Global DNA Methylation of Porcine Embryos during Preimplantation Development

  • Yeo, S.E. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB), Department of Biology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Y.K. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Koo, D.B. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Han, J.S. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Yu, K. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Kim, C.H. (Department of Biology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, H. (Department of Biotechnology, Taegu University) ;
  • Chang, W.K. (National Livestock Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, K.K. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB)) ;
  • Han, Y.M. (Laboratory of Development and Differentiation, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology(KRIBB))
  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

DNA methylation at CpG sites, which is a epigenetic modification, is associated with gene expression without change of DNA sequences. During early mouse embryogenesis, dynamic changes of DNA methylation occur. In this study, DNA methylation patterns of porcine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro were examined at various developmental stages by the immunocytochemical staining method. Interestingly, active demethylation was not observed on the paternal pronucleus of porcine zygotes. However, differences were detected in the passive demethylation process between in vivo and in vitro embryos. There was no change in the DNA methylation state until the blastocyst stage of in vivo embryos, whereas partial demethylation was observed in several blastomeres from a 4 cell stage to a morula stage of in vitro embryos. The whole genome of inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) cells in porcine blastocysts were evenly methylated without de novo methylation. Our findings demonstrate that genome-wide demethylation does not occur in pig embryos during preimplantation development unlike murine and bovine embryos. It indicates that the machinery regulating epigenetic reprogramming may be different between species.

Keywords

References

  1. Abeydeera, L. R., and B. N. Day. 1997. Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified trisbuffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. BioI. Reprod. 57:729-734 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.4.729
  2. Cardoso, M. C., and Leonhardt, H. 1999. DNA methyltransferase is actively retained in the cytoplasm during early development. J. Cell. BioI. 147:25-32
  3. Carlson, L. L., Page, A. W. and Bestor, T. H. 1992. Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting Genes. Dev. 6:2536-2541
  4. Dean, W., Santos, F., Stojkovic, M., Zakhartchenko, V., Walter, J., Wolf, E. and Reik, W. 2001. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 98:13734-13738
  5. Feil, R. 2001. Early-embryonic culture and manipulation could affect genomic imprinting. Trends. Mol. Med. 7:245-246
  6. Funahashi, H., Cantley, T. C., Stumpf, T. T., Terlouw, S. L. and Day, B. N. 1994. In vitro development of in vitro-matured porcine oocytes following chemical activation or in vitro fertilization. BioI. Reprod. 50:1072-1077 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod50.5.1072
  7. Howell, C. Y., Bestor, T. H., Ding, F., Latham, K. E., Mertineit, C., Trasler, J. M. and Chaillet, J. R. 2001. Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmtl gene. Cell. 104:829-838 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00280-X
  8. Jaenisch, R. 1997. DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? Trends. Genet. 13:323-329
  9. Jaenisch, R., and Bird, A. 2003. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 33 Suppl:245-254 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1089
  10. Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R. and Haaf, T. 2000. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature. 403:501-502
  11. Memili, E. and First, N. L. 2000. Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species. Zygote. 8:87-96
  12. Nakazawa, Y., Shimada, A., Noguchi, J., Domeki, I., Kaneko, H. and Kikuchi, K. 2002. Replacement of nuclear protein by histone in pig sperm nuclei during in vitro fertilization. Reproduction. 124:565-572 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1240565
  13. Nonchev, S. and Tsanev, R. 1990. Protamine-histone replacement and DNA replication in the male mouse pronucleus. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 25:72-76
  14. Oswald, J., Engemann, S, Lane, N., Mayer, W., Olek, A., Fundele, R., Dean, W., Reik, W. and Walter, J. 2000. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr Biol. 10:475-478 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00448-6
  15. Petters, R. M. and Wells, K. D. 1993. Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 48:61-73
  16. Rougier, N., Bourc'his, D., Gomes, D. M., Niveleau, A., Plachot, M., Paldi, A. and Viegas-Pequignot, E. 1998. Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. Genes. Dev. 12:2108-2113
  17. Santos, F., Hendrich, B., Reik, W. and Dean, W. 2002. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 241:172-182 https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0501
  18. Shi, W. and Haaf, T. 2002. Aberrant methylation patterns at the two-cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 63:329-334 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.90016
  19. Shimada, A., Kikuchi, K., Noguchi, J., Akama, K., Nakano, M. and Kaneko, H. 2000. Protamine dissociation before decondensation of sperm nuclei during in vitro fertilization of pig oocytes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 120:247-256 https://doi.org/10.1530/reprod/120.2.247
  20. Watanabe, D., Suetake, I., Tada, T. and Tajima, S. 2002. Stage- and cell-specific expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b during embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 118:187-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00242-3