• 제목/요약/키워드: thoracic epidural analgesia

검색결과 28건 처리시간 0.025초

다발성 늑골골절 환자에서 흉부 경막외 차단중 발생한 심정지 -증례 보고- (Cardiac Arrest during Thoracic Epidural Blockade in the Patient with Multiple Rib Fractures -A case report-)

  • 배세관;이영복;윤경봉;임공빈
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.138-141
    • /
    • 1997
  • Rib fracture due to intense pain, may restrict patients from inadequate coughing. These conditions may produce varying degrees of complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and arterial hypoxemia. Thoracic epidural analgesia has been used to treat pain associated multiple rib fractures because of its marked improvement in vital capacity and dynamic lung compliance. However, there are complications related to thoracic epidural analgesia which may include damage to spinal cord, perforation of dura, respiratory depression, decrease heart rate and arterial blood pressure. We experienced such a case of cardiac arrest during thoracic epidural analgesia while treating a patient for multiple rib fractures.

  • PDF

개흉술 후 냉각요법과 경막외 Fentanyl 병용요법의 비교 (The Effect of the Combined Analgesia of Epidural and Cryoanalgesia after Thoracotomy Surgery)

  • 신진우;최인철;하승일;심지연;이청;박승일;윤창섭
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.68-75
    • /
    • 2001
  • Background: Thoracotomy is the operation that produces the most postoperative pain, necessitating the highest requirements for postoperative analgesics. The common methods of treating postthoracotomy pain are the use of thoracic epidural analgesia, intemittent or continuous intercostal nerve blocks, intravenous narcotics and cryoanalgesia. We designed to assess the analgesic effect of epidural analgesia, cryoanalgesia and the combined analgesia in thoracic surgery. Methods: A prospective study was carried out in 59 patients undergoing elective thoracotomy for parenchymal disease. Patients were randomized into three groups: C (cryoanalgesia), CE (cryoanalgesia and thoracic epidural analgesia), E (epidural analgesia). All patients had standard anesthesia with endotracheal intubation using a double lumen endotracheal tube, and one-lung ventilation. Subjective pain relief was assessed on a visual analog scale. Analgesic requirements, complications and the degree of satisfaction were evaluated during the 7 days following surgery. Results: Subjective pain relief was significantly better in Group CE and Group E in comparison with Group C (P < 0.05). Cryoanalgesia provided a better pain score on the 6th and 7th POD than the early postoperative periods. Analgesic requirements were higher in Group C than in the Group CE and Group E during the first POD. The incidence of side effects was similar in Group CE and Group E. Conclusions: If we can reduce the concentration of fentanyl and local anesthetics in combined analgesia of epidural and cryoanalgesia, the disadvantages of each method would be overcome and would be a better method of postthoracotomy pain control.

  • PDF

불안정형 협심증 환자의 고위 흉부 경막외 진통 효과 -증례보고- (High Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for the Control of Pain in Unstable Angina Pectoris -A case report-)

  • 이봉재
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.271-274
    • /
    • 2006
  • Unstable angina is a critical phase of coronary heart disease, with widely variable symptoms and prognoses. Recently, despite the advances in surgical revascularization, catheter-based revascularization and medical treatment, an increasing number of patients with angina pectoris are refractory to medical therapy and; therefore, can not be considered as candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting or interventional angioplasty. These patients are often treated with narcotics for pain relief, and forced to severely reduce their levels of activity and productivity. It has become clear that alleviating the pain caused by myocardial ischemia may be possible by altering the sympathetic afferent nerve fibers. Sympathetic blockade can be produced using high thoracic epidural analgesia. Herein, the case of a patient with intractable angina and poor ventricular function, who received high thoracic epidural analgesia to relieve ischemic chest pain, is reported.

