한국동물위생학회지 (Korean Journal of Veterinary Service)

  • 제26권1호
  • /
  • Pages.73-80
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 3022-7372(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7630(eISSN)
한국동물위생학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Service)
권호 표지

Experimental infection in guinea pig with foot and mouth disease virus

  • Abdul-Ahad (Sylhet Government Veterinary College) ;
  • Rahman, Md-Siddiqur (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Rahman, Md-Mostafizur (Department of Microbiology & Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Baek, Byeong-Kirl (College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, John-Hwa (College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2003.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In order to obtain information on murine model for foot and mouth disease virus(FMDV) type Asia 1, we studied whether guinea pig was a suitable model for studying FMDV. Apparently healthy 3 months old albino guinea pigs and unweaned 3 days old Swiss albino mice were used for this study. Total of 8 guinea pigs were divided into the infected(n=5) and control(n=3) groups. The incubation period of FMDV in the guinea pigs were roughly 2 days and the viremia persisted for 3 days in the guinea pigs. Mice inoculated with the plasma from control guinea pigs did not show any sign of viremia. The plasma were titrated by virus neutralization test using suckling mice as an indicator host. The mean virus neutralizing antibody titers of infected guinea pig at 3 DPI, 4 DPI and 5 DPI were log$\_$10/2.16, log$\_$10/ 3.39 and log$\_$10/ 3.44, respectively whereas there was no neutralizing antibody titer in control group. The difference between the mortality pattern and mean virus neutralizing antibody titer of infected and that of control group at day 3, 4, 5 were statistically significant(p<0.0l).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kitching RP. 1992. Bovine Medicine: Diseases and Husbandry of Cattle. Oxford : Blackwell Scientific
  2. Howard SC, Donnelly CA. 2000. The importance of immediate destruction in epidemics of foot and mouth disease. Res Vet Sci 69:189-196 https://doi.org/10.1053/rvsc.2000.0415
  3. Butchaiah G, Card JL, Morgan DO, et al. 1992. Antigenic relationships of foot and mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1 isolates demonstrated by monoclonal antibodies. Vet Immunopathol 30(2-3):275-292
  4. Islam A, Jalil MA, Chowdhury KA, et al. 1985. Prevalence of different strains (types) of foot and mouth disease virus in Bangladesh. Livestock Adv 10:54-56
  5. Chowdhury SMZH, Rahman MF, Rahman MB, et al. 1996. Strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus in different districts of Bangladesh. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci 9:315-317
  6. Tulsiram P, Tyagi M, Srinivas K, et al. 1997. Antigenic variation in foot and mouth disease virus type Asia 1 isolates circulated during 1993-95 in India. Virus Genes 15(3):247-253 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007984621839
  7. Doughty WJ, Gleeson LJ, Prasatsuwan K, et al. 1995. Serological comparison of type Asia 1 foot and mouth disease virus isolates from Thailand. Rev Sci Tech 14(3):539-546
  8. Hafez SM, Farag MA, Mazloum KS, et al. 1994. Serological survey of foot and mouth disease in Saudi Arabia. Rev Sci Tech 13(3):711-719
  9. Hedger RS, Barnett IT, Gray DF, et al. 1980. Some virus diseases of domestic animals in the Sultanate of Oman. Trop Anim Health Prod 12(2):107-114 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242618
  10. Arshadi M, Maldjaii H. 1976. The foot and mouth disease situation in Iran. Dev Biol Stand 35:451-417
  11. Ferris NP, Donaldson AI, Shrestha RM, et al. 1992. A review of foot and mouth disease in Nepal. Rev Sci Tech 11(3):685-698
  12. Dimitriadis IA, Delimpaltas P. 1992. Epizootiology of foot and mouth disease during a quarter century(1962-1988). Berl Mumch Tierarztl Wochenschr 105(3):90-95
  13. Borca M, Fernandez F, Sadir A, et al. 1986. Immune response to foot and mouth disease virus in a murine model: effective thymus-independent primary and secondary reaction. Immunology 59:261-267
  14. Waldmann 0, Pape J. 1920. Die kunstliche Ubertragung der Maul-und Klauenseuche auf das Meerschweinchen. Berl. Tieraertz. Wochenschr 36:519-520
  15. Richard CK, Christopher MG, Arther AA, et al. 1979. Immunity to foot and mouth disease virus in guinea pigs: Clinical and Immune Responses. Infect Immun 24(3):787-792
  16. Rohrer H, Olchnowitz AF. 1980. Infektionskrankheiten und ihre Erreger, Band 18: Maulund Klauenseuche G Fischer, jena : 109-116
