• 아동학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.57-71
• /
• 1997

This study discusses the nature of data-interpretation process in the perspective of modern hermeneutics and explores its methodological implications for qualitative research on the life of children. Discussions center around the basic concepts of modern hermeneutics, such as the conceptual distinctions between understanding and explanation, the intersubjective reality constituted between the child's horizon and the researcher's, the concept of the hermeneutics circle and the importance of the openness of language in understanding children's lifeworld. The conclusions are made as follows: First, the concept of "understanding", which is the basic concern of qualitative research on children, has a much different meaning from that of "explanation" in quantitative research. The task of understanding lies in interpreting the lived meaning in context as experienced by children in all its complexity. Second the researcher's subjectivity in the interpretation process has a dual function in that it can produce a faulty hermeneutics circle and yet it provides the researcher with the strong momentum to open up her understanding towards a deeper and wider level. Third, the reliability and the validity of qualitative research should be discussed within the interpretation process itself in that interpretation in qualitative research is guided basically by the researcher's internal dialectic: between data (text) and her subjectivity. Lastly, the language in interpretive research should be open and free in terms of style in order to present a fuller and richer description of children's lifeworld and the delicate textures of their lived meanings.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제63권3호
• /
• pp.261-283
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 조선 중종대의 빈곤과 구제가 어떻게 이루어졌는가를 이해하는 데 목적을 두고 이루어졌다. 조선시대에서도 중종대에 중점을 둔 것은 이 시기에 빈곤과 구제가 가장 빈번하게 일어나 사회복지적 함의가 깊고 풍부할 것으로 보았기 때문이다. 자료수집은 "중종실록"에 근거했고, 이를 분석하는데 유익한 해석학 관점을 적용했다. 연구결과에 따른 함의로, 1) 사회보장의 구체적인 방법들과 유사하게 부분적으로 시행된 점, 2) 구제대책이 왕의 절대권한으로 이루어진 점, 3) 구제를 위한 정치 경제 사회적 여건이 불충분했던 점, 4) 구제대책이 일시적이었던 점, 5) 빈곤의 책임을 왕과 신하가지며 자연에 순응하는 성향이 강했던 점을 도출했고, 이를 해석했다. 아울러 후속연구로 중종대 전후 왕대들 간 비교연구, "중종실록" 이외의 자료를 활용한 연구, 빈곤과 구제 이외에도 질병 및 범죄에 관한 연구가 필요함을 제언했다.

• 한국수학사학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 2014

This interdisciplinary study explores G$\ddot{o}$del's hermeneutics of the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy in terms of time. For G$\ddot{o}$del, Einstein's contribution to the physical realization of idealistic philosophy would be remarkable. We start with a historical background around G$\ddot{o}$del's paper for Einstein(1949a). From the perspective of G$\ddot{o}$del's cosmology, the second part addresses the relative nature of time, and the next then investigates the rotating model of universes. G$\ddot{o}$del's own results show that the temporal conditions of relativity and idealistic philosophy are satisfiable in the mathematical model of rotating universes. Thus, it could be asserted to travel into any region of the past, present or future, and back again.

• 조형예술학연구
• /
• 제9권
• /
• pp.25-47
• /
• 2006

예술의 이해에 가장 본질적인 태도를 제시했던 이들 가운데 예술학의 제창자인 데스와(Max Dessoir)는 일찍이 "예술이라는 위대한 사실이 함의하는 것들을 모든 방향에서 정당하게 다루어야 할 필요가 있다"고 하면서, 예술이 "인간의 인식활동과 의지활동" 모두에서 기여하기를 희망하였다. 그의 이와 같은 진술에 의거해 보자면, 예술을 사회 역사적으로 해석하되 그것이 인식론적으로 그리고 존재론적으로 타당성을 지닌 것이어야 한다는 것이다. 이러한 정위하여 두 관점이 공존하면서 사회 역사적 해석의 방법을 모색하는데 이 글의 목적이 있다. 이와 같은 목적으로부터 이해의 문제를 주된 연구 범위로 하는 해석학에 대한 고찰은 당연한 절차가 되는데, 이는 해석학이 고대 신탁에 대한 해명으로부터 성서 해석 및 현대의 복잡하고 다의적인 텍스트로서의 예술에 이르기까지 그 본직적인 의미뿐 아니라 존재의 이해를 시도하는 것을 본연의 과제로 삼는 까닭이다. 해석은 그것의 규준을 발견하려는 방법적인 기술학(記述學)을 발전시켜 왔으나, 현대적인 의미에서 해석학은 그러한 방법적 발전보다는 인간 존재의 이해로 전환되어 가고 있다. 이에 대해 리쾨르(Paul Ricoeur)는 해석학이 '인식론'에서 '존재론'으로의 이해했다고 주장하였다. 그러나 해석 대상과 저자의 의도에 보다 충실해온 인식론적 관점과 해석 대상과 해석 주체와의 지평 융합에 의한 존재론적 관점은 우열을 가릴 수 없는 것임에도 불구하고, 두 관점은 각각 독립적인 성격만을 부각되어 배타적인 관계로 간주되어왔다. 이로부터 이 글은 두 관점의 상격만이 부각되어 배타적인 관계로 간주되어 왔다. 이로부터 이 글은 두 관점의 상호 의존적인 관계를 조명함으로써 이것에 의해 해석이 보다 충실해질 수 있음을 주장한다. 이와 같은 의도로부터 두 관점 모두를 상호 의존적인 해석의 절차로 수용하려는 방법적인 개념으로, '귀속'과 '순환'을 제기하였다. 이 두 개념은 해석의 과정에서 그 대상과 그로부터 발생하는 인간 이해의 문제를 밝히는데 상호 의존적이고 상호 보완적으로 작용하여 사회 역사적 해석에 도달하게 하는 구체적 전략이 되기 때문이다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제17권
• /
• pp.93-112
• /
• 2004

