DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EFFECT OF A REWETTING AGENT ON DENTIN ADHESION

재습윤제의 적용이 상아질 접착에 미치는 효과

  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Yil-Yoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박일윤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 이영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2003.01.01

Abstract

This study compared the dentin adhesion to composite resin according to air-dry, blot dry, application of rewetting agent on air-dry or blot dry dentin surface by microleakag test and SEM observation. For microleakage test, class V cavity preparations with dentinal margins were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 40 extracted human molars. For SEM observation, occlusal dentin of 20 extracted human molars were exposed. After etched the dentin, prepared teeth were randomly divided into four groups; D group: air dry for 10-15 sec., B group: blot dry with moist cotton pellet, D-R group: air dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec., B-R group: blot dry and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20 sec. Treated cavities and surfaces were filled or constructed using One-Step adhesives and Aelitefil composite resins. Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours. For microleakage test, the specimens were thermocycled and soaked into 2% methylene blue. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kuskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests. For SEM observation, the specimens were bisectioned mesiodiatally. After decalcified and deproteinized, specimens were observed under SEM. The results of this study were as follows; 1. The microleakges on dentinal margin were the highest in D group compared with B group, D-R group, and B-R group(p<0.05). But there was no significant difference between B group, D-R group and B-R group. 2. D group showed gap and a few resin tags between dentin and composite resin. 3 B group, D-R group, and B-R groups showed close adaptation between dentin and composite resin. It showed that resin rags in B group were numerous and long, in D-R group were few and short, in B-R group were numerous and short or long. 4. Adhesive layer showed in D-R group ($10{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$) and B-R group ($3{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$) In conclusion, use of rewetting agent to dry dentin was efficient to dentin adhesion, also it did not provide reverse effect on blot dry dentin.

