Hirano, T., S. Nakane, K. Mizosita, H. Yamakuchi, M. Inoue, T. Watanabe, W. Barendse and Y. Sugimoto. 1996. Characterization of 42 highli polymorphic bovine microsatellite makers. Anim. Genet. 27:365-368.
  9. Honda, T., T. Nomura, M. Fukushima and F. Mukai. 2001. Genetic diversity of a closed population of Japanese Black Cattle in Hyogo prefecture. Anim. Sci. J. 72:378-385.
  10. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen and M. Nei. 2001. MEGA2:Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
  11. Lee, E. J., H. Mannen, M. Mizutani and S. Tsuji. 2000. Genetic Analysis of Chicken Lines by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), Anim. Sci. J. 71(3):231-238.
  12. Lee, E. J., K. Yoshizawa, H. Mannen, H. Kikuchi, T. Kikuchi, M. Mizutani and S. Tsuji. 2002. Localization of the muscular dystrophy AM locus using a chicken linkage map constructed with the Kobe University resource family. Anim. Genet. 33:42-48.
  13. Luikart, G. 1997. Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks and monitoring genetic change. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Montana, Missoula, USA.
  14. Mannen, H., S. Tsuji, N. Goto and K. Fukuta. 1993a. Identification of inbred strains of mice and genetic relationships between strains as assessed by DNA fingerprinting. Exp. Anim. 42(2):169-173.
  15. Mannen, H., S. Tsuji, F. Mukai, N. Goto and S. Ohtagaki. 1993b. Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient. J. Hered. 84(3):166-169.
  16. Mannen, H., S. Tsuji, R. T. Loftus and D. G. Bradley. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA variation and evolution in Japanese Black cattle (Bos taurus). Genetics 150:1169-1175.
  17. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7:639-655.
  18. Martin-Burriel, I., E. Garcia-Muro and P. Zaragoza. 1999. Genetic diversity analysis of six Spanish native cattle breeds using microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 30:177-182.
  19. Mukai, F., S. Tsuji, K. Fukazawa, S. Ohtagaki and Y. Nambu. 1989. History and poplation structure of a closed strain of Japanese Black Cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 106:254-264.
  20. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic Distance between populations. American Naturalist 106:283-292.
  21. Nomura, T., T. Honda and F. Mukai. 2001. Inbreeding and effective population size of Japanese Black cattle. Anim. Sci. 79:366-370.
  22. Oyama, K., T. Katsuta, K. Anada and F. Mukai. 2002. Heritability and repeatability estimates for reproductive traits of Japanese Black cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1680-1685.
  23. Peelman, L. J., F. Mortiaux, A. Van Zeveren, A. Dansercoer, G. Mommens, F. Coopman, Y. Bouquet, A. Burny, R. Renaville and D. Portetelle. 1998. Evaluation of the genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds. Anim. Genet. 29:161-167.
  24. Ritz, L. R., M-L. Glowatzki-Mullis, D. E. MacHugh and C. Gaillard. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini using microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 31:178-185.
  25. Sasazaki, S., E. J. Lee, H. Mannen, T. Kunieda, T. Sakurai, K. Yamauchi, J. S. Yeo and S. Tsuji. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of five beef cattle breeds using AFLP marker. Anim. Sci. J. 72(2):1-5.
  26. Schneider, S., J. M. Kueffer, D. Roessli and L. Excoffier. 1997. Arlequin ver. 1.1: A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
  27. Sneath, P. H. A and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freedman % Company, San Francisco, CA.
  28. Takezaki, N. and M. Nei. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic tree from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389-399.
  29. Tsuji, S., F. Mukai, N. Chihara, S. Ohtagaki and Y. Nambu. 1990. Changes of gene frequencies at some polymorphic loci in a closed herd of Japanese Black Cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 107:444-451.
  30. Toro, M., C. Barragan, C. Ovilo, J. Rodriganez, C. Rodriganez and L. Silio. 2002. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecular markers. Conservation Genetics 3:309-320.

Cited by

  1. Sheep genetic diversity in Bhutan using microsatellite markers vol.81, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00723.x
  2. Sampling method for estimating neutral allele frequency in a pedigreed population vol.129, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00968.x
  3. An autosomal recessive mutation in SCL24A4 causing enamel hypoplasia in Samoyed and its relationship to breed-wide genetic diversity vol.4, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-017-0049-1
  4. Genetic Diversity of 14 Indigenous Grey Goose Breeds in China Based on Microsatellite Markers vol.19, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1
  5. Evaluation of Genetic Variability in Kenkatha Cattle by Microsatellite Markers vol.19, pp.12, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1685
  6. Estimation of Genetic Variation in Holstein Young Bulls of Iran AI Station Using Molecular Markers vol.19, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.463
  7. Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Structure of a Guzerá (Bos indicus) Meta-Population vol.11, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041125