Motor Evoked Potentials Study of the Facilitation and Reciprocal Inhibition Induced by Motor Imagination in the Thumb Muscles

무지근육에서 상상의 운동과 연관된 촉진과 억제에 관한 운동 유발 전위 검사

  • Yang, Hyun Duk (Department of Neurology, Wonkwang University Gunpo Medical Center, College of Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Son, Il Hong (Department of Neurology, Wonkwang University Gunpo Medical Center, College of Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Suk, Seung Han (Department of Neurology, Wonkwang University Gunpo Medical Center, College of Medicine, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Sung Soo (Department of Neurology, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 양현덕 (원광대학교 의과대학 군포병원 신경과학교실) ;
  • 손일홍 (원광대학교 의과대학 군포병원 신경과학교실) ;
  • 석승한 (원광대학교 의과대학 군포병원 신경과학교실) ;
  • 이성수 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 신경과학교실)
  • Published : 2003.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: MEPs elicited by transmagnetic stimulations of the motor cortex are facilitated by voluntary muscle contraction. We evaluated the effects of the imagination of the movements on latencies of MEPs and reciprocal inhibition by using transmagnetic stimulations. Methods: Twenty two healthy volunteers(eight men and fourteen women) were studied. TMSs were delivered at rest and during imagining abducting or adducting right thumb. A stimulator with a round coil and a fixed intensity of 80% of maximum was used to evoke MEPs. MEPs were evoked by magnetic stimulations over the scalp and cervical spine(C7-T1), and central motor conduction times(CMCT) were calculated by subtracting the latency of compound muscle action potentials(CMAPs) obtained by stimulating over the cervical spine from that obtained by stimulating over the scalp. The motor evoked potentials were recorded from right abductor pollicis brevis muscle(APB) and adductor pollicis muscle(AP) simultaneously. Results: Imagination of abduction resulted in a shortened latency of the CMAPs in APB, and a prolonged latency in AP. Imagination of adduction resulted in a shortened latency in AP, and a prolonged latency in APB. But the imagination caused no significant change in the latency of CMAPs elicited by stimulation over cervical spine. Therefore, the changes of the CMCTs account for these latency changes with imagination of movement. With the imagination of abduction, there are significant reduction of the CMCT's in APB(10.8%) and prolongation in AP(5.8%). On the other hand, with the imagination of adduction, prolongation of the CMCT's in APB(7.3%) and reduction in AP(5.9%) were observed. Conclusion: These findings indicate that imagination of muscle contraction increases the excitability of the human corticospinal system. Reciprocal inhibition may be accountable for the prolonged latency in the antagonist muscle.

Keywords