The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy in Normal occlusion

전후방적 악골 관계에 따른 치아치조성 보상작용에 관한 연구

  • Shim, Hae-Young (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Young-Il (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 심혜영 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 장영일 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2004.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Purpose of this study was to investigate the dentoalveolar compensation according to anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy in normal occlusion and to evaluate cephalometric parameters that quantitatively describe dental compensations. The study consisted of 90 subjects (50 males. 40 females) who were selected among specimens of normal occlusion at Seoul National, University Dental Hospital, Dept. of Orthodontics. Lateral cephalograms in centric occlusion were traced and digitized for each subject. According to the anteroposterior skeletal pattern the sample was divided into three groups. Cephalometric data were analyzed for the three groups using the SPSS program. Independent t-test, correlation analysis and regression analysis were carried out. The results were as fellows: Dentoalveolar compensation was found in upper and lower incisor inclination and occlusal plane inclination. As the mandible located anterior to the maxilla, the maxillary incisors incisors more labially. the mandibular incisors more lingually, and the occlusal plane continued to flatten. The dental parameters most correlated with anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy were L1 to SN and L1 to FH. Among the compensatory dentoalveolar changes, lower incisor inclination was strongly related to the anteroposterior jaw relationship and played au imposrtant role in obtaining a normal incisor relationship U1 to PtGn and L1 to APog were constant irrelevant to anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy.

본 연구의 목적은 정상교합자에서 전후방적 악골 관계에 따라 치아치조부 보상이 나타나는 양상을 알아보고 교정치료에 사용되는 여러 계측 항목에서 이들이 반영되는 정도를 분석하기 위한 것이다 악골 관계에 대한 치아치조성 보상을 분석하기 위하여 정상 교합자 90명(남자 50명, 여자 40명)의 측모 두부 X-선 사진을 계측하여 전후방적 악골 관계에 따라 각각 세 군으로 분류하였다. 6개의 골격 계측 항목과 19개의 치아 계측 항목에 대해 independent t-test, 상관분석과 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 악골 관계에 대한 치아치조부 보상으로 하악골이 상악골에 비해 전방 위치할수록 상악 전치는 순측 경사되고 하악 전치는 설측 경사되며 교합 평면은 경사가 완만해졌다. 치아 계측 항목 중 L1 to SN과 L1 to FH에서 전후방적 악골 관계에 대한 보상적 변화가 가장 유의성 있게 나타나 상악 전치보다 하악 전치가 치아치조부 보상과 더 관련이 있었다. 치아 계측 항목 중 U1 to PtGu과 L1 to APog은 전후방적 악골 관계와 무관하게 거의 일정한 값을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Angle EH. Malocclusion of the teeth. 7th edn: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing company, Philadelpia, 1907
  2. Andews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  3. Bjork A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. Am J Orthod 1972;62: 339-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90277-1
  4. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism:Background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 1980;7:145-61 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.7.3.145
  5. Steiner CC. Cephalometries in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29:8-29
  6. Williams R. The diagnostic line. Am J Orthod 1969;55:458-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90084-0
  7. Williams S, Leighton BC, Nielsen JH. Linear evaluation of the devel-opment of sagittal jaw relationship. Am J Orthod 1985;88:235-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(85)90218-0
  8. 김혜경, 이기수. 정상교합자의 상하악 절치 위치에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1988;18:113-25
  9. 이강희, 서정훈. 하악중절치 위치에 대한 두부 방사선 계측학적 연구. 대치교정지 1985;15:75-84
  10. 대한치과교정학회 부정교합백서발간위원회. 한국성인 정상교합자의 측모두부규격방사선 사진 계측연구 결과보고서. 1997
  11. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117:714-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70181-8
  12. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato H. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod 1999;69:534-38
  13. Sinclair PM, Little RM. Dentofacial maturation of untreated normals. Am J Orthod 1985;88:146-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90239-8
  14. Donovan RW. Recent research for diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1954;40:591-609 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(54)90068-8
  15. Bibby RE. Incisor relationships in different skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 1980;50:41-4
  16. Schudy FF. Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963;33:69-82
  17. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometries. Angle Orthod 1981;51:105-15
  18. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod 1971;41: 271 -85
  19. Simons ME, Joondeph DR. Change in overbite: a ten year postretention study. Am J Orthod 1973;64:349-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90243-1
  20. Jacobson, A. Application of the Wits appraisal Am J Orthod 1976;70:179-89