The Effects of Rainbow Theraphy on Functional Headache

기능성 두통에 대한 Rainbow Theraphy의 치료효과

  • Kim, Jin-Hyung (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Gug, Yun-Jai (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Yang, Hee-Sook (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Mi (Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, Oriental medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Heon (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lyu, Young-Su (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Hyung-Won (Department of Neuropsychology, College of Oriental Medicine, Wonkwang University)
  • 김진형 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실) ;
  • 국윤재 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실) ;
  • 양희숙 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실) ;
  • 권영미 (원광대학교 한의과대학 진단방사선과학) ;
  • 김태헌 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실) ;
  • 유영수 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실) ;
  • 강형원 (원광대학교 한의과대학 신경정신과교실)
  • Published : 2004.11.30

Abstract

Objective : There are many treatments for Headache. We suggested the clinical effect and utilization of Rainbow Theraphy on functional headache. Methods : 1. Setting up of Groups : A Group is 29 people being used Herb remedy, acupuncture and Rainbow Theraphy, B Group is 23 people being used only Rainbow Theraphy. 2. Operation of Rainbow Theraphy : By using RP-UM103(Umax Medical, Korea), we regulated ki and stimulated important acupuncture’s spots of headache. 3. We examined improvement of headache by giving marks about symptoms - occipital pain, Pressure, dyspepsia, anxiety, fatigue, attention deficiency - through interviewing before treatment and after 3 weeks' treatments. Results and Conclusions : 1. There was a significantly effect of Rainbow Theraphy on functional headache in both A Group and B Group. 2. In subjective appraisee of groups, A group$(17.28{\pm}2.15)$ is more effective than B group$(14.74{\pm}2.38)$. 3. In doctor's last appraisee of groups, A group$(3.83{\pm}0.71)$ is more significantly improvement than B group$(2.70{\pm}0.47)$.

Keywords