• Title/Summary/Keyword: the standing water level control system

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

A Study on the economic analysis of the standing water level control system (SAL상수위 제어시스템의 경제성 분석에 관한 연구)

  • Hong, Jong-In;Hong, Seong-Wook;Kim, Sang-Won;Yang, Jin-Kook
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2013.05a
    • /
    • pp.281-283
    • /
    • 2013
  • In this paper, standing water level control system and a comparison of existing methods (anchor, PDD, DM) and economic analysis was conducted. 1) Cost PDD method (6%), DM system (4%), and the SAL standing water level control system (4%), except for the anchor system is similar to the construction of three methods based on the portion of the anchor system was analyzed that. 2) construction and maintenance costs compared with the sum of the partial was, anchor system (100%), PDD method (39%), DM system (37%), the SAL standing water level control system (21%), the SAL standing water level control system was identified as the lowest cost method of.

  • PDF

Effect of a Floating Photovoltaic System (FPV) at Chungju Dam (Cheongpung Lake) on Water Quality (충주댐(청풍호) 수상태양광 시설이 호수 수질에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Hak Jun;Kwak, Suhknam;Yoon, Min;Kim, Il-Kyu;Kim, Young-Sung;Kim, Dong-sub
    • Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment
    • /
    • v.52 no.4
    • /
    • pp.293-305
    • /
    • 2019
  • In this study we investigated the effect of a floating photovoltaic (FPV) system in Cheongpung Lake on water quality. The FPV with a tilt angle of 33° covered ca. 0.04% of surface area (97 ㎢) of Chungju Lake. The water qualities of the whole lake before and after installation of FPV were first compared. DO, BOD, TOC, and Chl-a of the whole lake were increased, while conductivity decreased after installation period at the significance level of 0.05. This change was probably due to the increased influx of nutrients by 40% resulting from increased precipitation during the same period. We also measured water quality parameters on May and Nov. 2017 at the FPV center (FPVC) and nearby control sites, and compared water quality. The result showed that the FPVC and nearby sites were not significantly different (p>0.05), demonstrating that the FPV does not cause a decline of water quality. The water temperature, light intensity, and phytoplankton community were also measured. The water temperature was not different between the sites, while the light intensity decreased to 27~50%. Despite reduced light intensity at FPVC, the phytoplankton standing crops and the number of species were not significantly different (p>0.05). However, in the early November samples, standing crops was significantly higher in FPVC than control with periphytic diatoms belonging to Aulacoseira genus being dominant. This may be due to the temporal water body behavior or local retention of current by FPV system. This study may provide a measure of future installation of a FPV system.