Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Selecting on the Preferred Alternatives of MADM with the­smaller­the­better or the­larger­the­better Characteristics using SN Ratios

SN비를 이용한 다수의 망소/망대특성을 가지는 MADM 문제의 선호대안 선정

  • 이강인 (전주대학교 공학부 산업공학)
  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose an interactive method using the concept of Signal­to­Noise (SN) ratios and cutting ranges for selecting the most preferred alternatives of Multiple­attribute Decision­Making(MADM) with the­smaller­the­better or the­larger­the­better characteristics. In this method the decision makers could make a grouping of attributes by their priorities. This research is based on the assumption of an equality between the attributes of MADM with the characteristics of Taguchi method. As a result, this interactive method could transform the characteristic value of Taguchi method into the size of SN ratios which are relatively easy to understand by decision makers.

Keywords

References

  1. 박성현, 박영현(1995), 「통계적 품질관리」 ,민영사, pp.573-592
  2. 이강인(1998), "다구찌의 손실함수를 이용한 다망목특성을 가지는 의사결정문제의 최적선호대안 결정", '대한산업공학회지', 제24권, 제4호, pp.493-502
  3. 이강인, 강인순(1998), "다구찌 방법을 이용한 망목특성의 선호설비 선택", '대한설비관리학회지' , 제3권, 제2호, pp.19-27
  4. 이강인, 서재훈, 오기영(2001), "SN비를 이용한 다혼합특성문제의 최적 선호대안 선정", '한국품질경영학회 춘계학술대회',pp.575-581
  5. 이강인, 이진식(1998), '혼합 다속성 의사결정문제에서 선호설비의 선정', '대한설비관리학회지' , 제3권, 제1호, pp.243-255
  6. 이강인, 조성구(1995), 선호종속을 허용하는다속성 의사결정문제의 대화형 접근방법",'한국경영과학회지', 제20권, 제2호, pp.61-76
  7. 조성구, 이강인(1997), "퍼지 Choquet적분을이용한 다속성 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 결정", '대한산업공학회지', 제23권, 제4호, pp.635-643
  8. Barron, H., and Schmidt, C. P.(1988),"Sensitivity Analysis of AdditiveMuIti-attribute Value Models", Operations Research, Vol.36, pp.122-127 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.36.1.122
  9. Hwang, C. L, and Yoon, K. S.(1981),"Multiple Attribute Decision Making",Lecture Notes in Economics andMathematioal Systems, Springer-Verlag,New York
  10. Kackar, R. N.(1985), "Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method", JournaI of QuaIityTechnology, Vol.17, pp.21-29
  11. Korhonen, P. J.(1986), "A HierarchicalInteractive Method for RankingAlternatives with Multiple QualitativeCriteria", European JournaI of OperationaI Research, Vol. 24, pp.265-276 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90049-4
  12. Mareschal, B., and Brans, J. P.(1988),"(Geometrical Representations for MCDA",Europeon Journal of OperationaI Research, Vol.34, pp.69-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0
  13. Olson, D. L.(1996), Decision Aids for Selection Problems, Splinger-Verlag, NewYork
  14. Peace, G. S.,(1993), Taguchi Method, Addison-Wesley, Inc. Australia
  15. Taguchi, G.(1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Production Organization, Tokyo
  16. Roy, R.(1990), A Primer on the Taguchi Method, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Inc.New York
  17. Valls, A., and Torra, V.(2000), "UsingClassification as an Aggregation Tool inMCDM", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.115, pp.159-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00029-9
  18. Vansnik, J. C.(1986), "On the Problem of Weights in Multiple Chteria DecisionMaking(The Noncompensatory Approach)",Europeon Journal of Operational Research,Vol.24, pp.288-294 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90051-2
  19. Wu, F.C.(2002), "Optimization of MultipleQuality Characteristics Based on PercentageReduction of Taguchi's Quality Loss"The International journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.20,pp.749-753 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200233
  20. Yang, J. B., and Singh, M. G.(1994), "AnEvidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty", IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.24,No.1, pp.1-16 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681
  21. Zanakis, H. Z. Solomon, A., Wishart, N.,Dublish, S.(1998), "Multi-Attribute DecisionMaking:A Simulation Comparison of Select Methods", European Journat of Operational Research, Vol.107, pp.507-529 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
  22. Zeleny, M.(1982), MuItipte CriteriaDecision Making, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York