USLE모형과 대체법을 이용한 밭농사의 토양유실 저감기능 계량화 평가

Evaluation on national environmental functionality of farming on soil loss using the USLE and replacement cost method

  • 현병근 (농진청 연구관리국) ;
  • 김무성 (경희대학교 한방재료가공학) ;
  • 엄기철 (농업과학기술원 농업환경부) ;
  • 강기경 (농업과학기술원 농업환경부) ;
  • 윤홍배 (농업과학기술원 농업환경부) ;
  • 서명철 (농업과학기술원 농업환경부) ;
  • 성기석 (농업과학기술원 농업환경부)
  • Hyun, Byung-Keun (Research Management Bureau, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Moo-Sung (Department of Oriental Medicinal Material and Processing, Kyung-Hee Univ.) ;
  • Eom, Ki-Cheol (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology) ;
  • Kang, Ki-Kyung (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology) ;
  • Yun, Hong-Bae (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology) ;
  • Seo, Myung-Cheol (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology) ;
  • Sung, Ki-Seog (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
  • 투고 : 2002.11.25
  • 심사 : 2002.12.05
  • 발행 : 2002.12.30

초록

밭농사에 다원적기능중의 하나로 알려져 있는 토양유실저감기능에 대하여 기존에 보고된 결과를 수정 보완하였으며, 그 얻은 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 우리나라 밭농사의 토양유실량을 USLE모형을 이용하여 계산하였으며, 각 인자별 값은 다음과 같다. 강우인자(R)값은 429.4, 토양침식성인자(K)값은 0.15, 지형인자(LS)값은 1.72, 작물인자(C)값은 0.275, 토양관리인자(P)값은 0.856이었다. 2. USLE모형에 의한 우리나라 밭농사의 토양유실량은 ha당 연간 26.1톤이었으나, 나지토양의 경우에는 ha당 연간 110.8톤으로서 밭농사에 의한 토양유실량은 나지에 비하여 23% 수준이었으며, 연간 밭농사는 나지토양에 비하여 84.7톤의 토양유실량 저감기능이 있었다. 이것을 밭면적전체로는 연간 62,650천톤에 해당되었다. 3. 밭농사에 의한 토양유실저감량을 객토단가로 환산할 경우 연간 4,974억원에 해당하였다. 4. 토양유실 세부모형중 LS값이 1.72로 매우 높았는데, 밭농사의 공익기능을 제고하기 위해서는 등고선, 대상재배 등 농경적인 접근과 계단전 등의 전환 등 농토목적인 접근방식이 필요하다고 생각된다.

Multifunctionality of agriculture has been an important international issue in terms of environmental benefits and public concerns. We calculated soil loss mass in national basis using the USLE, and attempted to evaluate its economical benefits by replacement cost method. Soil loss mass ranged from 1.4 to $18MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$ was fairly fitted to measured values for 13 cropping systems. In national basis, the factors in USLE were evaluated as: 429.4 for rainfall and runoff factor. R, 0.15 for soil erodibility factor, K, 1.72 for topographic factor, LS, 0.275 for cover and management factor, C, and 0.856 for support practice factor, P. The soil loss estimated from upland farming using the USLE was $26.1MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, but soil loss from the bare soil was $110.8MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, the ratio of soil loss from upland farming to bare soil was 23 percents. Function of reducing soil loss in comparison with the bare soil was $84.7MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, of which national soil loss mass was 62.6 million MT per annum in south Korea. Agriculture economic replacement cost of soil loss reduction was 497 billion Wons(398 million dollars) for the cost of upland soil dressing. For conservational purposes to increase the environmental benefits of upland farming, the agricultural practice including contour, strip cropping, terracing and division ditches should be implemented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agriculture Science Institute(ASI). 1986. Upland Soil of Korea. pp562
  2. Canada. 2002. http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/engineer/facts/00-OOl .htm
  3. Cho K. K., and S. W. Park. 1981. Soil erosion on upland slopes-mainly on topographic factor. The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 23(2): 54-60
  4. Eom K. C., K. Y. Jung., S. E. Lee., B. H. Song., D. R. Choi., and S. H. Choi. 1996. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Upland Crop Cultivation on the Conservation of Natural Environments. Annual Report of agricultural special project(fina1 paper). Rural Development Administration (RDA). pp109
  5. Jung, B. G., K. B. Jung., B. M. Lee., and J. H. Kim.1999. Annual Report of the Monitoring Project on Agro-Environmental Quality. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology(NIAST). p13
  6. Jung, P. K. 1984. Rainfall Factor and Its Relationship to Soil Loss. The Sino-Korea bilateral symposium on soil and water conservation of sloped farm land. June 5-6, p43-58
  7. Jung. P. K., and M. H. Koh. 1981. Analysis of Rainfall pattern. Annual Report of Agriculture Science Institute(ASI). ASI. 312-333
  8. Jung, P. K., M. H. Koh., and K. T. Um. 1985.Discussion of Cropping Management factor for Estimating Soil Loss. Joural of Kordan Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer. 18(1):7-13
  9. Kentaro Yoshida. 1998. An Economic Evaluation of Multifuctional Roles of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. National Research Institute of Agricultural Economic (NRIAE). Annual Report of NRIAE 52(4): 113-138
  10. Korea Forest Service(KFS). 2000. Forest and Forestry Technique( 1 . General Forest). p35-53
  11. Ministry of Agriculture and Forest(MAF). 2001a. The propelling organization of Direct Payment in Less Favored Area. http://www.maf.go.kr/html/mains/depart.asp
  12. Ministry of Agriculture and Forest(MAF). 2001b. Agricultural and Forestry Statistical Yearbook. MAF.pp320
  13. Oh, S. I., S. S. Kim., and C. Y. Kang, 2001. Valuation of Multifunctionality of Agriculture (final report).Korea Rural Economic Instiute(KREI). pp86
  14. Oh, S. J., M. H. Um.. and, P. K, Jung. 1990. Analysis of soil loss amount according to plastic film mulching.Annual Report of Agriculture Science Institute(ASI) ASI. p158-163
  15. Oh, S. J., S. K. Kim.. Y. K, Son., K. H. Jung., and M H. Koh. 2002. Model development for easily estimating soil loss amount in arable lanc(Application of farming method materials. In pressing. Rural Development Administraon(RDA)
  16. Um, K, T., K. C. Eom., K. H. Yun., D. C. Noh.. Y. H. Kim., and H. S. Lee. 1992. General Descnoption of Korea Soi1s.(Soi1 Survey Materials No. 13). National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology(NIAST). p511
  17. Wischmeier, W. H., and D. D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses- a guide to conservation planning. U.S. Department of Agriculture.Agriculture Handbook NO. 537. pp58
  18. WTO homepage. 2001. http://www-heva.wto-ministeria1.org/eng1ish/thewto_e/minist_e/minOl_e/mindecl_e.htm