• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.963-973
• /
• 2008

Clothing pressure is closely connected with the degree of comfort of an athlete's tight-fitting garments. Therefore, the construction of sports garments is very important to the wearer's athletic performance. In this study, the fundamental relationship between the reduction rates of stretch fabrics and clothing pressure was explored with the aim of improving clothing comfort and obtaining a systematic pattern reduction for women's tight-fitting bodysuits. A women's bodysuit pattern was obtained by the draping method using a dressform. The basic pattern was divided into four parts and changed into reduced pattems according to the amount of fabric stretch determined by ASTM D2594. Clothing pressure was measured using an air-pack-type pressure sensor (model AMI 3037-2) at 20 locations (shoulder, 9 locations; bust, 5; and armhole, 6). Among the 15 garments tested, the mean pressure of the A1 bodysuit was 4.60 $gf/cm^2$, and that of the C5 bodysuit was 22.98 $gf/cm^2$. The mean pressures of the bodysuits with reduction rates of 10% and 20% were below 10 $gf/cm^2$, while those of suits with reduction rates of 30%,40%, and 50% (except C5) were below 20 $gf/cm^2$. The pressure at the shoulder was 9.50$\sim$32.24 $gf/cm^2$, which was higher than that at the bust (3.34$\sim$24.56 $gf/cm^2$) and the armhole (0.95$\sim$12.15 $gf/cm^2$). The mean pressures of the 15 bodysuits were divided into five groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and were found to be significantly different (p<0.001). Regression analysis afforded the following expression: mean pressure ($gf/cm^2$) = 1.607 + 0.369[reduction rate (%)].

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제29권12호
• /
• pp.1535-1545
• /
• 2005

신축성 소재 여성용 바디수트 원형 설계에 관한 선행연구에서 개발된 바디수트의 진동둘레길이 항목을 적용한 소매원형 제도방법이 제안되었다 본 연구는 선행연구와 연속적 맥락에서, 첫째, 신축성 소재의 물성을 고려한 패턴축소율의 적용을 제시하고 둘째, 그에 따라 개발된 여성용 바디수트 소매원형의 제도방법의 단계별 서술을 통해 교육 및 산업분야에서의 사용을 목적으로 하였다. 본 연구를 위하여 광범위하게 사용되고 있는 기존의 소매원형 제도방법을 우선, 선정하여(i.e. Joseph-Armstrong: T1, Shoben & Ward: T2, Esmod: T3 그리고 Joseph-Armstrong 절충식 : T4) 분석하였다. 그 가운데 소매의 앞 뒤차가 반영되지 않는(i.e. T1) 것과 반영되는(i.e. T2, T3 그리고 T4) 방법으로 나누어 구분하고 그에 따른 바디수트 소매샘플을 선행연구와 동일한 신축성 소재$(wale: 50\%/course: 70\%)$를 사용하여 제작한 후, 5인의 전문평가단을 구성하여 그 외관과 동작적합성을 평가하였다. 외관평가에서 관찰된 항목은 앞, 옆, 뒤 바디수트 소매의 여유분, 중심선의 위치와 소매길이, 그리고 바디수트 몸판과의 조화정도의 총 13항목이었고, 쾌적성 평가에서는 전방수직, 측방수직, 측방수평 3동작을 통해 실험의의 동작적합성을 평가하였으며 최종적으로 외관과 동작성이 적절히 조화된 바디수트 소매원형을 제안하는 과정을 거쳤다. 외관평가에서 T3>T4>T2>T1 순서로 우수하게 평가되었으며, 동작적합성 평가에서는 T1>T4>T2>T3의 순으로 평가되어, 외관적으로는 여유분이 적어 당겨 보이는 이유로 점수가 낮아도 쾌적성에서는 오히려 죄어주는 것이 안정감이 있다고 분석되었다. 따라서 외관과 쾌적감의 균형을 고려하였을 때 최종적으로 T4,즉, 소재의 신축성에 따른 패턴축소율(전체소매길이 : 1.0RR, 소매산높이 : 0.7RR, 팔꿈치둘레: 0.9RR)이 반영되고, 진동둘레에 제로 이즈량을 부가하였으며, 앞뒤차가 반영된 바디수트 소매 원형 제도방법 이 제안되었다.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.892-903
• /
• 2006

This study was to carry out interview and survey of currently marketed foundation garment, focusing on manufacturers, on the basis of data of Year 2004 SIZE KOREA in 2004, to re-establish suitable age range and standard size, to simplify size interval scale and size system and to revise the standard for consumers' easy understanding and availability; The findings of this study are as follows. 1. Considering the age, in which a bra is worn, has reduced socially, the applicable age range was expanded into $8{\sim}80$ years old, which was divided into for junior and for adult. 2. For bra size, the standard title changed into the foundation garments size standard, in which girdle and bodysuit were included. 3. Basic physical parts for establishing for bra size are underbust and bust. Interval scale of under bust and bust was 5cm and 2.5cm, respectively. And basic physical parts are waist and hip girth for girdle, and underbust, bust, and hip girth for bodysuit. 4. For bra size, underbust girth was applied together with bra-cup size without 'cm' unit. For bra-cup size, difference between underbust and bust was represented as English alphabet. In other words, AAA means that difference between under bust and bust is 5cm. AA, A, B, C and D means that the difference are 7.5cm, 10cm, 12.5cm, 15cm and 17.5cm. 5. For girdle size, waist girth was applied together with hip girth without 'cm' unit. And for bodysuit size, underbust girth was applied together with cup size like bra size, and English alphabet represented hip girth range.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제30권7호
• /
• pp.1146-1159
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to offer body suit sizing system for young women aged 18-24. Many anthropometric measurements and other related data form 418 subjects were analyzed by various statistical methods. As a result of cluster analysis, we categorized somatotypes into 3 types: H-type, A-type, N-type as the most common. Subjects was covered 86.5% by KS body suit sizing system and 33.2% by body suit company. So we considered to produce AAA, AA cup size and small size body suit for raising the coverage. As size distribution by cluster analysis, H-type was mainly distributed ${70{\sim}85(AAA{\sim}D)}$ and M, L's hip size. A-type was mostly was ranged ${70{\sim}85(A{\sim}C)}$ and S, M size. N-type was widely showed ${65{\sim}85(AAA{\sim}I)}$ and S, M, L's hip size. Accordingly, it is reasonable to consider size distribution and physical characteristics by these figure types when suggesting sizing system as well as design and production.