Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment (생태와환경)

The Korean Society of Limnology (한국수생태학회)
권호 표지

A Classic Viewpoint on Fish Removal Biomanipulation in Whole-lake Studies

호소전체를 대상으로 한 고전적 관점의 생물학적 조절법에 관한 소고: 물고기 제거에 의한 호소 수질 향상

  • Chung, Sang-Ok (Harmful Algal Blooming Control Laboratory (HABCL)-NRL, Kongju National University)
  • 정상옥 (공주대학교 유해조류대발생예방연구실-국가지정연구실)
  • Published : 2003.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For some decades eutrophication poses a great problem in water quality management in fresh-waters. To solve this problem, studies based on "bottom-up" hypothesis have been mostly carried out worldwidely unlike biomanipulation. This implies that not only fish but also fish stock playa key role down to other food web components in pelagic ecosystem. It is generally accepted that biomanipulation becomes a potent tool for eutrophication control. For a practical application of this, however, further development and understanding of the food web under the specific lake condition on a whole-lake scale are needed. The question is how can we maintain the positive effects resulted from biomanipulation (fortuitous or planned) for a long period.

수십년 전부터 민물의 부영양화는 수질 관리에 문제를 제기해왔다. 전세계적으로 생물학적 조절론이 아닌 영양염류 저감론에 의한 부영양화 해결 방안이 대세를 이루고 있다. 생물학적 조절법은 호소 생태계에서 최상위 먹이망에 위치한 물고기 생태와 생체량의 중요성에 착안한 수질 향상 이론으로 부영양화 해결을 위한 강력한 도구로 받아들여지고 있다. 그러나 실제적으로 수질 향상을 위한 긍정적 효과를 얻으려면 해당 각 수역 전체의 먹이망에 관한 정확한 이해가 필요하다. 생물학적 조절법으로 얻은 수질 향상 효과를 장기간에 걸쳐서 누리려면 어떻게 해야 최적인가가 현재 제기되는 논의의 중심이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Benndorf, J. 1995. Possibilities and limits for controllingeutrophication by biomanipulation. Int.Revue. ges. Hydrobiol. 80: 519-534.
  2. Breukelaar, A.W., E.H.R. Lammens, J.P.G. KleinBreteler and I. Tatrani. 1994. Effect of benthivorousbream (Albramis brama L.) and carp (Cyprinuscaprio L.) on sediment resuspension and concentrationsof nutrients and chlorophyll a. Freshwat.Biol. 32: 113-121.
  3. Carpenter, S.R., J.F. Kitchell and J.R. Hodgson. 1985.Cascading trophic interactions and lake Productivity:Fish predation and herbivory can regulatelake ecosystems. BioScience 35: 634-639.
  4. Chung, S.O. 2001. Phytoplankton dynamics and recolonizationafter a biomanipulation of the Pontde-Salars reservoir, Thèse de 3ème cycle. Univ.Toulouse III. 174pp.
  5. Drenner, R.W. and K.D.Hambright. 1999. Biomanipulationof fish assemblages as a lake restorationtechnique. Arch. Hydrobiol. 146: 129-165.
  6. Edmonson, W.T. 1994a. Experiments and quasi-experimentsin limnology. Bull. Mar. Sci. 53: 65-83.
  7. Edmonson, W.T. 1994b. Sixty years of Lake Washington: A curriculum vitae. Lake Reservoir Manage.10: 75-84.
  8. Francisco, P. and J.-N. Tourenq. 1997. The drainageof a large reservoir considered as an experimental biomanipulation. First results: fish control on thestructure and biochemical composition of plankton.Annls. Limnol. 33: 121-133.
  9. Goldyn, R., A. Kozak and W. Romanowicz. 1997.Food-web manipulation in the Maltànski Reservoir.Hydrobiol. 342/343: 319-325.
  10. Gophen, M. 1990. Biomanipulation : retrospectiveand future development. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 1-11.
  11. Gulati, R.D., E.H.R.R. Lammens, M.-L. Meijer andE. van Donk. 1990. Biomanipulation-tool for watermanagement. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 627pp.
  12. Hanson, M.A. and M.G. Butler. 1994. Responses ofplankton, turbidity, and macrophytes to biomanipulationin a shallow Prairie Lake. Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 51: 1180-1188.
  13. Horppila, J., H. Peltonen, T. Malinen, E. Luokkanenand T. Kairesalo. 1998. Top-down or bottom-upeffects by fish: Issues of concerns in biomanipulationof lakes. Restoration Ecology 6: 20-28.
  14. Hjerne, O. and S. Hansson. 2002. The role of fish andfisheries in Baltic Sea nutrient dynamics. Limnol.Oceanogr. 47(4): 1023-1032.
  15. Hrbᡠcek, J., M. Dvoˇrakova, V. Koˇrínek and L. Procházkóva.1961. Demonstration of the effect of thefish stockon the species composition of zooplanktonand the intensity of metabolism of the wholeplankton association. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol.14: 192-195.
  16. Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, J.P. Jensen, E. Mortensenand O. Sortkaer. 1996. Fish-induced changesin zooplankton on phytoplankton and bacterioplankton:a long-term study in shallow hypertrophicLake Sobygaard. J. Plankton Res. 18: 1605-1625.
  17. Jeppesen, E., M. Sondergaard, T. Lauridsen, L. Jungeand L. Jensen. 1997. Top-down control in freshwaterlakes: the role of nutrient state, submergedmacrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 151-164.
  18. Johnson, T.B. and J.F. Kitchell. 1996. Long-termchanges in zooplanktivorous fish community composition:implications for food webs. Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 53: 2792-2803.
  19. Kasprzak, P., L. Krienitz and R. Koschell. 1993.Changes in the plankton of Lake Feldberger Haussee(Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) in responseto biomanipulation. Arch. Hydrobiol. 128:149-168.