경막외강 내 Meperidine 지속 주입에 의한 술 후 통증관리 (Postoperative Pain Control with Epidural Meperidine Infusion)

  • 임태하;최규택
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제19권2호
    • /
    • pp.192-196
    • /
    • 2006
  • Background: Epidural opioids are commonly used for postoperative analgesia. However, the side effects of epidural opioids include respiratory depression, sedation, pruritus, nausea, vomiting and urinary retention. Meperidine, due to its intermediate lipid solubility and local anesthetic properties, permits postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to compare meperidine alone to meperidine coupled with bupivacaine, and to determine the effects of epidural meperidine without bupivacaine, when used for epidural analgesia following hepatectomy abdominal surgery. Methods: Patients received thoracic epidural analgesia with meperidine alone (3.5 mg/ml in saline) or with additional bupivacaine (0.15%) for 2 days after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score 2 days after the operation, with the incidence and dose supplementation also evaluated. Postoperative side effects were assessed using a 3 grade system. Results: No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age and weight, or in the pain scores, side effects, incidence and dose supplementation. Conclusions: 3.5 mg/ml epidural meperidine at a dose of 2 ml/hr provides effective postoperative analgesia.

경막외강내 두측으로 10cm 삽입한 카테터의 X-선상 소견 (The Radiological Findings of the Catheters Inserted 10cm Cephaladly in Epidural Space)

  • 정소영;이효근;채진호;이철승;이철;김찬;김순열
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.298-303
    • /
    • 1995
  • We have inserted epidural catheter for single or continuous injection of a drug for epidural analgesia. It is important to localize the tip of epidural catheter in appropriate site to acquire the most effective analgesia. In epidural block, we observed course and location of the tip of epidural catheter. Subject: 70 patients were divided into group I(non-injection of saline group during catheter insertion) and group II(injection group during catheter insertion). Group I included cervical(n=20), thoracic(n=10), and lumbar(n=20) epidural group. Group II, cervical(n=10), and lumbar(n=10) epidural group. Method: 19G FlexTip $Plus^{TM}$ Epidural Catheter ($Arrow^{(R)}$) was inserted 10cm cephaladly in epidural space with(group II) or without(group I) saline flushing. We observed course and location of the tip of epidural catheter by C-arm image intensifier during injection of contrast media ($Omnipaque^{(R)}$). Result: In group I, the number of tips of epidural catheters located within 2 cm from inserted site were: cervical 14/20(70%), thoracic 2/10(20%). lumbar 16/20(80%). In thoracic epidural blocks, tips of epidural catheters were more cephaladly located than with cervical and lumbar epidural blocks. With cervical epidural blocks, the number of tips of epidural catheters located within 2 cm from insertion site were less in group II than group I (20% vs. 70%). But no significant differences were noted between group I and group II with lumbar epidural block(90% vs. 80%). The number of tips of epidural catheters located around a predicted site were: cervical 2/20(10%), thoracic 4/10(40%), lumbar 0/20(0%) in group I, and cervical 2/10(20%), lumbar 1/10(10%) in group II. Conclusion: It was impossible to predict the exact location of tips of epidural catheters by measuring the inserted length without epidurogram. With many cases, tips of epidural catheters were located around the insertion site in lumbar epidural blocks, and in some cases around the predicted site in thoracic epidural blocks. The results suggests that epidural block should be done at a point near the required band of analgesia.

  • PDF

폐암 환자에서 통증치료중 발생한 하지 마비 -증례 보고- (Lower Extremity Paralysis Developed during Pain Control in Lung Cancer Patient -A case report-)

  • 김홍범;송필오
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.439-442
    • /
    • 1996
  • Continuous epidural analgesia has been used widely for chronic pain control, especially in cancer patients. As one of the complications, paraplegia developed during continuous epidural analgesia may be caused by epidural abscess, epidural hematoma, neural damage, chronic adhesive arachnoiditis, anterior spinal artery syndrome, delayed migration of extradural catheter into subdural space or subarachnoid space and preexisting disease. A 55-years-old male with lung cancer was implanted with continuous thoracic epidural catheter for pain control. Twenty days after catheterization, moderate back pain, weakness of lower extremity and urinary difficulty were developed. We suspected epidural abscess at first and made differential diagnosis with MRI which showed metastatic cancer at T2-4 spine, And compressed spinal cord was the main cause of the lower extremity paralysis.

