DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computational Processing of Korean Dialogue and the Construction of Its Representation Structure Based on Situational Information

상황정보에 기반한 한국어대화의 전산적 처리와 표상구조의 구축

  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

In Korean dialogue honorification phenomenon may occur, an honorific pronoun may be used, and a subject or an object may be completely omitted when it can be recovered based on context. This paper proposes that in order to process Korean dialogue in which such distinct linguistic phenomena occur and to construct its representation structure we mark and use the following information explicitly, not implicitly : information about dialogue participants, information about the speech act of an utterance, information about the relative order of social status for the people involved in dialogue, and information flow among utterances of dialogue. In addition, this paper presents a method of marking and using such situational information and an appropriate representation structure of Korean dialogue. In this paper we set up Korean dialogue representation structure by modifying and extending DRT (Discourse Representation Theory) and SDRT (Segmented Discourse Representation Theory). Futhermore, this paper shows how to process Korean dialogue computationally and construct its representation structure by using Prolog programming language, and then applies such representation structure to spontaneous Korean dialogue to know its validity.

한국어대화에서는 존대현상(honorification phenomenon)이 일어나기도 하고, 존대대명사(honorific pronoun)가 사용되기도 하며, 맥락상 되찾을 수 있으면 주어나 목적어가 완전히 생략되기도 한다. 이러한 특징적인 언어현상이 일어나는 한국어대화를 처리하고 그것의 표상구조를 만들기 위해서 대화참석자에 관한 정보, 발화문의 화행에 관한 정보. 대화에 관련된 사람들의 사회적 지위에 있어서의 상대적 순위에 관한 정보, 대화에 나타나는 발화문 사이의 정보흐름 등을 묵시적으로가 아니라 명시적으로 표시하고 이용할 것을 본 논문은 제안한다. 또한. 본 논문은 이러한 상황정보(situational information)를 표시하고 이용하는 방법과 한국어대화의 적절한 표상구조를 제시한다. 본 논문에서 한국어대화표상구조의 설정은 담화표상이론(Discourse Representation Theory)과 분할담화표상이론(Segmented Discourse Representation Theory)을 수정ㆍ확대하여 이루어진다. 나아가서, 본 논문은 한국어대화를 전산적으로 어떻게 처리하고 그것의 표상구조를 구축하는지를 프롤로그 프로그래밍 언어를 사용하여 보여주고 나서, 그러한 표상구조의 타당성을 알아보기 위해 자연발생적 한국어대화에도 적용시켜 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hans Kamp, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation,' In Ieroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof, editors, Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, , pp.277-322, 1981
  2. Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle, From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993
  3. Nicholas Asher, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993
  4. Hae-Yun Lee, 'Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung in der Diskursreprasentationstheorie : Analysen der Frage- Antwort-Paare,' Koreanische Zeitschrift fur Germanistik, Vol.40, No.4, pp.160-179, 1999
  5. 정소우, '담화표상이론에서의 접근가능성에 대하여', 담화와 인지, 제2권, 1996
  6. Alex Lascarides and Nicholas Asher, 'Discourse Relations and Defeasible Knowledge,' In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting d the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-91). Berkeley, pp.55-63, 1991
  7. Alex Lascarides, Nicholas Asher, and Jon Oberlander, 'Inferring Discourse Relations in Context,' In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-92), Newark, pp.1-8, 1992
  8. Edward Finegan, Language: Its Structure and Use, Third Edition, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York, 1999
  9. Stephen C. Levinson, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983
  10. John R. Searle, Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1969
  11. John R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979
  12. Massimo Poesio, 'A Model of Conversation Processing Based on Micro Conversational Events,' In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Pittsburgh, 1995
  13. Massimo Poesio and David Traum, 'A Multi-Purpose Model of Conversational Context,' In Proceedings of the IJC AI Workshop on Context and Knowledge Representation, Montreal, 1995
  14. 김석득, '한국어 존대형의 확대구조', 인문과학, 제20권, 1968
  15. 고영근, '현대 국어의 존대법에 대한 연구', 어학연구, 제10권 제2호, 1974
  16. 김형규, '국어 경어법 연구', 동양학, 제5권, 1975
  17. 황적륜, '한국어 대우법의 사회 언어학적 기술', 언어와 언어학, 제4권, 1976
  18. 서정수, 존대법의 연구, 한신문화사, 서울, 1984
  19. Susumo Kuno and Young-Joo Kim, 'The Honorific Forms of Compound Verbals in Korean,' In Susumo Kuno, John Whitman, Ik-Hwan Lee, and Young-Se Kang, editors, Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, pp.178-189, Hanshin Publishing Company, Seoul. 1985
  20. Ivan Bratko, Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, Third Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 2001
  21. William F. Clocksin and Christopher S. Mellish, Programming in Prolog, Third, Revised and Extended Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987
  22. Leon Sterling and Ehud Shapiro, The Art of Prolog, Second Edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994
  23. Bob Carpenter and Gerald Penn, ALE(Attribute Logic Engine), Version 2.01, http://macduff.andrew.cmu.edu/ale, 1995
  24. Mark Johnson, Attribute-Value Logic and the Theory of Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes Number 16, CSLI, Stanford, 1988
  25. Stuart M. Shieber, An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes Number 4, CSLI, Stanford, 1986