Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers (조명전기설비학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of IIIuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers (한국조명전기설비학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Evaluation Structure of luminous Environment in o residential space and office work space

주거.사무공간의 조명환경 평가구조에 관한 연구

  • 이선영 (진주산업대학교 건축학과)
  • Published : 2003.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is to find the difference of evaluation structure between a residential space and of ace work space and to examine a relation between mood item and behavior items on evaluation of the luminous environment. First 20 mood items md 15 behavior items were selected for evaluation item on the luminous environment. And then, subjective evaluation was experimented by the semantic differential method. The results are as follows: (1) In respect of evaluation un the mood both luminous environments that have each different character of space at evaluated by the three factors; activity, comfort and quality. (2) In respect of evaluation on the behavior, three factors, work, relaxation and entertainment are selected in the residential space and two factors, work and non-work are selected in the office work space. (3) In the residential space, activity is very important factor that affects on three behaviors, work, relaxation and entertainment. In the office work space, activity affects on work and quality affects on non-work.

본 연구는 공간 특성이 서로 다른 주거공간과 사무공간의 조명환경 평가구조에 어떠한 차이가 있는지를 파악하고, 분위기항목과 행위항목과의 관계를 정립하는데 목적을 두고 먼저 조명환경에 대한 평가항목으로써 20개의 분위기항목과 15개의 행위항목을 선정하였다. 그리고 SD법에 의한 주관평가실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 공간의 특성이 달라도 조명환경의 분위기평가는 <활동성>, <안정감>, <고급감>의 3인자로 설명이 가능한 것으로 나타났다. 행위 인자에 있어서는 주거공간의 경우 <작업행위>,<휴식행위>,<오락행위>의 3인자가 추출되었고, 사무공간의 경우 <작업행위>, <비작업행위>의 2인자가 추출되었다. 주거공간에서의 3가지 행위인자를 설명하는데 있어서 가장 커다란 영향을 미치는 분위기인자는 <활동성>인자로 나타났으며, 사무공간의 경우, <작업행위>는 <활동성>인자가, <비작업행위>는 <고급감>인자가 가장 큰 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Y. Lee, S. J. Kim, “A Study on the Psychological Effect of Housing Lighting”, J. Archit. Plann. Environ. Eng. AIK, Vol.17, No.9, pp.297-284, 2001.
  2. H. J. Lee, S. P. Han, J. S. Lee, “Analyzing the Color Shift and the Psychological Reaction on the Physical Characteristics of the Light Source ”, Proceeding of AIK, pp.841-846, 1999.10.
  3. E. Ishibashi, T. Yatogo, K. Nomura, “Diversity of a Mental Process on yhe Lighting Effects for Elderly Persons”, J. Archit. Plann. Environ. Eng., AIJ, No.514, pp.119-124, 1998.
  4. N.Hajimu,K.Yoshinoriand S.Mayumi, “Systematization of Psychological and Physical Lighting Factors by Subjective Appraisal of the Lighted Environment in the Residential Living Room”, J. Illum. Engng. Inst. Jpn. Vol.80 No.11, pp.11-18, 1996.
  5. M. Yasuhiro et al., “A Study on the Variation of Interior Atomosphere as Affected by Light Distribution”, Proceeding of AIJ ,pp.961-962,1993.
  6. R. Hirose et al., “Psychological Effects of Lighting in a Living Room”, Proceeding of AIJ, pp.85-88, 1991.
  7. S. Y. Lee et al., “Effects of Brightness Distribution on Psychological Appraisal in a Living Room”, J. Archit. Plann. Environ. Eng., AIJ, No.497, pp.1-6, 1997.
  8. A. R. Bean, A. G. Hopkins, “Task and Background Lighting”, Lighting Research & Technology, Vol.12, pp.135-139, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032718001200303
  9. J. b. Collins, C. G. H. Plant, “Preferred Luminance distribution in Windowless Spaces ”, Lighting Research & Technology, Vol.3, pp.219-231, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032717100300305
  10. J. e. Flynn, T. J. Spencer, O. Martyniuk, C. Hendrick, “Interim Study of Procedures for Investigating the Effect of Light on Impressions and Behavior”, J. of the IES, Vol.3, pp.87-94, 1973.
  11. C. A. Bernecker, R. G. Davis, M. p. Webster, and J. P. Webster, “Task Lighting in the Open Office”, J. of the Illuminating Engineering Society, pp.18-25, Winter 1993.
  12. N. Mochizuki et al., “Psychological Effects of Luminance Distribution in Behavior Setting”, Proceeding of AIJ, pp.317-318, 1992.
  13. M. Kenji et al., “Lighting Conditions for some Behaviors in Living Rooms”, Proceeding of AIJ, pp.1131-1132, 1993.
  14. A. Mochizuki, M. Ujigawa, K. Hirate, “The Relation Between Preferred Lighting and Behavior in Office”, J. Archit. Plann. Environ. Eng. AIJ No.479, pp.17-25, 1996.
  15. K. Shigeo et al., “Illuminance Level and Uniformity of Interior Ambient Lighting for Behaviors of Daily Life”, J. Archit. Plann. Environ. Eng. AIJ, No.481, pp.13-22, 1996.
  16. K. Michiko et al., “ Psychological Evaluation of Celling Light in Room Actions”, Proceeding of AIJ, pp.293-294, 1983.
  17. P. L. Butler, P. M. Biner, “Preferred Lighting Levels -Variability Among Setting, Behaviors and Individuals-”, ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, Vol.19, No.6, pp.695-721, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916587196003

Cited by

  1. Experimental Study on Living Room Lighting Environment for Residential Activities vol.27, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5207/JIEIE.2013.27.1.010
  2. Experimental Evaluation of the Lighting Environment for Main Activities of the Residents in Living Room vol.27, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5207/JIEIE.2013.27.9.006