DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-breed Genetic Evaluation for Swine in Korea

국내 종돈의 다품종 유전능력 평가

  • Do, C.H. (Korea Animal Improvement Association) ;
  • Park, H.Y. (Konkuk University Department of Animal Science) ;
  • Hyun, J.Y. (Korea Animal Improvement Association)
  • Published : 2002.08.31

Abstract

This study was carried out for the simultaneous genetic evaluation of swine breeds from the seedstock farms in Korea. The performance tested production records of 96,842 heads and the litter records of 90,396 litters from 1995 to 2001 were analyzed to estimate the breeding values and the breed effects of days to 90kg, daily gain, back fat thickness, loin muscle area, lean meat percent, total litter size and number born alive from Landrace, Yorkshire and Duroc. Estimated breed effects of traits had shown the characteristics of the breeds. Landrace was superior in back fat thickness and lean meat percent to other breeds. Yorkshire had shown good performance in lean meat percent, loin muscle area, total litter size and number born alive. Duroc was superior to the other breeds in days to 90kg and daily gain. Conclusively, the multi-breed genetic evaluation would result in higher connectedness and provide convenience for the routine genetic evaluation process of swine performance and reproduction test.

본 연구는 1995년부터 2001년까지 한국종축개량협회가 전국 종돈장으로부터 수집한 Land- race, Yorkshire 및 Duroc의 등지방 두께, 일당증체량, 90kg 도달일령, 등심단면적, 정육률, 총산자수 및 복당생존자돈수에 대해 유전적 그룹을 통한 품종효과의 추정과 유전능력 평가를 위하여 96,842두의 산육능력성적과 90,396복의 산자능력자료를 분석하였다. 추정된 품종효과들은 각 품종의 특징을 보여주는데 Landrace는 등지방, 정육률 및 총산자수에서 우수하였고, Yorkshire는 정육률, 등심단면적, 총산자수 및 복당생존자돈수에서 좋은 결과를 보여주었으며, Duroc은 90kg 도달일령과 일당증체량에서는 우수하였지만 가식부위를 결정하는 등지방두께와 정육률, 번시능력을 보여주는 산자수에서 다른 품종에 뒤지는 것으로 나타났다. 유전적 그룹을 통한 품종효과의 추정으로 품종별로 능력평가를 하는 노력을 절감할 수 있고 또한 F1 잡종돈이 포함되어도 평가할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Elzo, M. A. 1990. Covariances among sire by breed group of dam interaction effects in multibreed sire evaluation procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 68:4079-4099. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68124079x
  2. Henderson C. R. 1988. Theoretical basis and computational methods for a number of different animal models. J. Dairy Sci. 71(Suppl. 2):1.
  3. Martel, J., Minvielle, F. and Poste, L. M. 1988. Effects of crossbreeding and sex on carcass composition cooking properties and sensory characteristics of pork. J. Anim. Sci. 66:41-46. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.66141x
  4. Quaas, R. L. 1988. Additive genetic model with groups and relationships. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1388.
  5. Roehe, R. and Kennedy, B. W. 1995. Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and Landrace swine with each parity of farrowing treated as a different trait. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2959-2970. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73102959x
  6. Schaeffer, L. R. 1983. Notes on linear model theory, best linear unbiased prediction, and variance components. Guelph University, Guelph, Canada.
  7. Wiggans, G. R., Misztal, I. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1988. Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 71(Suppl. 2):54.
  8. 종돈능력개량보고서(I). 2000. 한국종축개량협회.
  9. 최진성, 이정규. 2001. 농장검정돼지의 품종, 성 및 환경요인이 경제형질에 미치는 효과. 동물자원지 : 43(4):431-444.