The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NEWLY DESIGNED IMPLANT WITH RBM SURFACE IN THE RABBIT TIBIA : RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND REMOVAL TORQUE STUDY

  • Won Mi-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang Kyoung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Isa Zakiahbt Mohd (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Univ. of Malaya) ;
  • Ariffin Yusnidar Tajul (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Univ. of Malaya)
  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. The importance of fixture design and surface treatment. Purpose. The clinical success of dental in plants is affected by many factors such like as degree of osseointegration, the effective load dispersion for the prostheses, and a lot of attempts have been made to overcome the difficulties. In this study, efforts were made to find the possibility of clinical acceptance of the dental implants of newly designed surface and resorbable blast media surcace. Materials and methods. In this study, two groups of custom-made, screw-shaped implants were prepared. The first with the consisting of Branemark clone design and the other with the new design. These implants were divided into four groups according to the kinds of surface treatment. Four implants($AVANA^{(R)}$, Osstem, Busan, Korea)of each group were installed in twenty rabbits. Group A was consisted of Branemark done implant left as machined, Group B with Branemark clone implants with RBM(Resorbable blast media) surface, Group C with newly designed implants left as machined and Group D with newly designed implants with RBM surface. One of the twenty rabbits died from inflammation and the observation was made for six weeks. Specimens from four groups were observed using scanning electron microscopy with 40, 100, 1000 magnification power and microsurface structures were measured by white-light scanning interferometry for three dimensional surface roughness measurements(Accura $2000^{(R)}$, Intek-Plus, Korea.). Removal torque was measured in 17 rabbits using digital torque gauge(MGT 12R, Mark-10 corp., NY, U.S.A.) immediately after the sacrifice and two rabbits were used for the histologic preparation(EXAKT $310^{(R)}$, Heraeus Kulzer, wehrheim, Germany) of specimens and observed under light microscope. Resonance frequency measurement($Osstell^{(R)}$) was taken with the 19 rabbits at the beginning of the implant fixation and immediately after the sacrifice. Results. Following results were taken from the experiment. 1. The surface of the RBM implants as seen with SEM had rough and irregular pattern with reticular formation compared to that of fumed specimens showing different surface topographies. 2. The newly designed implant with RBM surface had high removal torque value among four groups with no statistical significance. The average removal torque was $49.95{\pm}6.70Ncm$ in Group A, $51.15{\pm}4.40Ncm$ in Group B, $50.78{\pm}9.37Ncm$ in Group C, $51.09{\pm}4.69Ncm$ in Group D. 3. The RFA values were $70.8{\pm}4.3Hz$ in Group A, $71.8{\pm}3.1Hz$ in Group B, $70.9{\pm}2.5Hz$, $72.7{\pm}2.5Hz$ in Group D. Higher values were noted in the groups which had surface treatment compared to the untreated groups with no statistical significance. 4. The results from the histomorphometric evaluation showed a mean percentage of bone-to-implant contact of $45{\pm}0.5%$ in Group A, $55{\pm}3%$ in Group B, $49.5{\pm}0.5%$ in Group C, and $55{\pm}3%$ in Group D. Quite amount of newly formed bone were observed at the surface RBM-treated implants in bone marrow space.

Keywords

References

  1. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration : a requiem for the periodontal ligament? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:88-91
  2. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontologi 1990;18, 474-481
  3. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  4. Albrektsson T, Hansson HA, Ivarsson B. Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants. Biomaterials 1985;6:97-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(85)90070-5
  5. Brdnemark P.I, Hansson BO, Adell R . Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous Jaw. Experience from a 10year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;16
  6. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  7. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359
  8. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-635
  9. Adell R. Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prosthesis in edentulous jaw. Jprosthet Dent 1983; 50:251-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90026-4
  10. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI, Linddhe J, Eriksson B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseoitegrated titanium fixtures I. A three-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Surg 1986;15:39-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2
  11. Albrektsson B, Zarb G,Worthington P,Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  12. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
  13. Albrektsson T, Brdnemark P.I, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  14. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Cho I.H, Sennerby L. The influence of simultaneous versus delayed placement on the stability of titanium implants in onlay bone grafts. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:224-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80143-X
  15. Meredith N, Alleyene D, Cawley P. Qualitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:261-269 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  16. Meredith N. On the clinical measurement of implant stability and osseointegration. Goteborg, Sweden: Department of Biomaterials / Handicap Research, University of G$\"{o}$teborg. Ph D Thesis 1997
  17. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Imp Res 1997;8:234-243 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  18. Robert RW, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith R: Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
  19. Donath K. Die Trenn-Dunnschliff-Technik zur Herstellung histologischer Praparaten von nicht schneidbaren Geweben und Materialien. Der $Pra^{..}$ parator 1988;34:197-206
  20. Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphogenic study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  21. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materialws in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1567-1575 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291213
  22. Johansson C.B, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit. A l-year follow-up of removal torque of Ti implants. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;2:69-75
  23. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
  24. Bobyn J, Pilliar R, Cameron H. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surface metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop. 1980;150:263-270
  25. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H et al. A histo-morphometric evaluation of implant contact on machined-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clinical Oral Implant Res. 1994;5:202-206 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050402.x
  26. Gotfredesen K, Nimb L, Herring-Hansen E. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TtO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study in dog. Cline Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:77-84 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030205.x
  27. Martin JY, Schwarttz, Hummer TW. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells(MG63). J Biomater Res. 1995;29:389-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290314
  28. Breme J, Wadewitz V, Fiirbacher B. Production and mechanical properties of porous sintered specimens of the implant alloy TiA15Fe2. Advances in Biomaterials. 1990;9:63-68
  29. Martin J, Schwartz Z, Hummert T. Effectof titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:389-401 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290314
  30. Brunette D. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxi1lofac Implants. 1988;3:231-246
  31. Boyan BD, Hummert T, Kieswetter K. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell respone. Biomaterials. 1996;17:137-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9
  32. Kim Y.S. 3-dimensional finite element study on surface characteristics and stress of implants. SNUDH Dept of Prosthodontics. Unpublished
  33. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometrifc and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  34. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p.titanium screws blasted with 25-and 75-micron-sized particles of Al203. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:251-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<251::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-P
  35. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Anderssen B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:38-45
  36. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and gritblasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting materials and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)80750-2
  37. Von Rerum AF, van Kooten TG. The influence of microtopography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci polymer Edition 1995;7:181-198
  38. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Sennerby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. A study in the rabbit tibia. Clin oral Imp Res 1997;8:103-116 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080205.x
  39. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Kahnberg K.E, Sennerby L. Stability assessments and histology of titanium implants placed simultaneously with autogenous onlay bone grafts in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:229-235 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80019-2
  40. Park C. A study on the measurement of the implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. PhD thesis, 2000, Dankook University, Korea
  41. Park CJ. In vitro comparative study between ISQ and Periostest ⓡ ${\circledR}$ values on the implant stability measurements according to the increased effective implant length. J Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2001;39:625-635
  42. Park CJ. A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. Ph D thesis(Manuscript). 2000, Seoul National University, Korea