Korean Management Science Review (경영과학)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지

The design strategy of accounting information systems for the increase of personal office productivity

개인의 사무생산성 증대를 위한 회계정보시스템 설계방안

  • Published : 1997.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper represents an exploratory effort to test empirically the contingent relationships between the contextual variables, such as user task characteristics and personality, and the information characteristics of Accounting Information Systems (AIS), and to prove the effects of influence factors on the increase of personal office productivity. In this study, it was suggested that personal office productivity is influenced by the fit between the contextual variables and the information dimensions of ALS. It was also proved that influence factors have a positive effect on the increase of personal office productivity.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국과학기술원, 박사 학위 논문 사용자 참여와 경영정보시스템의 이용:상황적 모형 및 과정 중심적 분석 김은홍
  2. 경영과학의 응용 v.2 MIS 성과에대한 평가 모형 이진주;김상훈
  3. 컴퓨터 마인더'93
  4. Proceedings of the office Automation Conference The Impact of automated office systems on the productivity of managers and professionals Abraham
  5. Management Science v.23 no.8 Cognitive and personality tests for the design of Management Information Systems Bariff,M.;Lusk,E.
  6. Information & Management v.1 An investigation of information system utilization Barkin,S.;Dickson,G.
  7. Journal of Management Information Systems v.4 no.4 A Short form measure of user information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and notes on use Baroudi,J.;Orlikowski,W.
  8. Journal of Systems Management Productivity improvement for office systems Baumgardner
  9. MIS Quarterly The impact of cognitive styles on information system design Benbasat,I.;Taylor,R.
  10. Decision Science v.15 Cognitive style and the usefulness of information Blaylock,B.;Rees,L.
  11. Information & Management v.7 no.2 A descriptive model of success for computer based information systems Bruwer,P.
  12. Journal of Personality Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variables Budner,S.
  13. Journal of System Management Solutions to productivity problems Byars
  14. Journal of Systems Management v.31 no.12 Information systems success factors Cerullo,M.J.
  15. Academy of Management Journal v.25 no.1 Organizational characteristics and information systems: An exploratory investigation Cheney,P.H.;Dickson,G.W.
  16. Journal of Management Information Systems v.3 no.1 Organizational factors affecting the success of end user computing Cheney,P.H.;Mann,R.;Amoroso,D.
  17. The Accounting Review The impact of structure,environment & interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems Chenhall,R.;Morris,D.
  18. Accounting Organizations & Society v.21 no.5 Management accounting systems, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note Chonh,V.K.
  19. Information & Management v.19 What is being done to measure user satisfaction with EDP/MIS Conarth,D.;Mignen,O.
  20. MIS Quarterly Chauffeured versus end user access to commercial databases: The effects of task and individual differences Culnan,M.J.
  21. Sloan Management Review no.Fall Intellectual Technologies: The key to improving whitecollar productivity Curley;Pyburn
  22. The Accounting Review Cognitive characteristics & the perceived importance of information Dermer,J.D.
  23. Management Science v.23 no.9 Research in management information systems: The minesota experiments Dickson,G.;Senn,J.;Chervany,N.
  24. MIS Quarterly v.9 no.1 Avenues for top management involvement in successful MIS development Doll,W.J.
  25. Journal of Systems Management Office productivity Factors Drange
  26. Accounting, Organizations & Society v.6 no.4 The external organizational environment & its impact on management information systems Ewusi Mensah,K.
  27. Decision Science v.17 Organizational context, user involvement and the usefulness of information systems Franz,C.R.;Robey,D.
  28. Information & Management v.18 Effect of the Quality of user documentation on user satisfaction with information systems Gemoets,L.;Mahmood,M.
  29. Accounting, Organization & Society v.5 no.4 An organizational contingencis view of accounting & information system implementation Ginzberg,M.J.
  30. Accounting, Organization & Society v.3 no.4 Strategic decision processes & the design of accounting information systems Gordon,L.;Larcker,D.;Tuggle,F.
  31. Accounting, Organization & Society v.1 no.1 A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems Gordon,L.;Miller,D.
  32. Accounting, Organization & Society v.9 no.1 Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty & organization structure Gordon,L.;Narayanan,V.K.
  33. Sloan Management Review v.13 no.1 A framework for MIS Gorry,G.;Scott Morton,M.
  34. Journal of Systems management Principles of office automation Greenwood & Greenwood
  35. Accounting, Organization & Society v.19 no.4 The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial per formance: A test of three-way interaction Gul,F.A.;Chia,Y.M.
