• 한국교육논총
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.183-213
• /
• 2022

들뢰즈와 가타리가 제기하는 느리고, 경험적인 교육은 시간 속에서 반복되는 지속을 경험해야만 가능하다. 잠재성과 현실성의 짝으로 이루어진 이 세계의 주체성은 '기계'로 표현된다. '기계'의 주체성은 생성 자체이다. 클라우드 상 어디에나 존재하면서 무의식적으로 빅데이터를 수집하는 정보사회의 주체성 또한 정보사회 자체이다. 정보사회는 개인의 욕망을 주체성의 발현에 앞서 관리하는 사회로 기울 위험을 안고 있다. '기계'는 언표적 배치와 기계적 배치로 이루어져 있다. 배치론에 입각한 사회과학은 반복되는 패턴, 언어성과 물질성의 공존, 경계에 대한 주의, 총체적 전체에 대한 부정이라는 특징을 공유한다. 시간 속에서 집합적 패턴이 구조적으로 변형되어 가는 양상을 띠는 배치의 교육학은 들뢰즈와 가타리의 본래 문제의식인 느리고, 경험적인 교육에 부합한다. 또, '교육-기계'의 물질성과 언표성을 고찰하는 작업은 탈인간 시대의 새로운 학습론, 교육론 확립에 기여할 것이다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제9권12호
• /
• pp.253-260
• /
• 2009

세계대전 이후 유럽경제는 경제회복과 국가이익을 위해 산업과 기업을 국영화하면서 파생된 문제점의 대안으로, 황금주가 영국을 비롯하여 유럽의 많은 나라에 널리 퍼지게 되었다. 그러나 영국 등 유럽 여러 나라에서 채택한 황금주가 유럽재판소에서 "자본이동의 자유"를 침해한다는 이유로 부정적인 판결을 받았다. 그러나 최근 프랑스와 독일에서 중동이나 아시아국가의 풍부한 자금으로부터 국가의 전략적 회사의 적대적 매수로부터 보호하기 위하여 황금주를 적극적으로 고려하고 있다. 이러한 세계경제의 흐름에서 보면, 우리나라 역시 현실을 직시하면 원시정관이나 대다수 주주의 동의 등 기존주주의 보호를 전제로 매우 엄격한 요건을 갖추어 도입하도록 하여야 할 것이다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.68-80
• /
• 2013

This study is about expressive aspects of subversive mimesis found in architectural design under 2nd Modernity. Architectural works under 2nd Modernity are described based on pseudo-scientific positivism and philosophical ontology of Deleuze. However, subversiveness found in works of arts by architects such as Rem Koolhaas present a few complexities to relay on such a description. This is about 'subversiveness' which absorbs the positive and negative factors of modernity which has been multi-layered as 'cultural capital'. This study aims to identify meta-phenomenon as well as the specific correlations between expression and purposes of any work of art that is presented in the form of subversiveness. To achieve this aim, this study approached with the concepts of appropriation and detournment based on Adorno's subversive mimesis concept. Meta-phenomena of architectural design methods occur from relations of three, which are social reality, artist, and work of art. This was connected to productivity of mimesis practice of self-reference and self-examination, which was then, summed up from the perspectives of appropriation in pure arts and d$\acute{e}$tournment of situationalists. Based on this work, subversive expressive characteristics of architecture under 2nd Modernity were framed from the perspectives of the absorption of cultural capital, reflection and negation, autonomy, instrumentality, and meta properties. In this way, this study found that Adorno's subversiveness should be effective for creative and methodological systemization in terms of interpretation of cognition, practice, and effect after materialization.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.37-56
• /
• 2006

Introducing International Style, P. Johnson and H. R. Hitchcock gave three standards to be the Modern, volume and surface, regularity, and exclusion of applied decoration. In spite of the negation of stylistic, formal approach in the Modernist Manifestoes, one usually have understood Modernity in Architecture with its formal character, especially with no ornament and flat, abstract, white surface. Modernism as a new paradigm in architecture have emphasized that there is no representation of anything outside and only present architecture in itself. They said that Modernism only cared about the language of Architecture without figural reference. So apparently there is no way to prove to its Modernity with formal condition. Modernity is in Spirit and contents. But actually we understand well its existence by visual communication This study deals with this difficult situation how Modernity represents itself without visual media and asks the question how simultaneously it presents its thingness and materiality In order to analyse contradictory situation between representation and presentation in Modern Architecture we need to survey the historical process of changing position of ornaments and its meaning in time. With the crisis of representation the role of ornament have seriously changed and divided. It caused the two situation in pre-Modern Architecture. Firstly, Architecture tend to be a high art and formal expression became important much more. The Use of Ornament became a kind of fashion to show the power, class, money. Secondly, Ornament lost its cultural weight and the structure and material aspect became the central in architecture. Rational Structuralism would be the essential character in Modern Architecture. Here the theory of G. Semper and A. Loos on cladding(dressing) and Ornament can help its problems and limits. In the situation without conventional ornament Modernists need to present modernity with new media that only show the thing itself and by that it does not represent any thing else as like the value, idea outside buildings. They believed that only it concerned esthetics and morality in architecture. But in reality it referred to art and machines as like ships, aircraft, and cars. By excluding Ornament and showing the process of clearing, abstract, flat, white surface 'represent' Modernity by the indirect way referring the concept of transparency, reason, sanitation, tectonics, etc. An Ideology and myth intervened architectural discourse to make the doxa about the representation in Architecture. Surface must be a different kind of media and message that can communicate in different way with compared to conventional Ornament. Decorated Shed by R. Venturi and Post-Functionalism by P. Eisenman, that are the most famous post-modern discourse, shows well difficult and contradictory condition in contemporary architecture concerning representation and form, meaning and form.