• 제목/요약/키워드: trachytic rock

검색결과 13건 처리시간 0.02초

울릉도 시추 코어의 상온 전기비저항과 물성 간의 상관성 (Electrical Resistivity at Room Temperature and Relation between Physical Properties of Core Samples from Ulleung Island)

  • 이태종;이상규;연관희
    • 지구물리와물리탐사
    • /
    • 제18권4호
    • /
    • pp.171-180
    • /
    • 2015
  • 울릉도 지열조사 시추공에서 채취한 암석코어 중 약 20 m 간격으로 수집한 23개의 코어시료에 대하여 수포화 전기비저항과 건조 전기비저항, 건조밀도와 유효공극률을 측정하고, 암석코어 별 전기비저항 범위를 제시하였으며 물성간 상관성을 분석하였다. 암석코어의 건조과정 말미에 질소가스를 주입함으로써 습기의 공극내 유입 및 흡착을 지연시켜 건조 전기비저항을 측정할 수 있는 전처리 방법을 고안하였다. 측정된 물성 상호간의 상관성을 분석한 결과, 울릉도 암석코어의 건조밀도는 유효공극률과 매우 높은 상관성을 보였는데, 특히 '건조밀도 감소에 대한 유효공극률 증가율'이 암종에 따라서 큰 차이를 보여서 현무암질 화산쇄설암이 가장 크고 조면암질 화산쇄설암, 조면암의 순으로 작아진다. 따라서 울릉도 암석코어는 건조밀도와 유효공극률의 상관성 분석만으로도 암종 구별이 용이한 특징을 나타내었다. 수포화 전기비저항은 유효공극률 및 건조 밀도와 매우 높은 상관성을 보이는 반면 건조 전기비저항은 이들과 특별한 상관관계를 찾을 수 없었다.

울릉도 화산암의 주원소, 휘토류 및 미량원소 지구화학 (Major, Rare-Earth and Trace Geochemistry of Ulleungdo Volcanic Rocks)

  • 송용선;박계헌;박맹언
    • 암석학회지
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.57-70
    • /
    • 1999
  • 울릉도의 화산암들은 매우 높은 알칼리 함량을 보이며 대부분 K2O/Na2O 비율이 높은 K-계열에 속한다. 울릉도의 화산암들은 매우 넓은 범위에 걸친 조성변화를 보여 총알칼리-실리카 분류도에 현무암으로부터 조면현무암, 현무암질 조면안산암, 조면안산암을 거처 조면암에 이르기까지의 범위를 차지한다. 이러한 조성의 일반적인 변화경향은 광물의 정출에 의한 분화에 의해 대체로 잘 설명되며 감람석, 단사휘석, 사장석, 티탄철석 및 인회석이 주된 정출광물로 판단된다. 울릉도 화산암의 Nb/U, Pb/Ce 값은 MORB, OIB등과 같은 해양성 화산암과 같으며 도호환경의 암석들과는 상당한 차이가 있어 이들의 생성이 일본열도를 연한 섭입작용과는 직접적인 관계가 없음을 말해준다. LREE가 HREE에 비해 매우 부화된 모슴을 보인다((La)N=193-420, (Lu)N=7.5-19.5). 다양한 암석중 조면암-1만이 두드러진 음의 뗘 이상치를 갖으며 상당한 사장석의 정출을 수반하여 만들어진 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 조면암-2와 조면암-3 및 포놀라이트와 부석등은 미량원소와 희토류원소의 변화경향이 조면암-1과 다르며, 별도의 마그마 솥에서 만들어져 서로 다른 분화경로를 갖고 진화한 것으로 판단된다. 울릉도 화산암에서는 성분의 양분화 및 중간 조성의 결핌 현상이 현저하게 나타난다.

  • PDF

포항(浦項) 및 장기분지(盆地)에 대한 고지자기(古地磁氣), 층서(層序) 및 구조연구(構造硏究); 화산암류(火山岩類)의 K-Ar 연대(年代) (Paleomagnetism, Stratigraphy and Geologic Structure of the Tertiary Pohang and Changgi Basins; K-Ar Ages for the Volcanic Rocks)

