사고양식과 학업성취의 관계에 대한 과학고생과 일반학생의 차이

Difference of the science and the general high school for the relation of thinking style and academic achievement

  • 발행 : 2003.09.01

초록

본 연구는 과학고와 일반고의 사고양식의 차이를 학업성취와 관련하여 검증하였다. 과학고 122명, 일반고 93명 등 총 211명을 대상으로 연구를 한 결과, 주요 내용은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 과학고와 일반고 학생들의 사고 양식이 다른 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 과학고생이 일반학생보다 학업성취를 설명하는 다양한 사고양식이 존재하였다. 그리고, 과학고의 경우, 경로분석을 통해서 지능이 전체 성취에 직접적 영향을 미칠 뿐만 아니라 사법적 사고 양식과 군주적 사고양식을 통해서도 간접적 영향을 미치고 있었다. 끝으로 과학영재의 사고양식의 특성을 통해서, 현 과학영재교육의 개선과 방향에 대하여 시사점을 제공하였다.

This study verified the differences of thinking styles between science highschool students and general students in reference to academic achievement. The subjects of this study are 211 high school students, who were composed of 122 science school students and 93 general school students. The significant results of this study are as follows: First, science highschool students showed more distinguishable differences in thinking style than general highschool students. Second, the former rather than the latter is revealed to be more variable in thinking styles explaining academic achievement. Next, in case of science highschool students, thinking style which is affected by intelligence is turned out to be an indirect factor influencing academic achievement. Finally, I verified the importance of distinction of science highschool students and the usefulness of thinking styles, gave suggestions on the reformation and direction of current school education of science-gifted students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김소연(2000). Sternberg의 지능 및 사고양식 이론의 타당화. 석사학위 논문. 숙명여자대학교
  2. 박도순, 하대현, 성태제(2000). 신종합지능검사 요강(고등학생용). 사단법인 대학사립 중고등학교장회.
  3. 배미란, 한기순, 박인호(2002). 과학영재들의 사고양식과 5인성 요인간의 관계. 영재교육연구, 13(1), 43-63
  4. 윤미선(1997). 사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구- Sternberg의 정신자치제 이론을 중심으로-. 석사학위 논문. 고려대학교
  5. Arlin, P. K.(1989). Problem finding and problem solving in young artist and young scientists. In M. L. Commons, J. D. Sinnott, F. A. Richards, & Armon (Eds.) , Beyond formal operations 11: Comparisons and applications of adolescent and adult developmental models. New York: Praeger
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self' A psychology for the third millennium. New York: Harper Collins
  7. Dai, D. Yun, & Feldhusen, J. F.(1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory: Implication for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21, 302-308 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553981
  8. Feldhusen, J. F.(1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidsont(Eids), Conceptions of giftedness (pp.112-127). New York: Cambridge University Press
  9. Gallagher, J. J., & Courtright, R. D.(1986). The educational definition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  10. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. L.(1995). Thinking Styles. In Donald H. Saklofske & Moshe Zeidner(Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. NY: Plenum Press
  11. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. L.(1997). Are Cognitive Styles in Style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
  12. Ho, H. K. 1998). Assessing thinking styles in theory of mental self-government: a mini validity study in a Hong Kong secondary school(Unpublished manuscript). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong
  13. Humphreys, L. G.(1986). Describing the elephant. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman(Eds.), What is intelligence?(pp. 97-100). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
  14. Platow, J. K.(1984). A handbook for identifying the gifted and talented Ventura County Superintendent School Office
  15. Renzulli, J. S.(1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press
  16. Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts, and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  17. Sternberg, R. J.(1988). Mental Self-Government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224 https://doi.org/10.1159/000275810
  18. Sternberg, R. J.(1990). Thinking Styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 366-371
  19. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K.(1991). MSG Thinking Styles Inventory Mannual. Unpublished manuscript
  20. Sternberg, R. J.(1994). Thinking Styles: theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & Patrica Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence. NY: Cambridge University Press
  21. Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Thinking styles. NY: Cambridge University Press
  22. Sternberg, R. J.. & Grigorenko, E. L(1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal of High Ability, 6, 1-9
  23. Tannenbaum, A. J.(1979). Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about the gifted. In A. H. Passow(Ed), The gifted and talented. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education
  24. Tannenbaum, A. J.(2000). A history of giftedness in school and society. In K. A, Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed.). London: Elsevier
  25. T'so, S. M.(1998). Correlational study of thinking styles and academic achievement. A term paper submitted for a master's in Education degree course. The University of Hong Kong
  26. Van Tassel-Baska, J.(1998). Disadvantaged learners with talent. In, J. Van Tassel-Baska(Ed), Gifted and talented leamers(pp. 95-114). Denver: Love Publishing
  27. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J.(1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students. Educational Research Journal, 13, 41-62
  28. Zhang, L. F.(1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. The Journal of psychology, 133, 165-181 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599731
  29. Zhang, L. F.(2001). Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong secondary school student? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 289-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00136-7