Keywords

References

  1. Applequist EA, Meiers JC : Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite restorations. Quint Int 4 : 253-258, 1996
  2. Mehl A. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH : Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured comlpposites with and without sofstart polymerization. J Dent 25 : 321-330, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00044-9
  3. Taylor MJ, Lynch E : Microleakage: Review. J Dent 20 : 3-10, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90002-T
  4. Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M : Permeability and microleakage of class II resin composite resin restorations. J Dent 22 : 49-56, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90147-3
  5. Bauer JF, Henson JL : Microleakage a measure of the performance of direct filling materials. Oper Dent 9 : 2-9, 1984
  6. Kidd EAM : Microleakage: a review. J Dent 4 : 199-205, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(76)90048-8
  7. Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchell S : Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 13(2) : 93-97, 2000
  8. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr. AL : Microleakage of hydrophillic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1) : 31-34, 2001
  9. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I : Bond strength of single bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 2-10, 2000
  10. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E : The promotion of adhesion by infiltratrion of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16 : 265-273, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307
  11. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Schneider H, Duschner H, Dorfer CE : Effect of intrapulpal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strenghts and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent 14(5) : 319-323, 2001
  12. Gallo JR. Henderson M, Burgess JO : Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 13(5) : 267-270, 2000
  13. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based. single-bottle primer-adhesives. Dent Mater 12 : 236-244, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
  14. Kanca J : Effect of drying on bonding strength. J Dent Res 70 : 304(Abstract 1029). 1991
  15. Gwinnett AJ : Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5 : 127-129, 1992
  16. Gwinnett AJ : Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7(3) : 144-148, 1994
  17. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J : Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 5 : 73-77, 1992
  18. Kanca J : Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quint Int 23(1) : 39-41, 1992
  19. Kanca J : Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5 : 213-215, 1992
  20. Kanca J : Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9 : 273-276, 1996
  21. Kanca J. Sandrik J : Bonding to dentin, clues to the mechanism of adhesion. Am J Dent 11 : 154-159, 1998
  22. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Cloe BC : Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 6 : 61-64, 1993
  23. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA : Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetonebased dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11 : 207-213, 1999
  24. Miears JR, Charlton DG, Hermesch CB : Effect of dentin moisture and storage time on resin bonding. Am J Dent 8 : 80-82, 1995
  25. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo ARP, Dutra HR : In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strength of one-bottle adhesives. J Esth Rest Dent 14(1) : 31-38, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00145.x
  26. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Micromorphological spectrum of acid conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater 14 : 329-338, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00046-3
  27. Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW : The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15 : 282-295, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00049-4
  28. Saunders WP, Saunders EM : Microleakage of bonding agents with wet versus dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 9 : 34-36, 1996
  29. Santini A, Mitchell S : Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 11 : 219-224, 1998
  30. Santini A, Mitchell S : Microleakage of composite Esht Dent 10 : 296-304, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1998.tb00507.x
  31. Ritter AV : Re-wetting agents for dentin bonding. J Esth Rest Dent 13(6) : 387-395. 2001 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb01024.x
  32. Swift EJ : Resin desensitizers. J Esth Dent 11(6) : 289-290, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00412.x
  33. Gwinnett AJ : Chemically conditioned dentin: a comparison of conventional and environmental scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater 10 : 150-155, 1994
  34. Peschke A, Blunck U. Roulet JF : Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of class V restorations. Am J Dent 13(5) : 239-244 2000
  35. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY: Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible re-wetting. Am J Dent 10 : 77-82, 1997
  36. Ritter AV. Heymann HO, Swift Jr. EJ, Perdigao J, Rosa BT : Effects of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esth Dent 12(2) : 85-96, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
  37. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M : Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73 : 1690-1702, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730110401
  38. Alani AH. Toh CG : Detection of microleakage around dental restoration: a review. Oper Dent 22 : 173-185, 1997
  39. Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L : Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite class II restoration: an in vitro evaluation. Quint Int 10: 717-727, 1995
  40. Mangum FI. Berry EA. DeSchepper E : Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent 42 : 304-308, 1994
  41. Rossomando JJ, Wendt SLJ : Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 11 : 47-51, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80008-5
  42. Gladys S. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechets P, Vanherle G : Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14(3) : 170-176, 2001
  43. Setien VJ, Cobb D, Denehy GE, Vargas M : Cavity preparation devices: Effect on microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(3) : 157-162, 2001
  44. Barnes, DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, et. al. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 19 : 133-137, 1994
  45. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH : The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA. and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 75 : 1851-1858, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750110601
  46. Santini A : Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. J Dent 12(4) : 194-200, 1999
  47. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami J, Pashley DH : Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13(6) : 354-328, 2000
  48. Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harnirattisai C : Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent 18 : 8-16, 1993
  49. Sugizaki J : The effects of various primers on dentin adhesion of resin composites. SEM and TEM observation of the resin impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primer. Jap J Cons Dent 34 : 228-265, 1991
  50. Watanabe I, Takarada K, Nakabayashi N : Adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to dentin pretreated with phosphoric acid. J Jap Dent Mater 10 : 671-677, 1997
  51. Xu J. Stangel I, Butler IS, Gilson DFR : An FT-Raman spectroscopic investigation of dentin and collagen surface modified by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Dent Res 76 : 596-601, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760011101
  52. Di Renzo M, Ellis T. Domingue A. Bertrand L. Sacher E, Stangel I : Chemical reactions between dentin and bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 74: 115-121, 1994
  53. Harashima I. Hirasawa T : Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J 9 : 36-46, 1990 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.9.36
  54. Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E : Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 63 : 1087-1089, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630081701
  55. Nakabayashi N, Watanae A, Gendusa NJ : Dentin adhesion of modified 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: function of HEMA. Dent Mater 8 : 259-264, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90096-U
  56. Suzuke K, Takahashi M, Nakai H : Treatment of dentin by aqueous solution of amino acid derivatives : HEMA. J Adhes Dent 8 :43-51, 1990
  57. Itoh K, Wakumoto S : Momentary pretreatment by 35% HEMA solution combined with five marketed bonding agents. Dent Mater J 6 : 28-31, 1987 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.6.28
  58. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A : Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 569-575, 2001

Cited by

  1. Effect of rewetting agent on dentinal microtensile bond strength vol.29, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.153