Analysis of Quartz Contents by XRD and FTIR in Respirable Dust from Various Manufacturing Industries Part 2 - Ceramics, Stone, Concrete, Glass and Briquets, etc.

제조업체에서 발생하는 호흡성분진중 XRD와 FTIR를 이용한 결정형유리규산 농도의 분석 제2부 : 요업, 석재, 콘크리트, 유리, 연탄 및 기타사업장

  • Kim, Hyunwook (Dept. of Occupational Hygiene, Graduate School of Occupational Health, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Phee, Young Gyu (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Roh, Young Man (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Won, Jeoung Il (Industrial Safety Bureau, Ministry of Labour)
  • 김현욱 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 산업보건대학원) ;
  • 피영규 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 노영만 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 원정일 (노동부 산업보건환경과)
  • Published : 1999.05.14

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate crystalline silica contents in airborne respirable dusts from various manufacturing industries and to compare analytical ability of two different methods of quantifying crystalline silica, X-ray diffraction(XRD) and Fourie transform infrared spectroscopy(FTIR). Various manufacturing industries with a history of having pneumoconiosis cases and also known to generate dusts containing crystalline silica were investigated. These industries include: ceramics, brick, concrete, and abrasive material etc. The personal respirable dust samples were collected using l0mm, Dorr-Oliver nylon cyclone equipped with 37mm, $5{\mu}m$ pore size. polyvinylchloride (PVC) filters as collection media. All samples were weighed before and after sampling and were pretreated according to the NIOSH sampling and analytical methods 7500, and 7602 for dust collection and quartz analysis. A total of 48 samples were collected from these industries. Initial analyses of these samples showed log-normal distributions for dust and quartz concentrations. Some results from ceramics and stone exceeded current Korean Occupational Exposure Limits. The average concentrations of personal respirable dust by cyclone were 0.43, 0.24, 0.26, 0.42, 0.53 and $0.29mg/m^3$ in ceramics, stone, concrete, glass, briquets, and others, respectively. A comparison of performance of two analytical methods for quantifying crystalline silica was performed using data from ceramics. The results showed that no significant difference was found between two methods for ceramics. The mean crystalline silica contents determined by XRD were 3.41 % of samples from briquets and 7.18 % from ceramics and were 2.58 % from concrete and 10.33 % from ceramics by FTIR. For crystalline silica analysis, two analytical techniques were highly correlated with $r^2=0.81$ from ceramics. Both cristobalite and tridymite were not detected by XRD and FTIR.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단, 기초과학지원연구소(서울분소)