DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Hot Water Extract Powder from Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Seed on Quality of Noodle

홍화씨 열수추출 분말 첨가가 국수의 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2002.06.01

Abstract

Quality of noodle processed by addition of hot water extract powder from roasted safflower seed (RSHE) was investigated. Proximate compositions of RSHE was 4.70% of moisture, 32.63% of crude Protein, 6.52% of crude fat, 15.62% of crude ash and 40.53% of carbohydrate. There was no significant difference (p<0.05) in hunter's color value between noodles with and without RSHE. The ‘L’vague of noodle processed by addition of powder from roasted safflower seed (RSP) was very low and significantly different (p<0.05) from other products. With the increase of RSHE addition, the volume and weight of cooked noodles increased (R$^2$=0.9688). The breaking force of dry noodle decreased with the increase of RSHE addition. In the mastication test of cooked noodles, max. weight, strength and hardness increased with the increase of RSHE addition. Dry noodle with 0.3% and 0.5% RSHE recorded high rank, but that with RSP recorded the lowest rank in score of appearance and color by sensory evaluation. The noodle processed with 0.3∼0.5% RSHE showed high sensory quality.

홍화씨 별수추출 분말을 첨가한 국수의 품질특성은 다음과 같다. 홍화씨 열수추출 분말의 첨가에 따른 건면의 색도는 무첨가구와 추출분말을 첨가한 구간의 유의적인 차이는 나타나지 않았으나, 무침가구와 홍화씨 분말첨가구간의 색차는 유의적 차이가 나타났고, 홍화씨 분말의 첨가로 인해 L값이 무첨가구에 비해 크게 낮아졌다. 조리면에서는 열수추출 분말의 첨가량이 증가할수록 무게와 부피가 높은 상관관계($R^2$=0.9688)를 나타내면서 증가하였다. 건면의 파쇄력은 홍화씨 열수추출 분말의 첨가량이 증가할수록 낮아졌고 0.5% 첨가구가 가장 낮았다. 조리면의 압착시험 결과는 열수추출 분말의 첨가량이 증가할수록 max. weight, strength 및 hardness가 증가하였다. 열수추출 분말을 첨가한 국수가 무첨가 국수보다 절단 강도가 높았다. 건면에 대한 관능검사 결과 중 외관은 열수추출 분말 0.3% 첨가구가 색은 열수추출 분말 0.3%와 0.5% 첨가구가 가장 높은 점수를 얻었다. 또한, 외관, 색, 냄새, 맛, 조직감 및 전반적 기호도에서 열수추출 분말 첨가국수와 무첨가 국수, 분말 첨가 국수간의 유의적 차이가 나타났다. 전반적인 기호도는 열수추출 분말 0.5% 첨가구가 가장 높은 점수를 얻었다.

Keywords

References

  1. The lipid research clinics program. 1984. The lipid research clinics coronary primary prevention trial results: II. the relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 251: 365-374 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.251.3.365
  2. Hotta M, Ogata K, Nitta A, Hosika K, Ynagi M, Yamazaki K. 1989. Useful plant of the world. Heibonsha Publishers, Japan. p 221
  3. Khan AR. 1929. Studies in indian oil seeds; Carthamus tinctorious L. the types of safflower. Dept Agri India Bot Ser 18: 81-87
  4. Roh JS, Sun WS, Oh SU, Lee JI, Oh WT, Kim JH. 1999. In vitro antioxidant activity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seeds. Food Sci Biotechnol 8: 88-92
  5. Seo HJ, Kim JH, Kwak DY, Jeon SM, Ku SK, Lee JH, Moon KD, Choi MS. 2000. The effects of safflower seed powder and its fraction on bone tissue in rib-fractured rats during the recovery. Kor J Nutr 33: 411-420
  6. Kim JH, Jeon SM, An MY, Ku SK, Lee JH, Choi MS, Moon KD. 1998. Effects of diet of Korean safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) seed powder on bone tissue in rats during the recovery of rib fracture. J Kor Soc Food Sci Nutr 27: 698-704
  7. Jeon SM, Kim JH, Lee HJ, Lee IK, Moon KD, Choi MS. 1998. The effects of Korean safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) seed powder supplementation diet on bone metabolism indices in rats during the recovery of rib fracture. Kor J Nutr 31: 1049-105
  8. Moon KD, Back SS, Kim JH, Jeon SM, Lee MK, Choi MS. 2001. Safflower seed extract lowers plasma and hepatic lipids in rats fed high-cholesterol. Nutr Res 21: 895-904 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(01)00293-7
  9. Zhang HL, Nagatsu A, Watanabe T, Sakakibara J, Okuyama H. 1997. Antioxidative compounds isolated from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) oil cake. Chem Pharm Bull 45: 1910-1914 https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.45.1910
  10. Kim JH, Choi MS, Moon KD. 2000. Quality characteristics of bread prepared with the addition of roasted safflower seed powder. Kor J Postharvest Sci Technol 7: 80-83
  11. Shin JY, Byun MW, Noh BS, Choi EH. 1991. Noodle characteristics of jerusalem artichoke added wheat flour and improving effect of texture modifying agents. Kor J Food Sci Technol 23: 538-545
  12. Lee JC, Hwang YH. 1996. Variation of asparagine and asphatic acid content in beabsprout soybeans. Kor J Crop Sci 41: 592-599
  13. Shin SY, Kim SK. 1993. Cooking properties of dry noodles prepared from HRW-WW and HRW-ASW wheat flour blends. Kor J Food Sci Technol 25: 232-237
  14. Kim SK, Kim HR, Bang JB. 1996. Effects of alkaline reagent on the rheological properties of wheat flour and noodle property. Kor J Food Sci Technol 28: 58-65
  15. Kim SS, Kim BY, Hahm YT, Shin DH. 1999. Least cost and optimum mixing programming by yulmu mixture noodle. Kor J Food Sci Technol 31: 385-390
  16. Kim YS. 1998. Effects of Poria coccus powder on wet noodle qualities. Agric Chem Biotech 41: 539-544
  17. Yunt SH, Quail K, Moss R. 1996. Physicochemical properties of australian wheat flours for white salted noodles. J Cereal Sci 23: 181-189 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0018

Cited by

  1. Quality Characteristics of Noodle Added with Dried Saururus chinensis Baill. Root Powder vol.40, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.12.1764
  2. Mass Production Process for Flour Noodles Containing Perilla Leaves and Their Antioxidant Effects vol.40, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.12.1688
  3. Quality Characteristics of Noodles Containing Shoots and Leaves of Aralia elata and Kalopanax pictus vol.41, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2012.41.4.571
  4. Quality Characteristics of Noodles Added with Freeze-Dried Fish Scale Collagen Mixture Powder vol.44, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.3.449
  5. Quality Characteristics of Noodle Added with Radish Juice Containing Pulp vol.32, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.5.559
  6. Improvement on the Antioxidant Activity of Instant Noodles Containing Enzymatic Extracts from Ecklonia cava and Its Quality Characterization vol.43, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2010.43.5.391
  7. 헛개나무 열매 분말을 첨가한 국수의 품질특성 vol.34, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.10.1586
  8. 구아검 및 바질검 첨가 Gluten-free 생면의 제조 및 품질 특성 비교 vol.23, pp.4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2017.23.4.012