산촌주민(山村住民) 산림보호(山林保護)에 대한 경제적(經濟的) 심리적요인(心理的要因) 분석(分析) -산림생산구조(山林生産構造)에 따르는 경제심리상(經濟心理狀)-

An Analysis of Economic and Psychological Factors on the Forest Protection of the Mountain People in Jeonbuk Province -On the Economic Psychological Status Associated with Structure in Forest Production-

  • Lee, Kwang Won (College of Agriculture, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae Seng (College of Agriculture, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 1977.12.10
  • 발행 : 1977.12.30

초록

산림보호(山林保護)와 관련된 산촌주민(山村住民)의 산림(山林)에 대한 경제적(經濟的) 심리적요인(心理的要因)을 분석(分析)한 결과 산촌농가(山村農家)의 산림수익(山林收益)에 대한 전망(展望)은 비교적(比較的) 높은 편이나 그의 소유규모(所有規模) 가계충족경제형태(家計充足經濟形態)이고 자본(資本)의 영세성(零細性)과 도벌(盜伐)등 사후관리(事後管理) 등에 우려(憂慮)를 표하고 있는데 불법산림채취(不法山林採取)의 가장 큰 이유가 되는 연료(燃料)해결 문제가 큰 난제(難題)의 하나였다. 더욱 문제가 되는 것은 산촌(山村)에 거주하면서도 산림(山林)을 소유(所有)하지 않은 계층(階層)으로 연료(燃料)의 대부분(大部分)을 타인(他人)이나 국공유림(國公有林)에서 몰래 채취하고 있는데 산림(山林)은 베어쓸 수도 있다는 삼림공유(山林公有)의 자세와 산림법(山林法)의 운용도 문제시(問題視)하지 않는 산림보호(山林保護)에 극히 소극적이었다. 이것은 평야부산촌(平野部山村)에서 보다 산간부산촌(山間部山村)에서 심한 경향(傾向)이 있었으며 이에 대한 산림법(山林法)의 운용(運用)이나 교육(敎育)에 문제점을 제기할 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study are to analyze economic and psychological factors associated with the forest protection of the mountain people, and to explain the forms of the forest management by ownership classes, especially with forest in the production structure of the mountain villages, particulary from Aprial 1st to 20th in 1975. And the basis of the data for this study is to have been obtained by the sample of 462 households, in Jeonbuk province, which were selected by the method of Yandom sampling. In order to determine what relations there are between the forest ownership classes are independent and each of the selected economic and psychological factors, the chi-squre test was used. The findings may be summarized as follows; 1. The area per household forest land of the mountain villages farm families with forest was 1.4ha and are middle classes with the cultivated area, and manage their forest in favor of the forest fuel and the byproducts, which we call "Earn Ownership Management Form". As it is acomplished by the agricultural surplus labor, we can't expect the positive forest investments. 2. The expectation of the proceeds of forest investments seems to be high but 30% of them doubtful. And the mountain villages farm families with above 3ha forest area expect their forest investments to be positive and in future they have hope in the economic management from. 3. The mountainous mountain fram families reply to a small sums of capital and the control of after the fact on account of the negative factors of forest investment. But rural mountain villages farm famillies assist on spending too much money for the control and nexious insects damage. 4. The reason about illegal cut away was mainly their fuels problem and then most of moumtain farm villages was used to forest fuel in their fuel. But 57% of mountainous mountain villages farm families not having forest area, and 66% of them get their fual on the self-supply, and 66.9% of them get from public and nationat forest and other's forest. That is one of the big problems of the forest protection. 5. Above 66% of mountain people think that forest law is severe and 50% of mountainous mountain villages farm families think if usual. Especially ones not having forest area but taking advantage of forest among them think so. 6. Rural mountain villages farm families have comparatively positive attitude for protecting forest, but mountainous mountain villages farm families negative. Classes with above 3ha forest area have more outlook of forest protection. And the more such classes are, the better they can protect forest. 7. There are problem about operation and education of the forest law on the mountainous mountain villages farm families.

키워드