  36. Information & Management v.6 Assessing participative systems design: Some conclusions from an exploratory study Hirschheim,R.A.
  37. MIS Quarterly v.9 no.4 User experience with and assessment of participative systems design Hirschheim,R.A.
  38. Management Science v.26 no.9 A framework for research in computer based management information systems Ives,B.;Hamilton,S.;Davis,G.B.
  39. Journal of Systems Management Before and after WP: An office automation productivity study Kapsales
  40. MIS Quarterly Value analysis: Justifying decision support systems Keen,P.G.
  41. Information & Management v.11 no.2 An exploratory contingency model of user participation and MIS use Kim,E.;Lee,J.
  42. Information & Management v.19 Task characteristics, decentralization, and the success of hospital information systems Kim,K.
  43. MIS Quarterly Evaluating MIS King,W.;Rodriguez,J.
  44. MIS Quarterly An experimental validation of the Gorry and Scott Morton framework Kirs,P.;Sanders,G.;Cerveny,R.;Robey,D.
  45. Journal of Systems Management Does automation necessarily mean an increase in productivity Kleim
  46. Journal of Management Information Systems v.5 no.3 Individual differences and decision making using various levels of aggregation of information Lederer,A.;Smith,G.
  47. Journal of Management Systems v.5 no.3 The effects of display formats on information systems design Liberatore,M.;Titus,G.;Dixon,P.
  48. The Accounting Review The use of an accounting information system, action & organizational performance Lucas,H.C.
  49. Information & Management v.1 User department technology and information design Macintosh,N.;Daft,R.
  50. Journal of Management Information Systems v.4 no.4 An investigation of the effects of age,size and hardware option on the critical success factors applicable to information centers Magal;Carr
  51. Information & Management v.10 Office automation benefits: A framework Maggiolini,P.
  52. Journal of Management Information Systems v.11 no.3 Effects of organizational maturity on end-users satisfaction with information systems Mahmood,M.A.;Becker,J.D.
  53. MIS Quarterly v.8 no.1 A contingency Model for user involvement in DSS development Mann,R.;Watson,H.
  54. Academy Management Journal v.23 no.3 The determinants of computer based information system performance Mansour;Watson,H.
  55. The Accounting Review The effects of personality on a subject's information processing Mcghee,W.;Shields,M.;Birnberg,J.
  56. MIS Quarterly v.12 no.2 Factors affecting information satisfaction in the context of the small business environment Montazemi,A.R.
  57. Harvard Business Review Managing the crises in data processing Nolan,R.L.
  58. Harvard Business Review v.60 no.4 Managing information systems by committee Nolan,R.L.
  59. Psychometric Theory Nunally,J.
  60. Accounting, Organizations & Society v.5 no.5 The contingency theory of management accounting:achievement & prognosis Otley
  61. Journal of Management Information Systems no.Spring An assessment of productivity and operations control as motives for office automation Paddock,C.E.
  62. American Sociological Review v.32 A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations Perrow
  63. MIS Quarterly v.7 no.3 The impact of information management on the organization: Two scenarios Powers,D.J.
  64. Accounting, Organizations & Society v.1 no.4 The influence of organizational and personal factors on the use of accounting information: An empirical study Rahman,M.;Mccosh,A.
  65. MIS Quarterly Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business Raymond,L.
  66. Journal of Management Information Systems v.6 no.4 Organization context and information systems success: A contingency approach Raymond,L.
  67. Academy of Management Journal v.22 no.3 User attitude and management information system use Robey,D.
  68. Systems, Objectives & Solutions v.4 MIS/DSS success measure Sanders,G.L.
  69. MIS Quarterly v.9 no.1 A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success Sanders,G.L.;Courtney,J.F.
  70. Administrative Science Quarterly v.26 Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory Schoonhoven
  71. Academy of Management Review An information task approach to organizaitonal communication Scott Poole
  72. Information & Management v.8 Assessing the organizational climate for OA implementation Snyder,C.;Ledbetter,W.;Cox,J.
  73. MIS Quarterly Job characteristics as indicants of CBIS data requirements Specht,P.H.
  74. MIS Quarterly v.12 no.1 The effect of user involvement on system success: A contingency approach Tait,P.;Vessey,I.
  75. Journal of Business The organization of EDP activities and computer use Vanlommel;Debrabander
  76. Administrative Science Quarterly v.19 A task contingent model of work unit structure Van de ven;Delbecq
  77. Journal of Systems Management v.28 no.9 Top management's computer role Willoughby;Pye
  78. Management Science v.25 no.10 Indivldual differences and MIS success Zmud,R.W.