DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sport biomechanical comparative analyses between general sporting shoe and functional walking shoe

보행용 전문 신발과 일반 운동화의 운동역학적 비교 분석

  • Published : 2003.08.30

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the kinematic and kinetic differences between functional walking shoe(FWS) and general sports shoe(GSS). The subjects for this study were 4 male adults who had the walking pattern of rearfoot strike with normal feet. The movement of one lower leg was measured using force platform and 3 video cameras while the subjects walked at the velocity of 2/1.5 m/s. The findings of this study were as follows 1. The angle of lower leg-ground and angle of knee with FWS was greater than with GSS at the moment of strike the floor and the moment of second peak ground reaction force. The decreasing rate of angle of ankle was smaller in FWS from the strike phase to the second peak ground reaction force. These mean upright walking and round walking along the shoe surface. 2. The maximal Increased angle of Achilles tendon and the minimal decreased angle of rearfoot were smaller in FWS very significantly(p<0.001). Thus FWS prevent the excessive pronation of ankle and have good of rear-foot control. 3. The vortical ground reaction force and the rate of it to the BW were smaller in FWS statistically(p<0.001). The loading rate was smaller in FWS, too, and thess represent the reduction of load on ankle joint and prevention of injuries on it.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽창수 (1993). 운동화 중저의 경도가 주행시 발바닥의 압력 분포와 충격 흡수에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. : pp.64-87.
  2. 곽창수.최규정.이종각.권영후.김의환.이동우.성낙준.유문종.정민근 (1994). 마라톤화 중저의 부위별 경도가 충격 흡수 및 추진력의 크기에 미치는 효과. 1994년도 한국체육과학연구원 연구과제종합보고서. : pp.3-15.
  3. 김석관 (1999). 신발 산업의 기술 혁신 패턴과 전개 방향. 과학기술정책연구원보고서 : pp.123-137.
  4. 이연종 (1997). 주행 시 체중에 따른 운동화 중도 경도의 차이가 충격 흡수와 후족 제어에 미치는 영향. 한국체육대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. : pp.32-58.
  5. 태의경 (1991). 운동화 바닥의 탄성에 따른 역학적 에너지 소비의 변화. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문. : pp.31-34.
  6. 한국과학기술원 (1987). 달리기용 운동화 개선을 위한 연구. 1987년도 한국체육과학연구원 연구과제 종합보고서. : pp.163-236.
  7. Balsen, A. and Nigg, B. M. (1987). Influence of attached masses on impact forces and running style in heel-toe running. International. J. of Sport Biomechanics. 3(3) : pp.264-275. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsb.3.3.264
  8. Caltin, M. E. and Dressendorfer, S. A. (1979). Effect of shoe weight on the energy cost of running. Medical Science of Sports. 11 : pp.80-92.
  9. Cavanagh, P. R. (1987). The Biomechanics of lower extremity action in distance running. Foot and Ankle. 7 : pp.197-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078700700402
  10. Cavanagh, P. R. and Lafortune, M. A. (1980). Ground reaction forces in distance running. J. of Biomechanics. 13 : pp.397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0
  11. Clarke, T. E., Fredrick, E. C., and Cooper, L. P. (1983). Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running. International. J. of Sports Medicine. 4.
  12. Cook, S. D., Kester, M. A., Brunet, M. E. (1985). Shock absorption characteristics of running shoes. American J. of Sports Medicine. 13 : pp.248-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658501300406
  13. Elliot, B. C. and Blanksby, B. A. (1979). A biomechanical analysis of male jogging action, J. of Human Movement Study. 5 : pp.42-51.
  14. Frederick, E. C., Clarke, T. E., and Hamill, C. L. (1984). The effect of running shoe design on shock attenuation. In Sport Shoes and Playing Surfaces, E. C. Frederick(ed.), Champaign, I11. : Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc. : pp.190-198.
  15. Hennig, E. M. (1984). Pressure distribution under the impacting human foot during expected and unexpected falls, Ph.D dissertion at Pennsylvania State University.
  16. Monro, C. F., Miller, D. I., Nad Fuglevand, A. J. (1987). Ground reaction force in running : A reexamination. J. of Biomechanics, 20 : pp.147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90306-X
  17. Mann, R. A. (1980). Biomechanics in Running. In Symposium on the Foot and Leg in Running Sports, R. P. Mack(ed.) St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Co. : pp.1-29.
  18. Nigg, B. M. (1986). Some comments for runners. In Biomechanics of Running Shoes, B. M. Nigg(ed.), Champaign, III : Human Kinematics Publishers, Inc. : pp.162-165.
  19. Nigg, B. M., Bahlsen, H. A., Leuthi, S .M., Stokes, S. (1987). The influence of running velocity and midsole on external impact forces in heel toe running. J. of Biomechanics. 20(10) : pp.951-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90324-1
  20. Nigg, B. M. and Segesser, B. (1992). Biomechanical and orthopedic concepts in sport shoe construction, Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. 24 : pp.595-606.
  21. Segesser B. (1976). Load of human body on artificial sport floors. Sporttattenbau und Baderanlagen 4 : pp.1182-1194

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Plantar Pressure Differences between Flat Insole Trekking Shoes and Nestfit Trekking Shoes vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2015.25.4.475
  2. The Effect of Form of Outsole on Lower Leg Electromyography during Gait vol.13, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.1.227
  3. Mechanical principles and motions for increasing the height of Fosbury flop vol.13, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.3.001
  4. The Effect of Form and Hardness of Outsoles on the Motion of the Lower Extremity Joints and on Foot Pressure during Gait vol.21, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2011.21.2.223
  5. Effects of Forefoot Rocker Shoes with Metatarsal Bar on Lower Extremity Muscle Activity and Plantar Pressure Distribution vol.22, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2012.22.1.113
  6. Biomechanical Evaluation of Trekking Shoes using 3D Bootie Method as Mimics Barefoot Form vol.16, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.7.4689
  7. The Evaluation of an additional Weight Shoe's Function developed for the Improvement of Aerobic Capacity vol.14, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.3.067
  8. Biomechanical Analysis of Muscle Fatigue and Ground Reaction Force for the Development of Outdoor Walking Shoes vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.4.413
  9. A Kinematic Analysis of Gait Patterns between the Normal Men and the Lower Limb Handicapped vol.13, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2003.13.3.163
  10. Effect of Shoes Sole Form on Knee and Ankle Muscle Activity vol.9, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2014.9.4.347
  11. Effects for Running Shoes with Resilience of Midsole on Biomechanical Properties vol.25, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2015.25.1.103
  12. The Differences of the Normalized Jerk According to Shoes, Velocity and Slope During Walking vol.16, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2006.16.2.001
  13. The change of gait on shoes sole form vol.7, pp.S1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A100