Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국수산과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Compensatory Growth in Juvenile Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in the Spring

  • Cho Sung Hwoan (Uljin Marine Hatchery, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lee Jong Kwan (Uljin Marine Hatchery, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute)
  • Published : 2002.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A feeding trial was conducted to determine compensatory growth of juvenile olive flounder in the spring. Five treatments of fish with 3 replicates were prepared: the control group fish (C) fed twice daily for 8 weeks, the Sl, S2, S3 and S4 fish fed for 7, 6, 5 and 4 weeks after 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of starvation, respectively. Survival of olive flounder was not significantly different among treatments. Weight gain of flounder in S2 was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that of fish in S3 or S4, but not significantly different from that of fish in C or Sl. The poorest weight gain was observed in fish of S4 treatment. Specific growth rate (SGR) for flounder in S2 was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that for fish in C or S4, but not significantly different from that of fish in Sl or S3. Feed intake (g/fish) was proportional to duration of days of feeding except for flounder in S2, but not significantly different among C, Sl or S2. Feed efficiency ratio (FER) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) for flounder in S2 were significantly (P<0.05) higher than for fish in C, but not significantly different from those for fish in Sl, S3 or S4. Hepatosomatic index (HSI) and condition factor (CF) for flounder in Sl, S3 and S4 were not significantly different from those for fish in C, but significantly (P<0.05) lower than S2 except for CF in Sl at the end of the experiment. Proximate composition of the whole body of flounder was not significantly different among treatments. In considering results of the experiment, juvenile olive flounder achieved compensatory growth when properly fed after starved up to 2 weeks in the spring. Compensatory growth of fish was supported by improvement in SGR, FER and PER in fish starved.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia. 1298pp
  2. Bilton, H.T. and G.L. Robins. 1973. The effects of starvation and subsequent feeding on survival and growth of fulton channel sockeye salmon fry. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 30, 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1139/f73-001
  3. Damsgaard, B. and L.M. Dill. 1998. Risk-taking behavior in weight-compensating coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Behav. Ecol., 9, 26-32 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/9.1.26
  4. Dobson, S.H. and R.M. Holmes. 1984. Compensatory growth in the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J. Fish Biol., 25, 649-656 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1984.tb04911.x
  5. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  6. Gaylord, T.G. and D.M. Gatlin. 2000. Assessment of compensatory growth in channel catfish Ictalums punctatus R. and associated changes in body condition indices. J. World Aqua. Soc., 31, 326-336 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00884.x
  7. Gaylord, T.G. and D.M. Gatlin. 2001. Dietary protein and energy modifications to maximize compensatory growth of channel catfish (Ictalums punctatus). Aquaculture 194, 337-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00523-8
  8. Graynoth, E. and M.J. Taylor. 2000. Influence of different ratios and water temperatures on the growth rates of shortfinned eels and longfinned eels. J. Fish Biol., 57, 681-699 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00268.x
  9. Jobling, M., O.H. Meloy, J. Dos Santos and B. Christiansen. 1994. The compensatory growth response of the Atlantic cod: effects of nutritional history. Aquac. Int., 2, 75-90 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128802
  10. Jobling, M. and J. Koskela. 1996. Interindividual variations in feeding and growth in rainbow trout during restricted feeding and in a subsequent period of compensatory growth. J. Fish BioL, 49, 658-667 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00062.x
  11. Lee, S.M., C.H. Seo and Y.S. Cho. 1999. Growth of the juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) fed the diets at different feeding frequencies. J. Korean Fish. Soc., 32, 18-21
  12. Lee, S.M., S.H. Cho and K.D. Kim. 2000a. Effects of dietary protein and energy levels on growth and body composition of juvenile flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). J. World Aqua. Soc., 31, 306-315 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00882.x
  13. Lee, S.M., S.H. Cho and D. Kim. 2000b. Effects of feeding frequency and dietary energy level on growth and body composition of juvenile olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aqua. Res., 12, 917-923
  14. Miglavs, I. and M. Jobling. 1989. Effects of feeding regime on food consumption, growth rates and tissue nucleic acids in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, with particular respect to compensatory growth. J. Fish Biol., 34, 947-957 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03377.x
  15. Paul, A.J., J.M. Paul and R.L. Smith. 1995. Compensatory growth in Alaska yellowfin sole, Pleuronectes asper, following food deprivation. J. Fish Biol., 46, 442-448 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb05984.x
  16. Qian, X., Y. Cui, B. Xiong and Y. Yang. 2000. Compensatorygrowth, feed utilization and activity in gibel carp, following feed deprivation. J. Fish Biol., 56, 228-232 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02101.x
  17. Quinton, J.C. and R.W. Blake. 1990. The effect of feed cyclingand ration level on the compensatory growth response in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J. Fish Biol., 37, 33-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05924.x
  18. Rueda, F.M., F.J. Martinez, S. Zamora, M. Kentouri and P. Divanach. 1998. Effect of fasting and refeeding on growth and body composition of red porgy, Pagrus pagrus L. Aqua. Res., 29, 447-452
  19. Schwarz, FJ., J. Plank and M. Kirchgessner. 1985. Effects ofprotein or energy restriction with subsequent realimentation on performance parameters of carp (Cypnnus carpio L.). Aquaculture 48, 23-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(85)90049-3
  20. Saether, B.S. and M. Jobling. 1999. The effects of ration level on feed intake and growth, and compensatory growth after restricted feeding, in turbot Scophthalmus maximus L. Aqua. Res., 30, 647-653 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.1999.00368.x
  21. Wang, Y., Y. Cui, Y. Yang and F. Cai. 2000. Compensatory growth in hybrid tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus X O. niloticus, reared in seawater. Aquaculture, 189, 101-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00353-7
  22. Xie, S., X. Xhu, Y. Cui, R.J. Wootton, W. Lei and Y. Yang. 2001. Compensatory growth n the gibel carp following feed deprivation: temporal patterns in growth, nutrient deposition, feed intake and body composition. J. Fish BioL, 8, 999-1009
  23. Zhu, X., Y. Cui, M. Ali and R.J. Wootton. 2001. Comparison of compensatory growth responses of juvenile threespined stickleback and minnow following similar food deprivation protoeols. J. Fish Biol., 58, 1149-1165 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00562.x

Cited by

  1. The Effects of Different Feeding Strategies on the Growth of Young Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., in a Freshwater Recirculating System during Summer vol.8, pp.1, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5657/fas.2005.8.1.038
  2. Effects of Alternate-Week Feeding Strategies on Growth and Feed Efficiency Ratio of Juvenile Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in a Recirculating System vol.8, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5657/fas.2005.8.3.128
  3. 넙치 Paralichthys olivaceus 치어의 성장과 생존에 미치는 반복적 절식의 영향 vol.41, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2008.41.2.125