  • 이현구;문희수;민경덕;김인수;윤혜수;이타야 테츠마루
    • 자원환경지질
    • /
    • 제25권3호
    • /
    • pp.337-349
    • /
    • 1992
  • The Tertiary basins in Korea have widely been studied by numerous researchers producing individual results in sedimentology, paleontology, stratigraphy, volcanic petrology and structural geology, but interdisciplinary studies, inter-basin analysis and basin-forming process have not been carried out yet. Major work of this study is to elucidate evidences obtained from different parts of a basin as well as different Tertiary basins (Pohang, Changgi, Eoil, Haseo and Ulsan basins) in order to build up the correlation between the basins, and an overall picture of the basin architecture and evolution in Korea. According to the paleontologic evidences the geologic age of the Pohang marine basin is dated to be late Lower Miocence to Middle Miocene, whereas other non-marine basins are older as being either Early Miocene or Oligocene(Lee, 1975, 1978: Bong, 1984: Chun, 1982: Choi et al., 1984: Yun et al., 1990: Yoon, 1982). However, detailed ages of the Tertiary sediments, and their correlations in a basin and between basins are still controversial, since the basins are separated from each other, sedimentary sequence is disturbed and intruded by voncanic rocks, and non-marine sediments are not fossiliferous to be correlated. Therefore, in this work radiometric, magnetostratigraphic, and biostratigraphic data was integrated for the refinement of chronostratigraphy and synopsis of stratigraphy of Tertiary basins of Korea. A total of 21 samples including 10 basaltic, 2 porphyritic, and 9 andesitic rocks from 4 basins were collected for the K-Ar dating of whole rock method. The obtained age can be grouped as follows: $14.8{\pm}0.4{\sim}15.2{\pm}0.4Ma$, $19.9{\pm}0.5{\sim}22.1{\pm}0.7Ma$, $18.0{\pm}1.1{\sim}20.4+0.5Ma$, and $14.6{\pm}0.7{\sim}21.1{\pm}0.5Ma$. Stratigraphically they mostly fall into the range of Lower Miocene to Mid Miocene. The oldest volcanic rock recorded is a basalt (911213-6) with the age of $22.05{\pm}0.67Ma$ near Sangjeong-ri in the Changgi (or Janggi) basin and presumed to be formed in the Early Miocene, when Changgi Conglomerate began to deposit. The youngest one (911214-9) is a basalt of $14.64{\pm}0.66Ma$ in the Haseo basin. This means the intrusive and extrusive rocks are not a product of sudden voncanic activity of short duration as previously accepted but of successive processes lasting relatively long period of 8 or 9 Ma. The radiometric age of the volcanic rocks is not randomly distributed but varies systematically with basins and localities. It becomes generlly younger to the south, namely from the Changgi basin to the Haseo basin. The rocks in the Changgi basin are dated to be from $19.92{\pm}0.47$ to $22.05{\pm}0.67Ma$. With exception of only one locality in the Geumgwangdong they all formed before 20 Ma B.P. The Eoil basalt by Tateiwa in the Eoil basin are dated to be from $20.44{\pm}0.47$ to $18.35{\pm}0.62Ma$ and they are younger than those in the Changgi basin by 2~4 Ma. Specifically, basaltic rocks in the sedimentary and voncanic sequences of the Eoil basin can be well compared to the sequence of associated sedimentary rocks. Generally they become younger to the stratigraphically upper part. Among the basin, the Haseo basin is characterized by the youngest volcanic rocks. The basalt (911214-7) which crops out in Jeongja-ri, Gangdong-myon, Ulsan-gun is $16.22{\pm}0.75Ma$ and the other one (911214-9) in coastal area, Jujon-dong, Ulsan is $14.64{\pm}0.66Ma$ old. The radiometric data are positively collaborated with the results of paleomagnetic study, pull-apart basin model and East Sea spreading theory. Especially, the successively changing age of Eoil basalts are in accordance with successively changing degree of rotation. In detail, following results are discussed. Firstly, the porphyritic rocks previously known as Cretaceous basement (911213-2, 911214-1) show the age of $43.73{\pm}1.05$$49.58{\pm}1.13Ma$(Eocene) confirms the results of Jin et al. (1988). This means sequential volcanic activity from Cretaceous up to Lower Tertiary. Secondly, intrusive andesitic rocks in the Pohang basin, which are dated to be $21.8{\pm}2.8Ma$ (Jin et al., 1988) are found out to be 15 Ma old in coincindence with the age of host strata of 16.5 Ma. Thirdly, The Quaternary basalt (911213-5 and 911213-6) of Tateiwa(1924) is not homogeneous regarding formation age and petrological characteristics. The basalt in the Changgi basin show the age of $19.92{\pm}0.47$ and $22.05{\pm}0.67$ (Miocene). The basalt (911213-8) in Sangjond-ri, which intruded Nultaeri Trachytic Tuff is dated to be $20.55{\pm}0.50Ma$, which means Changgi Group is older than this age. The Yeonil Basalt, which Tateiwa described as Quaternary one shows different age ranging from Lower Miocene to Upper Miocene(cf. Jin et al., 1988: sample no. 93-33: $10.20{\pm}0.30Ma$). Therefore, the Yeonil Quarterary basalt should be revised and divided into different geologic epochs. Fourthly, Yeonil basalt of Tateiwa (1926) in the Eoil basin is correlated to the Yeonil basalt in the Changgi basin. Yoon (1989) intergrated both basalts as Eoil basaltic andesitic volcanic rocks or Eoil basalt (Yoon et al., 1991), and placed uppermost unit of the Changgi Group. As mentioned above the so-called Quarternary basalt in the Eoil basin are not extruded or intruaed simultaneously, but differentiatedly (14 Ma~25 Ma) so that they can not be classified as one unit. Fifthly, the Yongdong-ri formation of the Pomgogri Group is intruded by the Eoil basalt (911214-3) of 18.35~0.62 Ma age. Therefore, the deposition of the Pomgogri Group is completed before this age. Referring petrological characteristics, occurences, paleomagnetic data, and relationship to other Eoil basalts, it is most provable that this basalt is younger than two others. That means the Pomgogri Group is underlain by the Changgi Group. Sixthly, mineral composition of the basalts and andesitic rocks from the 4 basins show different ground mass and phenocryst. In volcanic rocks in the Pohang basin, phenocrysts are pyroxene and a small amount of biotite. Those of the Changgi basin is predominant by Labradorite, in the Eoil by bytownite-anorthite and a small amount pyroxene.

  • PDF