DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reinforced concrete beam-column joints with lap splices under cyclic loading

  • Karabinis, Athanasios I. (Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace)
  • Received : 2000.10.02
  • Accepted : 2002.10.02
  • Published : 2002.12.25

Abstract

Experimental results are presented from tests conducted on reinforced concrete beam-column joints with lap splices under reversed cyclic loading simulating earthquake action. Response curves are compared for twenty-four specimens designed according to Eurocode 2. The main parameters of the investigation are, the geometry of the reinforcing bar extension, the applied axial load (normalized), the available cover over lap splice region extended as length required from Eurocode 2, as well as the shape and the volumetric percentage of the stirrups confining the lap splice zone. The results are evaluated with regards to the load intensity, the energy absorption capacity and the characteristics of the load deflection curve.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 318, "Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-95)", American Concrete Institute, Detroit 1995.
  2. Canadian Standards Association. "Code for the design of concrete structures for buildings" (CAN3-A23.3M-84),Rexdale, 1984.
  3. 'EC2 - Eurocode 2 - Design of Concrete Structures Part 1-1/1992', ENV 1992.
  4. 'EC-8 - Eurocode 8 - Regulations for Design of Structures under Seismic Actions, Part 1-3, General Codes -Specific Codes for Various Construction Materials and Elements', ENV 1998-1-3-1994.
  5. Karabinis, A. (1994), "Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of the lap splices", Proc. 11thGreek Concrete Conf., Vol. II, May, 50-68 (in Greek).
  6. Karabinis, A. (1995), "Influence of shear on reinforced concrete beams with lap splices", 2nd East Asia-PacificConf. on Structural Engineering and Construction, Vol. 1, Goald Coast, Australia, July, 597-602.
  7. Lukose, K., Gergely, P. and White, R. (1982), "Behavior of reinforced concrete lapped splices for inelastic cyclicloading", ACI Struct. J., 79(5), March-April 1982, 355-365.
  8. Panahshahi, N., White, R. and Gergely, P. (1992), "Reinforced concrete compression lap splices under inelasticcyclic loading", ACI Struct. J., 89(2), March-April 1992, 164-175.
  9. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), "Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings", J.Willey.
  10. Paulay, T. (1982), "Lapped splices in earthquake resisting columns", ACI J., Nov. - Dec. 1982, 458-469.
  11. Rezansoff, T., Zacaruk, J. and Topping, R., (1988), "Tensile lap splices in reinforced concrete beams underinelastic cyclic loading", ACI Struct. J., January - February 1988, 46-52.
  12. Sagan, V.E., Gergely, P. and White, R.N. (1991), "Behavior and design of non contact lap splices subjected torepeated inelastic tensile loading", ACI Struct. J., 88(4), July-August 1991, 420-431.

Cited by

  1. Experimental investigation on joints between steel-reinforced concrete T-shaped column and reinforced concrete beam under bidirectional low-cyclic reversed loading vol.20, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216653841
  2. Structural performance of steel-truss-reinforced composite joints under cyclic loading vol.171, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.16.00188
  3. Investigation of interface response of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with composites vol.22, pp.6, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.6.1337
  4. Cyclic performance of RC beam-column joints with mechanical or forging (GPW) splices; an experimental study vol.28, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.071
  5. Seismic Performances of SRC Special-Shaped Columns and RC Beam Joints Under Double-Direction Low-Cyclic Reversed Loading vol.8, pp.None, 2002, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.761376
  6. An experimental comparison of RC beam-column joints incorporating different splice methods in the beam vol.34, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.101