• 제목/요약/키워드: well abandonment

검색결과 23건 처리시간 0.016초

암환자의 대체요법 시행경험 (The Experiences of Trial Alternative Therapies for Cancer Patients)

  • 고덕순;정연강
    • 가정간호학회지
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.109-120
    • /
    • 2001
  • This study has been done in order to help the people understand the cancer patients and provide the basic materials for the care of cancer patients by deeply understanding the living experience of the practice of alternative therapy for cancer patients. Data were collected with several in depth interviews and observations. Collected datas were analyzed by using phenomenological method of study by Giorgi (1970). The trial experience of alternative therapy for cancer patients has been classified into the one of having concerns, following, being infatuated, and coming out by pushing, and the experience of having concerns appeared as the meaning of the limit of modern medicine, despair, loneliness. hope, emotional support. dissolution of the feeling of uneasiness. the feeling of burden of the medical expense, self-treating, the subject of treatment. and indifference while the experience of following appeared as the meaning of blind following, temptation, going outside to look for something, wandering. following unconditionally, advise of the professionals, mistaken belief. self-abandonment, powerlessness. disconnection of dialogue with the medical staff. elevation of immunity, strengthening the physical power, absence of the source of examined information, clinging, self-responsibility. the experience of being infatuated appeared as the meaning of thorough trial. affirmative experience. devotion. diverse efforts, faithful trial. affirmative self-suggestion. change of the style of life. the feeling of burden of expense, being envious, bitter feeling toward the family, considering family, family discords, and difficulty of enforcement. The experience of coming out by pushing appeared as the meaning of waiting. self-reflection. maintaining the distance. cutting attachment, throwing the greed away, coming out by pushing. being thoughtful. accepting disease. individual difference of physical quality, and ambivalence. But they return to the experience of being concerned all over again in case of recurrence or metastasis of the disease even though they come out of such stage, and they always have ambivalence even in the condition with no recurrence and metastasis. In conclusion, the trial of alternative therapy for cancer patients could be explained as the adaptive behavior to the disease which is difficult to be cured. the cancer. The cancer patients are exposed to the side effects and harm without the examined information resources. Therefore the nurse should well aware of the alternative therapy and be able to do the appropriative management through the open communication with the patients who are under the trial of alternative therapy.

  • PDF

독일목록규칙의 기본기입선정에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Choice of Main Entry in German Cataloging Rules; a comparison with the title entry in the Orient)

  • 김태수
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제21권
    • /
    • pp.61-101
    • /
    • 1991
  • This study reviews the development and change of main entry principle in German cataloging codes, with special emphasis on RAK. With rerard to the functions of catalog, comparison between the traditional title main entry in the Orient and author main entry in the West has been made. The analysis confirms in this study that various criteria in choice of the entries in RAK have been adopted. In case of works where the persons who have played different roles in the works are named on the title page, as well as related works and works of mixed responsibility, the criteria of entry determination are complex and time consuming process and have no absolute value. And there are also various kinds of problems in corporate entries including confirmation of originator(Urheber), choice of either the territorial authority corncerned or corporate bodies as an entry depending on the nature of the publications, and a unique bibliographical situation of treaties. This means the code is absence of absolute value in selecting entries, and this results in adoption of main entry principle which has lost its significance for the purpose of cataloging. With emergence of the ISBD and actualization of automated cataloging, morever, all entries are equal as points of access. It would eliminate the need for personal judgements required in choice of main entry by the present code. In doing so, it would bring uniformity and standardization to cataloging practice. In direct approach to works, title entry is more developed finding device than author entry in cataloging theories. Thus introduction of unit card system beginning with title which is adopted in KCR3 would be desirable, the complicated rules for the choice of entry could be abandoned from cataloging codes. Most of the user studies show that catalog users have placed higher value on the title entry as a finding device and each entry is equal as access points through unit entry. This means that choice of a given entry as a main entry is unnecessary in cataloging codes. Title entry would be a rather simple standard and direct approach for works. This study proves that the traditional title entry of Korea is superior to author main entry in the Western world in cataloging theory. Thus recommendation to be made is that abandonment of author main entry from cataloging codes should be considered in the future.

  • PDF

관습적 오류 혹은 의도적 프로파간다: 북한관련 '의혹'의 실체적 진실과 담론 왜곡의 구조 (Habitual Fallacy or Intentional Propaganda: Understanding the Mechanism of Re-constructing North Korean Myth)

  • 김성해;류로;김동규
    • 의정연구
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.187-226
    • /
    • 2017
  • 한국 사회에서 유통되고 있는 지배적인 북한담론은 의혹투성이다. 특정한 정치적 목적과 이해관계는 물론 집단기억과 정서 등에 의해 상당부분 왜곡되어있다. 물론 일부는 북한의 잘못된 행동에 근거를 둔 '진실'도 있지만, 부분적인진실 또는 때로 '명백한 허위'에 가까운 내용도 많다. 국내 언론은 북한에 관한'진실'을 적극적으로 발굴하려고 노력하지 않을뿐더러 한번 잘못 전해진 '허위' 사실 조차도 '팩트'에 대한 교정이 없다. 그러나 대한민국의 일그러진 북한담론이 초래할 수 있는 위협은 실질적이며 돌이킬 수 없는 대가를 요구한다. 북한의 정책을 잘못 판단할 수도 있으며, 국민의 정서적 반발을 부추길 수 있고, 무엇보다 합리적이고 건설적인 정책 형성에 방해가 된다. 본 연구는 이런 우려에서 출발했으며 2002년 불거진 HEU (고농축우라늄) 프로그램 의혹, 방코델타아시아(BDA)를 통한 위조지폐 의혹 및 제네바협상 파기 등을 분석했다. 첫 번째 연구문제로는 이들 3개의 의혹에 대한 실체적 진실은 무엇인가로 설정했다. 이를 위해 미국 정부, 학계와 싱크탱크 및 언론 등의 관련 자료는 물론 중국과 국내의 2차 자료도 분석했다. 또 다른 연구문제로는 시간이 지남에 따라 '의혹'의 실체가 밝혀지는 가운데 국내 언론이 이를 제대로 반영하고 있는지로 정했다. 국내 언론에 등장하는 원인과 대책에 대한 주요 주장을 정리하고 '프레임'을 귀납적으로 재구성했다. 끝으로, 국내 언론은 어떤 구조적 요인에 의해 '의혹'을 재생산하고 있는가를 질문했다. 2017년 한국이 직면하고 있는 위기는 상당 부분 '인간'에 의해 만들어진 측면이 강하다. 현실을 재창조하는 것으로 알려진 관련 담론을 해체함으로써 평화를 위한 작은 디딤돌을놓고자 하는 것이 연구자들의 소망이다.