• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2021

Objectives : The theory of Latent Qi Wenbing and its counter-arguments were examined in terms of each argument's theoretical background and logicality. Methods :Arguments for and against the theory of Latent Qi Wenbing in medical texts were examined closely. Results & Conclusions : Each doctor's theory on Latent Qi Wenbing was examined in the following four aspects. First, to what kind of pathogenic qi was the patient exposed during Winter? Second, how did the pathogenic qi affect the body in the time of exposure? Third, how did the latent qi change over the Spring and Summer within the body? Fourth, what kind of weather generates the disease during Spring and Summer? Each argument had different opinions on each aspect. The main argument made against the theory of Latent Qi Wenbing is that it is impossible for the pathogenic qi that initially damaged the body to stay latent until it generates disease after some time. The theory of Latent Qi Wenbing could be assumed to have been created based on situations in which such explanation was adept. Factors that contribute to this theory could be explained through the condition of the healthy qi, state of cultivation during the past season, and constitutional factors.