A STUDY ON THE TEMPERATURE CHANGES OF BONE TISSUES DURING IMPLANT SITE PREPARATION

임플랜트 식립부위 형성시 골조직의 온도변화에 관한 연구

  • Kim Pyung-Il (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jang Kyung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 김평일 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김영수 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 장경수 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김창회 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2002.02.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the possibility of thermal injury to bone tissues during an implant site preparation under the same condition as a typical clinical practice of $Br{\aa}nemark$ implant system. All the burs for $Br{\aa}nemark$ implant system were studied except the round bur The experiments involved 880 drilling cases : 50 cases for each of the 5 steps of NP, 5 steps of RP, and 7 steps of WP, all including srew tap, and 30 cases of 2mm twist drill. For precision drilling, a precision handpiece restraining system was developed (Eungyong Machinery Co., Korea). The system kept the drill parallel to the drilling path and allowed horizontal adjustment of the drill with as little as $1{\mu}m$ increment. The thermocouple insertion hole. that is 0.9mm in diameter and 8mm in depth, was prepared 0.2mm away from the tapping bur the last drilling step. The temperatures due to countersink, pilot drill, and other drills were measured at the surface of the bone, at the depths of 4mm and 8mm respectively. Countersink drilling temperature was measured by attaching the tip of a thermocouple at the rim of the countersink. To assure temperature measurement at the desired depths, 'bent-thermocouples' with their tips of 4 and 8mm bent at $120^{\circ}$ were used. The profiles of temperature variation were recorded continuously at one second interval using a thermometer with memory function (Fluke Co. U.S.A.) and 0.7mm thermocouples (Omega Co., U.S.A.). To simulate typical clinical conditions, 35mm square samples of bovine scapular bone were utilized. The samples were approximately 20mm thick with the cortical thickness on the drilling side ranging from 1 to 2mm. A sample was placed in a container of saline solution so that its lower half is submerged into the solution and the upper half exposed to the room air, which averaged $24.9^{\circ}C$. The temperature of the saline solution was maintained at $36.5^{\circ}C$ using an electric heater (J. O Tech Co., Korea). This experimental condition was similar to that of a patient s opened mouth. The study revealed that a 2mm twist drill required greatest attention. As a guide drill, a twist drill is required to bore through a 'virgin bone,' rather than merely enlarging an already drilled hole as is the case with other drills. This typically generates greater amount of heat. Furthermore, one tends to apply a greater pressure to overcome drilling difficulty, thus producing even greater amount heat. 150 experiments were conducted for 2mm twist drill. For 140 cases, drill pressure of 750g was sufficient, and 10 cases required additional 500 or 100g of drilling pressure. In case of the former. 3 of the 140 cases produced the temperature greater than $47^{\circ}C$, the threshold temperature of degeneration of bone tissue (1983. Eriksson et al.) which is also the reference temperature in this study. In each of the 10 cases requiring extra pressure, the temperature exceeded the reference temperature. More significantly, a surge of heat was observed in each of these cases This observations led to addtional 20 drilling experiments on dense bones. For 10 of these cases, the pressure of 1,250g was applied. For the other 10, 1.750g were applied. In each of these cases, it was also observed that the temperature rose abruptly far above the thresh old temperature of $47^{\circ}C$, sometimes even to 70 or $80^{\circ}C$. It was also observed that the increased drilling pressure influenced the shortening of drilling time more than the rise of drilling temperature. This suggests the desirability of clinically reconsidering application of extra pressures to prevent possible injury to bone tissues. An analysis of these two extra pressure groups of 1,250g and 1,750g revealed that the t-statistics for reduced amount of drilling time due to extra pressure and increased peak temperature due to the same were 10.80 and 2.08 respectively suggesting that drilling time was more influenced than temperature. All the subsequent drillings after the drilling with a 2mm twist drill did not produce excessive heat, i.e. the heat generation is at the same or below the body temperature level. Some of screw tap, pilot, and countersink showed negative correlation coefficients between the generated heat and the drilling time. indicating the more the drilling time, the lower the temperature. The study also revealed that the drilling time was increased as a function of frequency of the use of the drill. Under the drilling pressure of 750g, it was revealed that the drilling time for an old twist drill that has already drilled 40 times was 4.5 times longer than a new drill The measurement was taken for the first 10 drillings of a new drill and 10 drillings of an old drill that has already been used for 40 drillings. 