  20. Lammens, E.H. R.R., R.D. Gulati, M.-L. Meijer andE. van Donk. 1990. The first biomanipulation conference: a synthesis. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 619-627.
  21. Lathrop, R.C., S.R. Carpenter and L.G. Rudstam. 1996. Water clarity in Lake Mendota since 1900 : responses to differing levels of nutrients and herbivory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 2250-2261.
  22. McQueen, D.J., J.R. Prost and E.L. Mills. 1986. Tro-phic relationshps in freshwater pelagic ecosystems.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 1571-1581.
  23. McQueen, D.J. 1998. Freshwater food web biomanipulation:A powerful tool for water quality improvement,but maintenance is required. Lake andReserv. Manage. 3: 83-94.
  24. Meijer, M.-L., M.W. de Haan, A.W. Brekelaar and H.Buiteveld. 1990. Is reduction of benthivorous fishan important cause of high transparency followingmanipulation in small lakes. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 303-315.
  25. Meijer, M.-L. and H. Hosper. 1997. Effects of biomanipulationin the large and shallow Lake Wolderwijd,The Netherlands. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 335-349.
  26. Meijer, M.-L., E. Jeppesen, E. van Donk, B. Moss, M.Scheffer, E. Lammens, E. van Nes, J.A. vanBerkum, G.J. de Jong, B.A. Faafeng and J.P.Jensen. 1994. Long-term responses to fish-stockreduction in small shallow lakes : interpretationof five-year results of four biomanipulation casesin The Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiol.275/276: 457-466.
  27. Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.),W.B. Saunders Com., Philadelphia : 574pp.
  28. Pijanowska, J. and A. Prejs. 1997. Food-web manipulationin shallow, eutrophic lakes : Bridging thegap between the whole-lake approach and behaviouraland demographic studies. Hydrobiol. 342/343: 305-310.
  29. Prejs, A., J. Pijanowaska, P. Koperski., A. Martyniak,S. Boron and P. Hilwa. 1997. Food-web manipulationin a small, eutophic Lake Wirbel, Poland:Long-term changes in fish biomass : a basic measureof water quality. A case study. Hydrobiol.342/343: 383-386.
  30. Reinertsen, H., A. Jensen, J.I. Koksvik, A. Langelandand Y. Olsen. 1990. Effects of fish removal on thelimnetic ecosystem of a eutrophic lake. Can. J.Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47: 166-173.
  31. Reynolds, C.S. 1994. Invited review: The ecologicalbasis for the successful biomanipulation of aquaticcommunities. Arch. Hydrobiol. 130: 1-33.
  32. Reynolds, C.S. 1997. Vegetation processes in the pelagic:a model for ecosystem theory : Excellence onecology N􀆆9. Ecology Institute. Oldendorf/LuheGermany. 371pp.
  33. Phillips, G.F. and B. Moss. 1993. Is biomanipulationan useful technique in lake management? National NationalRivers Authority, Bristol: pp. 1-43.
  34. Schindler, D.W. 1988. Experimental studies of chemicalstressors on whole-lake ecosystems. Verh.Int. Verein. Limnol. 23: 11-41.
  35. Shapiro, J., V. Mamara and M. Lynch. 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration,In: Proc. Sym. on Water quality managementthrough biological control (Brezonik and Foxeds.). University of Florida, pp. 85-99.
  36. Shapiro, J. 1990. Biomanipulation : the next phasemakingit stable. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 13-17.
  37. Shapiro, J. 1995. Lake restoration by biomanipulation-a personal view. Environ. Rev. 3: 83-93.
  38. Shapiro, J. and D.I. Wright. 1984. Lake restorationby biomanipulations. Round Lake, Minnesota-thefirst two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371-383.
  39. Søndergaard, M., E. Jeppesen, E. Mortensen, E. Dall,P. Kristensen and O. Sortkjaer. 1990. Phytoplanktonbiomass reduction after planktivorousfish reduction in a shallow, eutrophic lake : acombined effect of reduced internal P-loading andincreased zooplankton grazing. Hydrobiol. 200/201: 229-240.
  40. Stenson, J.A.E., T. Bohlin and L. Henrikson et al.1978. Effects of fish removal in a small lake. Verh.Int. Verein. Limnol. 20: 794-801.
  41. van Donk, E., R.D. Gluati and M.P. Grimm. 1989.Food-web manipulation of Lake Zwemlust : Positiveand negative effects during the first two years.Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19-35.
  42. van Donk, E., M.P. Grimm, R.D. Gulati and J.P.G.Klein Breteler. 1990. Whole-lake food-web manipulationas a means to study community interactionsin a small ecosystem. Hydrobiol. 200/201:275-289.
  43. Vanni, M.J., C. Luecke, J.F. Kitchell and J.J. Magnuson.1990. Effects of planktivorous fish mortalityon the plankton community of Lake Mendota,Wisconsin : Implications for biomanipulation.Hydrobiol. 200/201: 329-336.
  44. Vighi, M., D. Sandroni and G. Ferri. 1995. Biomanipulationof trophic chain in two small eutrophiclakes. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 53: 157-175.
  45. Vollenweider, R.A. 1976. Advances in defining criticalload levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication.Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 33: 53-83.