  • PDF

Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  • Hwang, Boo Young;Kwon, Jae Young;Jeon, So Eun;Kim, Eun Soo;Kim, Hyae Jin;Lee, Hyeon Jeong;An, Jihye
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제31권3호
    • /
    • pp.191-198
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is known to provide good postoperative analgesia in many types of surgery including laparoscopic surgery. However, no study has compared PCEA with patient-controlled intravascular analgesia (PCIA) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LARP). In this study, the efficacy and side effects of PCEA and PCIA after LARP were compared. Methods: Forty patients undergoing LARP were randomly divided into two groups: 1) a PCEA group, treated with 0.2% ropivacaine 3 ml and 0.1 mg morphine in the bolus; and 2) a PCIA group, treated with oxycodone 1 mg and nefopam 1 mg in the bolus. After the operation, a blinded observer assessed estimated blood loss (EBL), added a dose of rocuronium, performed transfusion, and added analgesics. The numeric rating scale (NRS), infused PCA dose, and side effects were assessed at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h. Results: EBL, added rocuronium, and added analgesics in the PCEA group were less than those in the PCIA group. There were no significant differences in side-effects after the operation between the two groups. Patients were more satisfied with PCEA than with PCIA. The NRS and accumulated PCA count were lower in PCEA group. Conclusions: Combined thoracic epidural anesthesia could induce less blood loss during operations. PCEA showed better postoperative analgesia and greater patient satisfaction than PCIA. Thus, PCEA may be a more useful analgesic method than PICA after LARP.

Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia (TEA) in Patients with Rib Fractures

  • Kim, Young-Jin;Cho, Hyun-Min;Yoon, Chee-Soon;Lee, Chan-Kyu;Lee, Tae-Yeon;Seok, June-Pill
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제44권2호
    • /
    • pp.178-182
    • /
    • 2011
  • Background: We analyzed the results of surgical reduction and fixation of ribs under thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia (TEA) in patients who had no more than 3 consecutive rib fractures with severe displacement to examine the clinical usefulness of this method. Materials and Methods: From May 2008 to March 2010, 35 patients underwent surgical reduction and fixation of ribs under TEA. We reviewed the indications for this technique, number of fixed ribs, combined surgical procedures for thoracic trauma, intraoperative cardiopulmonary events, postoperative complications, reestablishment of enteral nutrition, and ambulation. Results: The indications of TEA were malunion or nonunion of fractured ribs in 29 (82.9%; first operation) and incompletely ribs under previous general anesthesia in 6 (17.1%; second operation). The average number of fixed ribs per patient was 1.7 (range: 1~3). As a combined operation for thoracic trauma, 17 patients (48.6%) underwent removal of intrathoracic hematomas, and we performed repair of lung parenchyma (2), wedge resection of lung (1) for accompanying lung injury and pericardiostomy (1) for delayed hemopericardium. No patient had any intraoperative cardiopulmonary event nor did any need to switch to general anesthesia. We experienced 3 postoperative complications (8.6%): 2 extrapleural hematomas that spontaneously resolved without treatment and 1 wound infection treated with secondary closure of the wound. All patients reestablished oral feeding immediately after awakening and resumed walking ambulation the day after operation. Conclusion: Thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia (TEA) may positively affect cardiopulmonary function in the perioperative period. Moreover, this technique leads to an earlier return of gastrointestinal function and early ambulation without severe postoperative complications, resulting in a shortened hospital stay and lowered costs.

