A Study on Recognition of Magazine Advertisements Due to Interaction Effects of Between Usage of Fashion Illustrations and Photographs

패션 일러스트레이션을 이용한 잡지광고와 사진을 이용한 잡지광고의 상호작용에 의한 재인에 관한 연구

  • 노윤선 (동서대학교 패션디자인학) ;
  • 박민여 (경희대학교 의상학과)
  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

Despite the creative strengths fashion illustrations, most fashion related advertisements use photographs instead. Furthermore, there is not much study done on the effects of fashion illustrations. Through this study the authors discover the effectiveness of fashion related magazine advertisements using fashion illustrations by looking into the level of recognition due to interaction effects between advertisements using photographs and advertisements using fashion illustrations. This study, however, does not focus on comparing the different levels of recognition effect between photographs and fashion illustrations. After a literature review of magazines with high rank subscriptions, an experiments was conducted. A booklet was made using 16 fashion illustration advertisements and 16 photograph advertisements all designed to control variables other than advertisement type. Then a survey was taken using the booklet to measure the recognition levels of the different types of advertisements. Through an ANOVA test of the 2 ${\times}$ 3 factorial designed model the authors derived results implying that interaction effects do exist between the different types of advertisements. In the environment where advertisements using photographs dominate, advertisements using fashion illustrations can effectively be recognised by the consumers. Through this study, the authors wish to give guidance to decision makers in the fashion industry related to the type of printed advertisement they should seek.

Keywords

References

  1. Jacob, J., Speller D. E., and Kohn, C. A. (1974). Brand choice behaviour as a function of information load. Journal of Marketing Research. 11. pp. 63-69
  2. Ha, L. (1996). Observations: Advertising clutter in consumer magazines: Dimension and effects. Journal of Advertising Research. pp. 76-84
  3. Burke, R. R. and Srull, T. K. (1988). Competitive inference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research. 15. pp. 55-68
  4. Stewart, D. W., C. Peckrnann, S. Ratneshwar, J. Stroud, and B. Bryant. (1985). Methodological and theoretical foundations of advertising copytesting : A review. Current Issues end Research in Advertising. 2, pp, 71-74
  5. Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly. 29. pp. 349-356
  6. Zielske, H. A. (1982). Does day-after recall penalize feeling ads? Journal of Advertising Research. 20. pp. 7-13
  7. Kent, Robert J. and Chris T. Allen. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing. 58. July. pp. 97-105
  8. Aaker, David A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: Free Press
  9. Rachford, B. T. (1987). New insights about the FCB grid. Journal of Advertising Research. 27(August-September). pp, 24-38
  10. Kent, Robert J. and Chris T. Allen. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing. 58. July. pp, 97-105
  11. McKracken, J. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? cultural foundation of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16. pp. 310-321
  12. Baker M. J. and Churchil, G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research. 14. pp. 535-555 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151194
  13. Joseph, W. B. (1982). The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising. 11(3). pp, 16-54
  14. 장대련, 한민희 (1994). 광고경영론, 서울: 학연사. pp. 330-335
  15. Kent, R. J. and Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing. 58(July). pp. 97-105
  16. Klatzky, R. L. (1980). Human memory: Structure and processes(2nd ed.). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. p. 94