'Test Statistics' of small samples t-test was 3.49, confirming that the used twist drills require longer drilling time than new ones. On the other hand, it was revealed that there was no significant difference in drilling temperature between the new drill and the old twist drill. Finally, the following conclusions were reached from this study : 1 Used drilling bur causes almost no change in drilling temperature but increase in drilling time through 50 drillings under the manufacturer-recommended cooling conditions and the drilling pressure of 750g. 2. The heat that is generated through drilling mattered only in the case of 2mm twist drills, the first drill to be used in bone drilling process for all the other drills there is no significant problem. 3. If the drilling pressure is increased when a 2mm twist drill reaches a dense bone, the temperature rises abruptly even under the manufacturer-recommended cooling conditions. 4. Drilling heat was the highest at the final moment of the drilling process.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T. Branemark PI. Hansson HA, Lindstro J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. : Requirements for ensuring a long lasting, direct bone ankorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52:155-170
  2. Lee JG, Yang JH. Lee SH. A study on the effect of rotational speeds of the trephine mill on the temperature of surrounding bone during dental implantation procedure and osseointegration of implants. J Kor Academy of Pros 1992:30:167-190
  3. Moon ES, Lim HS, Cho IH. A study on the heat generation of bone drilling burs according to irrigation during implantation of dental implant. J Kor Academy of Pros 1999:37:433-453
  4. Hwang HW, Lee SC, Kim YG, Ryu DM, Lee BS, Clinical study of dental implant: requirements for successful osseointegration. KAID 1999:18:1-9
  5. Eriksson A. Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury : A vital microscopic study in rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:101-107
  6. Watanabe F, Tawade Y, Komatus S, Hata Y. Heat distribution in bone during preparation of implant sites: heat annalysis by real-time thermography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992:7:212-219
  7. Brisman DL. The effect of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996:11:35-37
  8. Yacker M, Klein M.: The effect of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants., 1996:11: 634-638
  9. Eriksson R, Adell. Temperature during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxllofac Surg 1986:44:4-7
  10. Sutter F, Krekeler G, Schwammerger AW, Sutter FJ. Atraumatic surgical technique and implant bed preperation. Quintessence Int 1992:23:811-816
  11. Krause WR, Bredbury DW, Kelly JE, Lunceford EM. Temperature elevation in orthopedic cutting operations. J Biomech Eng 1982: 15: 267-275
  12. Bachus KN, Rondina MT, Hutchinson DT. The effects of drilling force on cortical temperatures and their duration: an vitro study. Medical Engineering & Physics 2000:22: 685-691
  13. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z. Heat generation during implant site preparation. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997:12:186-193
  14. Benington IC, Biagioni PA. Crossey PJ. Hussey DL, Sheridan S, Lamey PJ. Temperature changes in bovin mandibular bone during implant site preparation: an assessment using infra-red thermography. J Dent 1996:24:263-267
  15. Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part 1 : Relatationship between drill speed and heat production. Int J Prosthodont 1997:10:411-414
  16. Kerawala CJ, Martin IC, Allan W, Williams ED. The effects of operature technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999:88:145-150
  17. Moritz AR, Henriques FC Jr. Studies of thermal injury. Am J Path 1947;23:695-720
  18. Sevitt S. Pathological sequelae of burns. Proc R Soc Med 1954:47:225-228
  19. Mathews LS. Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg 1972:54:297-308
  20. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986: 1: 11-25
  21. Abouzgia MB, James DF. Temperature rise during drilling through bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997:12:342-353
  22. Wachter R, Stroll P. Increase ot temperature during osteotomy. In vitro and in vivo investgations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991:20:245-249