늑골골절 환자에서 지속적 경막외 신경차단에 의한 진통효과 (Effects Of Continuous Epidural Analgesia For Fractured Ribs)

  • 안상구;김재영
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제29권9호
    • /
    • pp.1017-1022
    • /
    • 1996
  • 늑골골절을 입은 환자들은 심한 흉통으로 괴로워하며 이 통증은 기침, 심호흡과 기도세척을 방해하여 결국 무기폐와 호흡부전등을 초래할 수 있다. 통증의 완화는 환자를 편하게 해주고 효과적인 물리요법으로 객담배출을 용이하게한다. 늑골골절 환자에서 경막외 신경차단의 효과를 측정하기 위하여 20명의 환자를 대상으로 경막외 진통제을 투여한 10명은 실험군, 진통제를 근육주사한 10명은 대조군으로 정하 여 통증호소와 운동장애의 정도, 말초동맥혈 산소분압 및 폐기능(FRC, FEVI)의 변화를 입원직후와 경막외 진통제투여 시작후 12, 24시간 및 3일, 5일 그리고 7일째에 각각측정조사 하였다. 신경차단군에서 통증호소와 운동장애의 정도는 감소하였고 동맥혈 산소치는 약간 증가하였으나 의의가 없었으며 FRC와 FEVI는 유의하게 증가하였다. 경막외 신경차단의 부작용은가벼웠으며 쉽게 치료되었다. 위의결과로 저자들은 늑골골절 환자에서 경막외 신경차단에 의한진통법이 동통완화효과와 폐기능 향상에 괄목할만한 효과을 나타내므로 이의 임상적 이용이 바람직하다고 생각한다.

  • PDF

경막외 진통법이 개흉술후 환자에게 미치는 영향 (Effect of Epidural Analgesia on the Post-thoracotomy Patient)

  • 이용재;신화균;김선한;권오춘;남충희;노중기;이길노;김영아;이장원;신형철;김일호;김순임;김선종;박욱
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-43
    • /
    • 1992
  • Postoperative hypoxemia in the absence of hypoventilation occurs more often after thoracic or upper abdominal surgery than lower abdominal operations or surgery on extremities. Although the factors which produce postoperative alveolar collapse have not been fully evaluated, the dominant factor of postoperative hypoxemia is shunt of blood passing collapsed alveoli and the postoperative pain is associated with restriction of depth of breathing, sighing and movement. In 1979, the first successful clinical usage of epidurally administered morphine for control of postoperative pain was reported by Behar and associates. This study was carried out for twenty patients who received posterolateral thoracostomy with bleb resection between May 1990 and May 1991 and who were primary spontaneous recurrent pneumothoraxes under general endotracheal anesthesia. For the relief of post-thoracotomy pain following of the general anesthesia, we selected ten patients as control group which were treated intermittently IM with injection of pethidine(50 mg) according to the conventional method and another ten patients as study group which were managed with thoracic epidural analgesia. The tip of the catheter was inserted to T4-5 epidural space through T12-L1 or L1-2 interspinous region before the induction of the general anesthesia and then the epidural analgesics(0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml+morphine 3 mg) was injected once a day via the catheter until 4 th POD in the study group. The epidural catheters were removed at postoperative 4 th day in study group. Clinical observations were done about vital signs, ABG, tidal volume, FVC and occurence of adverse effects during postoperative 2hr, 8hr, 1st day, 2nd day, 7th day in both groups. The results were as follows; (1) The values of $V_T$ and FVC were significantly improved in study group(85% and 66%) as compared with control group(76% and 61%) during the postoperative 4 day of the epidural analgesia. (2) After the end of the epidural analgesia(7th POD), the values of FVC were improved invertly rather in control group(98%) than study group(84%). It suggested that the reduction of FVC in study group were caused by the raised pain sensitivity following the end of epidural analgesia. (3) The side effects of epidural analgesia such as transient urinary retention(2 cases), itching sensation(1) and headache(1) were noted.

  • PDF