  17. Dus Santos MJ, Wigdorovitz A, Maradei E, et al. 2000. A comparison of methods for measuring the antibody in mice and cattle following vaccination against foot and mouth disease. Vet Res Commun 24(4):261-273 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006450900739
  18. Cunha RG., Baptista J, Serrao JUM, et al. 1957. El uso de los ratones lactantes en la evaluacion de los anticuerpos contra el virus de la fiebre aftosa y su singificacion inmunologica. Gaceta Veterinaria 19:243-267
  19. Cunha RG., Honigman MM. 1963. A comparison of serum test in mice for the detection of foot and mouth disease antibody. Am J Vet Res 99:371-375
  20. Gomes I, Astudillo V. 1975. Foot and mouth disease: evaluation of mouse protection test results in relation to cattle immunity. Boletin Centro Panamericano Aftosa 17:9-16
  21. Mulcahy G, Pullen LA, Gale C, et al. 1991. Mouse protection test as a predictor of the protective capacity of synthetic foot and mouth disease vaccines. Vaccine 9:19-24.
  22. Ahad A, Rahman MS, Rahman MM, et al. 1998. Production of hyperimmune sera against foot and mouth disease virus type Asia 1 and 0 in guinea pigs. Progress Agril 9(1-2):69-71
  23. Skinner HH. 1953. One week old mice as test animals in foot and mouth disease research. Proc 15 th Intemat Vet Congrees Stockolm, Sweden, 1:195-199.
  24. Lopez O, Sadir A, Borca M, et al. 1990. Immune response to foot and mouth disease virus in an experimental murine model. II. Basis of persistent antibody reaction. Vet Immunol Immunopaihol 24:313-321
  25. Fontaine J, Dubouclard C, Banarel P, et al. 1966. Vaccination of sheep against foot and mouth disease. Study of methods for testing immunity. Bull Off Int Epiz 65:195-212
  26. Charan S, Prasad S. 1981. A note of an assessment of post viremia as an index of protective immunity in pig against Foot and mouth disease. Zentbl Vet Med B28:260-262
  27. Skinner HH. 1951. Propagation of strains of foot and mouth disease virus in unweaned white mice. Proc Roy Soc Med 44:1041-1044
  28. Sharma SK. 1979. Foot and mouth disease viremia in sheep. Indian Vet Med J 3:93-95
  29. Auge de Mellow P, Sutmoller P. 1977. Preliminary observations on pharyngeal virus growth and viremia after intradermolingual inoculation of cattle with foot and mouth disease virus. Bol Cent Panamer Fibre Aftosa 27/28:19-22
  30. Moussa AAM, Stouraitis P, Ibrahim MH, et al. 1977. Foot and mouth disease vaccine production in baby hamster kidney cells suspension in Egypt. Bull Off Int Epiz 81:1043-1054
  31. Dellers RW, Hyde JL. 1964. Response of sheep to experimental infection with Foot and mouth disease virus. Am J Vet Res 25:469-473
  32. Rivenson S, Segura M, Zakin MM, et al. 1966. Antibodies in sheep experimentally infected with or vaccinated against Foot and mouth disease virus. Revta Fac Cienc Vet La Plata 8:53-58
  33. Dhenin L, Gicquel B, Labie J, et al. 1979. Time taken by foot and mouth disease virus to appear in the muscles of swine. Bull Soc Vet Hell 30:39-46
  34. Som TL, Bhattacharya HM, Nandi SN, et al. 1980. Studies on viremia following experimental inoculation of pseudorabies virus in rabbits. Indian J Anim Hlth 19:45-46
  35. Mastan B, Dabouchard C. 1967. Viremia in sheep inoculated with aphthous fever virus. Bull Aca Vet 40:419-426
  36. Fernandez F, Borca M, Sadir A, Fondevila N, Mayo J, Schudel A, et al. 1986. Foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) experimental infection: susceptibility and immune response of adult mice. Vet Microbiol 12:15-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(86)90037-4
  37. Perryman LE, O'rourke KI, McGuire TC, et al. 1988. Immune response are required to terminate viremia in equine infectious anemia lentivirus infection. J Virol 62:3073-3076
  38. Van Bekkum JG. 1970. Correlation between serum antibody level and protection against challenge with FMD virus. Report of the meeting of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, (FAO, Brescia) : 38
  39. Pay TWF, Hingley PH, Radlett PJ, et al. 1983. The correlation between the 146S antigen dose with the serum neutralizing antibody response and with protection from challenge induced by FMD vaccines. Report of the Meeting of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease(Lelystad, Netherlands), (FAO, Rome)
  40. Mathur BBL, Butchia G, Vasantha S, et al. 1981. Note on antibody to cattle to foot and mouth disease monovalent type O vaccine. Indian J Anim Sci 51:109-110
  41. Nair SP, Sen AK. 1993. Studies on the antibody response in sheep to aluminium hydroxide gel saponified foot and mouth types Asia 1 and 0 vaccine. Indian J Virol 9:111-119