The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES ON 2-UNIT CANTILEVERED RESIN-BONDED FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE

2-unit cantilever 레진접착성 가공의치 (resin-bonded fixed partial denture) 임상의 현재

  • Yi Yang-Jin (Department of prosthodontics and research institute of oral science, College of dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Choi Lee-Ra (Department of prosthodontics and research institute of oral science, College of dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Parki Chan-Jin (Department of prosthodontics and research institute of oral science, College of dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • 이양진 (강릉대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Published : 2003.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Resin-bonded bridge has been an alternative to conventional bridge, since resin-bonded bridge has many attractive advantages such as minimal tooth preparation, short chair time and low cost over conventional bridge. Unfortunately, however, it was reported that resin-bonded bridge showed high failure rate from debonding of retainer in spite of consecutive advances in preparation and materials. And it was shown that multiple abutments were more likely to fail. The majority of debonding failure was considered due to the mobility of the abutment during function. In this view, recently, modification in resin-bonded bridge design was tried. Single retainer, single pontic. 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridge was applied to clinical performance and was shown as retentive or more retentive than fixed-fixed type resin-bonded bridge. This was consistent with the results of studies in 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridges made with all ceramic, In-ceram. The purpose of this article was to overview principles of design and to analyze clinical results of 2-unit cantilevered resin-bonded bridge in comparison with the reports of fixed-fixed resin-bonded bridge.

Keywords

References

  1. Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:418-423 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90163-7
  2. Kern M, knode H, Strub JR. The allporcelain, resin-bonded bridges. Quintessence Int 1991;22:257-262
  3. Sasaki S. Adhesion bridges that use the peculiarity of macromolecule materials. In: Aihara H et al (eds). Esthetics of dental technoloy. Seoul: Korea Quintessence. 2000;216-223
  4. Briggs P, Bishop K. The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge. Br Dent J 1996;181:373-379 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809263
  5. Chan AW, Barnes IE. A progressive study of cantilever resin-bonded bridges: An initial report. Aust Dent J 2000;45(1):31-36 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00239.x
  6. Livaditis GJ, Thompson VP. Etched castings: An improved rtentive mechanism for resin-bonded retainers. J prosthet Dent 1982;47:52-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90242-6
  7. Moon PC, Knap FJ. Acid-etched bridge bond strength utilizing a new retention method. J Dent Res 1983 (Special issue A);62:abstract 296
  8. Moon PC. Bond strength of the lost salt procedure: A new retention method for resin-bonded fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:435-439 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90009-6
  9. Laufer BZ, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. SiOx-C coating: A composite to metal bonding mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1986;60:320-327
  10. Imbery TA, Davis RD. Evaluation of tinplating systems for a high-noble alloy. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:55-59
  11. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of non-precious alloys for adhesion-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:456-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90176-9
  12. Kohli S, Levine WA, Grisius RJ, Fenster RK. The effect of three different surface treatments on the tensile strength of the resin bond to nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:4-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90255-B
  13. Hussey DL, Pagni C, Linden GJ. Performance of 400 adhesive bridges fitted in a restorative dentistry department. J Dent 1991;19:221-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(91)90122-F
  14. Gilmour ASM, Ali A. Clinical performance of resin-retained fixed partial dentures bonded with a chemically active luting cement. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:569-573 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80118-0
  15. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of resin bonded bridges and splints. Br Dent J 1993;174:405-411 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808186
  16. Brabant A. Indication and design: The Key to successful resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. In: Degrange M, Roulet J-F (eds). Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Chicago:Quintessence, 1997;201-210
  17. Kern M. Clinical outcome of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Dent Res 2002:81 (special issue A):abstract1066
  18. Botelho M. Resin-bonded prostheses: The current state of development. Quintessence Int 1999;30:525-534
  19. Plainfield S, Wood V, Podesta R. A stress-relieved resin-bonded fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:291-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90130-3
  20. Thayer KE, Williams VD, Diaz-Arnold AM, Boyer DB. Acid-etched, resin bonded cast metal prostheses: A retrospective study of 5- to 15-year-old restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:264-269
  21. Probster B, Henrich GM. 11-year follow-up study of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:259-268
  22. EI-Mowafy O, Rubo MHM. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:425-431
  23. Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges: A retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1991;22:873-877
  24. Marinello CP, Kerschbaum T, Heinenberg B, Hinz R, Peters S et al. First experiences with resin-bonded bridges and splints-A cross-sectional retrospective study. Part II. J Oral Rehab 1988;15:223-235 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00152.x
  25. Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Resin-bonded bridges: University of Minnesota recall data. J Dent Res 1990;69:abstract 2031
  26. Hussey DL, Linden GJ. The clinical performance of cantilevered resin-bonded bridgework. J Dent 1996;24(4):251-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00073-9
  27. Priest G. An 11-year reevaluation of resin bonded fixed partial dentures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995;15:238-247
  28. Gilmour ASM. Resin-bonded bridges: A note of caution. Br Dent J 1989;167:140-141 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806931
  29. Kern M, Knode H, Strub JR. The all-porcelain. resin-bonded bridge. Quintessence Int 1991;22:257-262
  30. Durr D, Schulthei $\beta$ R, Kern M, Strub JR.Clinical comparison of porcelain-fused-to-metal and all-porcelain resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res 1993;72:abstract908
  31. Kern M, Strub JR. Bonding to alumina ceramicin restorative dentistry: clinical results over up to 5 years. J Dent 1998;26:245-249 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00009-2
  32. Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Goldhofer G, Gernet W. All-ceramic resin-bonded bridges: A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis study. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:390-395 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00097.x
  33. Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Unsold F, Gernet W. Four-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram adhesive bridges: Preliminary results. J Dent Res 1996;75:abstract1036
  34. Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Unsold F. A new design for all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 1996;27:753-758
  35. Basselt JL. Replacement of missing mandibular lateral incisors with a single pontic all-ceramic prosthesis: A case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9(4):455-461
  36. Kern M, Strub JR. Cantilevered all-ceramic, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: A new treatment modality. J Esthet Dent 1997;9(5):255-264 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00951.x
  37. Botelho M. Design principles for cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2000;31:613-619
  38. Koutayas SO, Kern M, Ferraresso F, Strub JR. Influence of design and mode of loading on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:540-547 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70012-6
  39. Koutayas SO, Kern M, Ferraresso F, Strub JR. Influence of framework on fracture strength of mandibular anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fIxed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:223-229
  40. Kern M, Schwarzbach W, Strub JR. Stability of all-porcelain , resin-bonded fixed restorations with different designs: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:108-113
  41. Trushkowsky RD. Esthetic alternative to conventional resin-bonded fixed partial dentures with In-Ceram. J Esthet Dent 1994;6(3):115-120 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00844.x
  42. Kern M, Fechtig T, Strub JR. Influence of water storage and thermal cycling on the fracture strength of all-porcelain, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:251-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90463-4
  43. Botelho MG, Nor LC, Kwong HW, Kuen BS. Two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fIxed partial dentures- A retrospective, preliminary clinical investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:25-28
  44. Johnston CD, Hussey DR. The immediate replacement of incisor teeth by cantilevered resin-bonded bridgework. Dental Update 1993;20:333-335