Usefulness of Single Voxel Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Evaluation of Hippocampal Sclerosis

  • Kee-Hyun Chang (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine ) ;
  • Hong Dae Kim (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine ) ;
  • Sun-Won Park (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine ) ;
  • In Chan Song (Institute of Radiation Medicine) ;
  • In Kyu Yu (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine ) ;
  • Moon Hee Han (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine ) ;
  • Sang Kun Lee (Neuroscience Research Institute, SNUMRC) ;
  • Chun-Kee Chung (Neuroscience Research Institute, SNUMRC) ;
  • Yang Hee Park (Department of Radiology, National Police Hospital)
  • Received : 1999.10.19
  • Accepted : 2000.02.09
  • Published : 2000.03.31

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of our study was to determine the ability of H-1 MR spectroscopy (MRS) to lateralize the lesion in patients with hippocampal sclerosis. Materials and Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers and 25 patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy whose MR imaging diagnosis was unilateral hippocampal sclerosis were included. This diagnosis was based on the presence of unilateral atrophy and/or high T2 signal intensity of the hippocampus. Single-voxel H-1 MRS was carried out on a 1.5-T unit using PRESS sequence (TE, 136 msec). Spectra were obtained from hippocampal areas bilaterally with volumes of interest (VOIs) of 6.0 cm3 and 2.25 cm3 in healthy volunteers, and of either 6.0 cm3 (n = 14) or 2.25 cm3 (n = 11) in patients. Metabolite ratios of NAA/Cho and NAA/Cr were calculated from relative peak height measurements. The capability of MRS to lateralize the lesion and to detect bilateral abnormalities was compared with MR imaging diagnosis as a standard of reference. Results: In healthy volunteers, NAA/Cho and NAA/Cr ratios were greater than 0.8 and 1.0, respectively. In patients, the mean values of these ratios were significantly lower on the lesion side than on the contralateral side, and lower than those of healthy volunteers (p < .05). The overall correct lateralization rate of MRS was 72% (18/25); this rate was lower with a VOI of 6.0 cm3 than of 2.25 cm3 (64% versus 82%, p < .05). Bilateral abnormalities on MRS were found in 24% (6/25) of cases. Conclusion: Although its rate of correct lateralization is low, single-voxel H-1 MRS is a useful and promising diagnostic tool in the evaluation of hippocampal sclerosis, particularly for the detection of bilateral abnormalities. To improve the diagnostic accuracy of H-1 MRS, further investigation, including the use of a smaller VOI and measurement of the absolute amount of metabolites, are needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea (HMP-99-N-02-0003).

References

  1. Babb TI, Brown WJ. Pathological findings in epilepsy. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1987:511-540 
  2. Bruton CJ. The neuropathology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1988 
  3. Jack CR, Sharbrough FW, Cascino GD, Hirschorn KA, O Brien PC, Marsh WR. Magnetic resonance image-based hippocampal volumetry: correlation with outcome after temporal lobectomy. Ann Neurol 1992;31:138-146 
  4. Jack CR. Epilepsy: surgery and imaging. Radiology 1993;189:635-646 
  5. Bronen RA. Epilepsy: the role of MR imaging. AJR 1992;159:1165-1174 
  6. Jayakar P, Duchowny M, Resnick TJ, Alvarez LA. Localization of seizure foci: pitfalls and caveats. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991;8:414-431 
  7. Connelly A, Jackson GD, Duncan JS, King MD, Gadian DG. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1994;44:1411-1417 
  8. Achten E, Santens P, Boon P, et al. Single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography for lateralization of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. AJNR 1998;19:1-8 
  9. Helveston W, Gilmore R, Roper S, et al. Intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of positron emission tomography with qualitative and quantitative MR. AJNR 1996;17:1515-1521 
  10. Song IC, Chang KH, Min KH, et al. H-1 MR spectroscopic patterns of normal adult brain. J Korean Radiol Soc 1996;35:435-440 
  11. Barker PB, Soher BJ, Blackband SJ, Chatham JC, Mathews VP, Bryan RN. Quantitation of proton NMR spectra of the human brain using tissue water as an internal concentration reference. NMR Biomed 1993;6:89-94 
  12. Moonen CT, von Kienlin M, Gillen J, et al. Comparison of single-shot localization methods (STEAM and PRESS) for in vivo proton NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed 1989;2:201-208 
  13. Gadian DG, Connelly A, Duncan JS, et al. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the investigation of intractable epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 1994;152(S):116-121 
  14. Cendes F, Andermann F, Preul MC, et al. Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy based on regional metabolic abnormalities in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic images. Ann Neurol 1994;35:211-216 
  15. Garcia PA, Laxer KD, Ng T. Application of spectroscopic imaging in epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:1181-1185 
  16. Cross JH, Connelly A, Jackson GD, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in children with temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1996;39:107-113 
  17. Hugg JW, Laxer KD, Matson GB, et al. Neuron loss localizes human temporal lobe epilepsy by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Ann Neurol 1993;34:788-794 
  18. Epstein CM, Boor D, Hoffman JC, et al. Evaluation of 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging as a diagnostic tool for the lateralization of epileptogenic seizure foci. Br J Radiol 1996;69:15-24 
  19. Matthews PM, Andermann F, Arnold DL. A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of focal epilepsy in humans. Neurology 1990;40:985-989 
  20. Thompson JE, Castillo M, Kwock L, Walters B, Beach R. Usefulness of proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy. AJR 1998;170:771-776 
  21. Margerison JH, Corsellis JAN. Epilepsy and the temporal lobes. Brain 1966;89:499-530