The Journal of Internal Korean Medicine (대한한방내과학회지)

The Society of Internal Korean Medicine (대한한방내과학회)
권호 표지

The Trend of Submitted Manuscripts to the Journal of Korean Oriental Internal Medicine

대한한방내과학회지에 투고된 논문들의 경향성

  • Ko, Seong-Gyu (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Sangji University)
  • 고성규 (상지대학교 한의과대학 내과학교실)
  • Published : 2002.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : We analyzed the published and contributed manuscripts of the journal of Oriental Internal Medicine in 2001. Methods : We analysed 120 manuscripts contributed to the editorial board of Journal of Oriental Internal Medicine from January to December 2001. Each manuscript was reviewed by three judges, was reviewed by two editors of the board and who took notes on the coding sheet. The variables of surveying were yes or no of acceptance, total scores, score of each 9 item, the number of writers and institutes, and languages. Statistical methods were used such as descriptive analysis, independent samples t test, ANOVA, multiple composition, multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results : THe odds ratio in vivo, in vitro study for clinical study were 5.15(95% CI 1.93-13.71), and case series or case-control study for case report were 3.78(95% CI, 1.28-11.19) Conclusions : Although in vivo, the in vitro study had more possibility of acceptance to publish than the clinical study, we should identify that these results are assuming high inter-reviewer reliability.

Keywords

References

  1. J of Korean Oriental Internal Medicine v.22 no.2 Research Trends of Oriental Medicine in Korea and Qualitative Analysis of Articles related to Stroke in the Journal of Korean Oriental Medicine Ko, S.G.
  2. Korean J of Med v.47 A critical study of the comparative research articles of the Korea Journal of Medicinean attempt of quality assessment for quality improvement Hong, C.G.
  3. Ann Intern Med v.126 no.1 Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical Journals International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
  4. Med Care v.35 no.4 Peer review and the research commons: a problem of success Neuhauser, D.
  5. Ann Emerg Med v.12 Evaluating the medical literature Cuddy, P.G.;Elenbass, R.M.;Elenbass, J.K.
  6. JAMA v.272 no.2 Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal Rochen, P.A.;Gurwitz, J.H.;Cheung, C.M.;Hayes, J.A.;Chalmers, T.C.
  7. J of Korean Oriental Medicine v.20 no.1 Correlation Analysis with modified Barthel Index and Motor Assessment Scale in Stroke Patients Ko, S.G.;Jeon, C.Y.