AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BOND STRENGTH OF GLASSIONOMER CEMENT TO DENTIN SURFACE FOLLOWING ACID TREATMENT

산처리(酸處理)에 따른 상아질(象牙質)에 대한 Glassionomer Cement의 접착강도(接着强度)에 관(關)한 실험적(實驗的) 연구(硏究)

  • Lee, Won-Seob (Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Min, Byung-Soon (Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Ho-Young (Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 이원섭 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 민병순 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 최호영 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실)
  • Published : 1988.02.25

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of glassionomer cement against cut dentin surface which was treated with various surface cleaning agents. 48 freshly extracted human 3rd molars were ground flat through the enamel into the dentin using 600 grit silicone carbide paper under a flow of water. The were divided into four groups by the following cleaning procedure on cut dentin surface; Group I : No surface treatment after grinding with 600 grit silicone carbide paper as control group Group II : Surface treatment with 50% citric acid for 30 seconds. Group III : Surface treatment with 37% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds. Group IV : Surface treatment with 10% poly acrylic acid for 30 seconds. The specimens in 4 groups were immersed in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours before testing after cleanising with water-spray and drying with air. Bond strength was measured with Instron Universal Testing Machine (Autograph S-100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, JAPAN). The results were as follows: 1. The bond strengths of group II, III & IV were not seemed to be shown more significant improvement than a group I. 2. The bond strengths in groups which were treated with 50% citric acid, 37% phosphoric acid and 10% polycrylic acid, were ranked 24.70kg/$cm^2$, 22.02kg/$cm^2$ and 31.13kg/$cm^2$, but its difference was not significant, statistically.

Keywords