Effect of Hydrogen Treatment on Electrical Properties of Hafnium Oxide for Gate Dielectric Application

  • Park, Kyu-Jeong (Department of Materials Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Woong-Chul (Department of Materials Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, Soon-Gil (Department of Materials Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2001.06.01

Abstract

Hafnium oxide thin films for gate dielectric were deposited at $300^{\circ}C$ on p-type Si (100) substrates by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and annealed in $O_2$ and $N_2$ ambient at various temperatures. The effect of hydrogen treatment in 4% $H_2$ at $350^{\circ}C$ for 30 min on the electrical properties of $HfO_2$for gate dielectric was investigated. The flat-band voltage shifts of $HfO_2$capacitors annealed in $O_2$ambient are larger than those in $N_2$ambient because samples annealed in high oxygen partial pressure produces the effective negative charges in films. The oxygen loss in $HfO_2$films was expected in forming gas annealed samples and decreased the excessive oxygen contents in films as-deposited and annealed in $O_2$ or $N_2$ambient. The CET of films after hydrogen forming gas anneal almost did not vary compared with that before hydrogen gas anneal. Hysteresis of $HfO_2$films abruptly decreased by hydrogen forming gas anneal because hysteresis in C-V characteristics depends on the bulk effect rather than $HfO_2$/Si interface. The lower trap densities of films annealed in $O_2$ambient than those in $N_2$were due to the composition of interfacial layer becoming closer to $SiO_2$with increasing oxygen partial pressure. Hydrogen forming gas anneal at $350^{\circ}C$ for samples annealed at various temperatures in $O_2$and $N_2$ambient plays critical role in decreasing interface trap densities at the Si/$SiO_2$ interface. However, effect of forming gas anneal was almost disappeared for samples annealed at high temperature (about $800^{\circ}C$) in $O_2$ or $N_2$ambient.

Keywords

References

  1. G. D. Wilk and R. M. Wallace, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2854 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.124036
  2. B. H. Lee, L. Kang, W. J. Qi, R. Nieh, Y. Jeon, K. Onishi, and J. C. Lee, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet. 133 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.1999.823863
  3. G. D. Wilk and R. M. Wallace, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 112 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.125673
  4. G. D. Wilk, R. M. Wallace, and J. M. Anthony, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 484 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.371888
  5. M. Balog, M, Schieber, M. Michman, and S. Patai, Thin Solid Films, 41, 247 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(77)90312-1
  6. L. Kang, K. onishi, Y. Jeon, B. H. Lee, C. Kang, W. Qi, R. Nieh, S. Gopalan, R. Choi, and J. C. Lee, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet. 35 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2000.904253
  7. B. H. Lee, R. Choi, L. Kang, S. Gopalan, R. Nieh, K. Onishi, Y Jeon, W. Qi, C. Kang, and J. C. Lee, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet. 39 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2000.904254
  8. S. J. Lee, H. F. Luan, W. P. Bai, C. H. Lee, T. S. Jeon, Y. Senzaki, D. Roberts, and D. L. Kwong, Tech. Dig. Int. Electron Devices Meet. 31 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2000.904252
  9. L. M. Terman, Solid-State Electron, 5, 285 (1962) https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(62)90111-9
  10. L. Kang, B.H. Lee, W. J. Qi, and J. C. Lee, IEEE Electr. Dev. Lett. 21,181 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1109/55.830975