Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제27권3호
  • /
  • Pages.249-256
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제 2급 와동에서 구치부 복합레진의 미세변연누출에 관한 연구

MICROLEAKAGE OF POSTERIOR PACKABLE COMPOSITE RESIN hi THE GINGIVAL MARGINS OF CLASS II CAVITIES

  • 최수진 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김미자 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 권혁춘 (서울대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Choi, Su-Jin (Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Ja (Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuk-Choon (Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2002.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The use of flowable composite resins as liners in class II packable composite restoration has been suggested by some manufacturers. However, the contributions of this technique are unproven. The purpose of this study was to compare the gingival microleakage in class II packable composite restorations with or without the use of flowable composite resins as liners. Slot cavities were prepared on both proximals of 80 extracted human molars and randomly assigned to 8 groups of 20 each. The gingival margins were located at 1mm above CEJ in 80 cavities (group1-4) and 1mm below CEJ in 80 cavities (group5-8). The prepared teeth were mounted in the customized tray with adjacent teeth to simulate clinical conditions and metallic matrix band (Sectional matrix) and wooden wedges were applied. After acid etching and application of Single Bond, each group was restored with the following materials using incremental placement technique: Group 1,5 (Filtek P60), group 2, 3, 4 and group 6, 7, 8 (AeliteFlo, TetricFlow, Revolution/ Filtek P60). All specimens were thermocycled 500 times between 5$^{\circ}C$ and 55$^{\circ}C$ with 1 mimute dwell time, immersed 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and then rinsed with tab water. The specimens were embedded in clear resin and sectioned longitudinally through the center of restoration with a low speed diamond saw. Dye penetration at gingival margin was viewed at 20 magnification and analyzed on a scale of 0 to 4. Kruscal-Wallis One way analysis and Mann-Whitney Rank sum test were used to analyze the results. The results of this study were as follows. 1. The leakage values seen at the enamel margin were significantly lower than those seen at the dentin margin(P<0.05). 2. On the enamel margin, packable composite resins with flowable liners showed lower leakage than those without flowable liners, but there were no significant differences among the four groups(P>0.05). 3. On the dentin margin, four groups demonstrated moderate to severe leakage, and there were no significant differences in leakage values(P>0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartx ML & Mccune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Three-year report. J of Prosthet Dent 1973:30(6) :891-897 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90283-7
  2. Belvedere P. Posterior composites experiencing growth trend Dentistry Today 1999: 18(3) :44.46-47
  3. Leinfelder KF. Radz GM & Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 1998: 19(3):230-237
  4. Alster D. FeiIzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Mol A, Davidson CL. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992: 71: 1619-1621 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710091401
  5. Ehrnflrd L. Derand T. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restoration. Swed Dent J 1984:8:15-19
  6. Qvist V. Resin resorations: Leakage. bacteria, pulp. Endod Dent TraumatIo 1993:9: 127-152 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1993.tb00265.x
  7. Tjan AH. Bergh BH. Lindner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992 :67 :62-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90051-B
  8. Lutz E, Krejci I. Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margin of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986:17: 777-784
  9. Fusayama T. Indications for self-cured and light cured adhesive composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 67:46-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90048-F
  10. Crim GA, Champman KW. Reducing microleakage in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994:25:781-785
  11. A. Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996:21: 67-70
  12. Bayne se, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr. Stamatiades P. Wilkersin M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998: 129:567-577 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  13. Bonner PB. New developments in composite resins. Dentistry Today 1997: 16(4) :44-47
  14. Leevailoj c. Cochran MA, Matis BA. Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001 :26(3) :302-307
  15. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao ce, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite resorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001: 85(2): 177-183 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113780
  16. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of class II adhesive composite restoration. Oper Dent 2001 :26(1) :70-75
  17. Ashraf M. Estafan. Denise Estafan. Microleakage study of fl owa ble composite resin systems. Compendium 2000: vol.21. No.9:705-712
  18. John H. Payne IV. The marginal seal of class II resoration: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J of Clin Pediat Dent 1999: voI.23, No.2: 123-130
  19. Kemp-Scholte CM. Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990:69(6): 1240-1243 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  20. R. Labella. P. Lambrechts. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15(1999)128-137 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
  21. Kays BT, Sneed WD. Muckles DB. lvIicrohardness of class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions. J Prosth Dent 1991: 65(4) :487-490 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90285-5
  22. Leeson TS: Atlas of Histology 1 ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 401.1988
  23. Davidson CL. de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984:63(2): 146-148
  24. Versluis A. Tantbirojn D. Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998: 77:1435-1445 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060801
  25. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997:105:92-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00186.x
  26. Kanca J. Suh BI. Pulse activation: Reducing resinbased composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999: 12: 107-112
  27. Feilzer A. de Gee A. Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. J Dent Res 1987:66: 1636-1639 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  28. C Beznos. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 :26:60-69
  29. Van Meerbeek B. Willems G. Celis JP. Roos JH. Braem M. Lambrechts P. Banherle G. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resindentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993:72:1434-1442 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401

피인용 문헌

  1. Self-adhesion of low-viscosity composites to dentin surface vol.28, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.3.209