한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)
- 제22권2호
- /
- Pages.163-172
- /
- 2003
- /
- 1598-3099(pISSN)
- /
- 2733-8436(eISSN)
초등 과학 교과서에서 창의적 문제해결력 분석특 개발과 적용 - 5, 6학년 1학기 교과서를 중심으로 -
Development and Application of a Creative Problem Solving Analysis Framework for Elementary School Science Textbook - Focused on the 5th and 6th grade 1st semester -
- Kim, Hyun-Jeong (Kyonggi Yongjeong Elementary School) ;
- Choe, Seon-Yeong (Incheon Ilshin Elementary School) ;
- Kang, Ho-Kam (Kyeongin National Univ. of Education)
- 발행 : 2003.08.01
초록
The purpose of this study was to develop the analytic framework of Creative Problem Solving(CPS) for elementary school science textbook. For this purpose, we developed the framework based on the theories of problem, definition of problem solving and various kinds of CPS model. The six elements of the framework for content analysis were extracted through theoretical examination: problem introduction, problem statement, solution thinking, formulating hypothesis, testing hypothesis, and assessment. The developed framework was applied to the extbooks for the 5th and the 6th grades 1st semester in elementary science textbook of the 7th national curriculum. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The scores of the framework for content analysis in the 5th grade were slightly higher than those of the 6th grade, but there were no significant difference. 2. The comparison of the scores between the elements of the framework was found that the scores on the elements of testing hypothesis and formulating hypothesis were higher than those of the other elements. 3. The comparison of the scores between the units was found that the scores of the framework for the 9th unit (“trip of water”) of the 5th grade were higher than those of the other units, which were presented lower level than 1.0 (50.0%) score of the framework. 4. The comparison of the scores between the intensive course and the regular coures in the 6th grade textbook was showed that the scores on the intensive course were higher than the basic course. In conclusions, it was found that the problem introduction and problem statement in the textbook should be amended, and that various information and activities should be presented in the textbook.