DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on European Container Terminal Operation System

  • Published : 2003.08.01

Abstract

As the competition in the liner shipping industry is becoming fiercer, the shipping company is trying to find the way to keep the best competitive position by reducing the cost level as low as possible and offering the best quality of service to their customer. In order to achieve this goal, the selection of port and terminal that have the best quality of service and cost effective structure is essential for the shipping line, where they can only have a chance to save the money. In this context, the paper compares three European container terminals in order to understand the factors that have to be considered in the decision making process for the selection of terminal. And its advantages and disadvantages of each type of container terminal operation system were analyzed from the liner shipping company's point of view in terms of cost, time, flexibility, stability, hinterland connection, geographical position and terminal productivity. It is obvious that the cost factors are very important for liner shipping company to select their terminal. However, there might be even more important factors than the cost factors, such as quality of port and terminal service, mutual trust, and possibility of future development.

Keywords

References

  1. Baird, B., (1996), 'Containerization and the Decline of the Upstream Urban Port in Europe', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 145-156 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839600000071
  2. Fleming, D, Hayuth, Y., (1993), 'Spatial Characteristics of Transportation Hubs: centrality and intermediacy', Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(94)90030-2|
  3. Goss, R. O., (1990), 'Economic Policies and Seaports 4; strategies for port authority', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 273-287 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839000000033
  4. Haezendonck, E., Pison, G., Rousseeuw, P., Struyo, A., and Verbeke, A. (2000), 'The Competitive Advantage of Seaports'. International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol. II, No.2, pp. 69-81 https://doi.org/10.1057/ijme.2000.8
  5. Hayuth, Y., Flemming, D. (1994), 'Concepts of Strategic Commercial Location: the case of container ports'. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 187-193 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839400000042
  6. Heaver, T. D. (1995), 'The Implications of Increased Competition among Ports for Port Policy and Management', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.22, No. 2, pp.125-133 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839500000045
  7. Jung, S. H. (1999), Analysis of Private Container Terminal Operation. MSc Dissertation, Korea Maritime Univ., Pusan, South Korea
  8. McCalla, R. J. (1994), 'Canadian Container: how have they fared? How will they do?', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 207-217 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839400000044
  9. Miyajima, M., KWak, K. S., (1989), 'Economic Analysis of Interport Competition in Container Cargo: peripheral ports versus Tokyo bay ports', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 47-55 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838900000023
  10. Notteboom, T., (1997), 'Concentration and Loadcentre Development in the European Container Port System', Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 95-115 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00072-5
  11. Notteboom, T., Coeck, C., Verbeke, A., and Winkelmans, W. (1997), 'Containerization and the Corrpetitive Potential of Upstream Urban Ports in Europe', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 285-289 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839700000031
  12. Slack, B. (1985), 'Containerization, Inter-port competition, and Port Selection'. Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 293-303 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838500000043
  13. Notteboom, T., Comotis, C. and Sletmo, G. (1996), 'Shipping Line as Agents of Change in the Port Industry', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 289-300 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839600000090
  14. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (1992), Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation Port, UNCTAD.