This article examines the process of how Daesoon thought keeps its own identity while being practiced as a religion in Korean culture through the perspective of theological hermeneutics of E. Schillebeeckx, a representative theologian in 20th century, especially on the centering of the matter of experience. Schillebeeckx says that an experience is an occurrence of perception by encountering something different from oneself. According to him, 1) the occurrence of perception is premised on a framework or form of interpretation which prescribes experience as the experience in the perceptive dimension. 2) A framework of interpretation is subject to pre-existing system or structure which already has formed a basis to the experience. It consists of various interpretative elements such as social form, general knowledges, various experiences, theoretical models in their society, etc.. 3) The experiences take place in the reflection of contemporary situation, and it is understood by a society, thus making it a social stream. This experience is expressed historically, gains historicity in the process of being handed down from person to person, from generation to generation. In this way, an experience starts to form a tradition. 4) The tradition is a historical stream which gives rise to, admits, and integrates various experiences, religious revelation, and faith etc. In this way, the tradition as a historical stream becomes a field of religious actuality such as revelation, salvation, etc. Conclusively, a religion takes place, is formed, only when it is understood anew by the people who live in that cultural tradition through their languages. The ground Daesoon thought takes place, is formed, is in this way. Daesoon thought takes place in the core of traditional Korean culture, undergoes changes when it encounters the other stream of traditional Korean culture, and the vice versa. Because of this inevitable change, ironically enough, Daesoon thought can maintain its own identity as Daesoon thought, and Korean culture its own identity as Korean culture, avoiding falling into the tertiary which is neither Daesoon thought nor Korean culture. It is in this way that any religion can be in the faithfulness to its starting point to be enriched and transformed in its interaction with the other tradition. At here is the reason Daesoon thought has to have an openness to the changing world.

• Human Ecology Research
• /
• 제51권6호
• /
• pp.649-663
• /
• 2013

As cultural diversity has gained a great deal of attention and the social fabric of Korean society is redefined, the number of studies on multi-cultural family homes has been growing in the area of human ecology, but relevant research is rarely found on the subject of housing. While the emphasis of housing research is on multidisciplinary approaches and empirical research is highly valued, a theoretical and methodological platform for discussing the new rising agenda of multi-cultural family homes is lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore approaches to and to discuss the issues in research for multi-cultural family homes in terms of housing theories and multidisciplinary approaches. To understand the housing related needs of multi-cultural families, this study highlights social constructionism, the ecological perspective, and feminist epistemology. These three multidisciplinary approaches were useful for generating an ontological analysis of multi-cultural family homes. Further, this study highlights two housing related theories, the microsociological and housing pathways approaches, for dealing with multi-cultural family homes. In conclusion, the five approaches were useful for exploring issues in housing research on multi-cultural family homes with appropriate research methods like hermeneutics, quantitative, and qualitative methods, and field research. Insights into using perspectives and holistic approaches might be useful for solving the problems of multi-cultural family homes in Korea.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.103-111
• /
• 2016

This paper investigates the characteristics of preservation of Korean modern architecture through Western historic preservation theories and philosophies. This research focuses on the Japanese Government-General of Korea (1926-1995) which was built in 1926 and used as the chief administrative building in Seoul (Keijo in Japanese) during the Japanese colonial period (1910-1945). After Korea was liberated from Japanese rule in 1945, this building was used until 1995 for the South Korean National Assembly, the United States Army Military Government in Korea, and the National Museum of South Korea. Although it served a variety of roles, this building was the most controversial case of historic preservation in Korean modern architecture. To analyze the peculiarities and characteristics of Korean modern architecture and its preservation, this research applied Western historic preservation theories, not exclusively from classical historic preservation theories developed by Viollet-le-Duc and John Ruskin, but also from modern historic preservation theories by Theodore H. M. Prudon, Daniel Blunstone, and Frances A. Yates. This cross-cultural and comparative study of historic preservation helps identify Korean modern architecture's characteristics. It can also be a useful reference in finding the origins of Korean modern architectural identity.