• Title/Summary/Keyword: the factor of poor progress in reading

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

An Analysis of the Critical factors Making Koreans Poor Readings (한국인의 독서부진 요인분석에 관한 연구)

  • 박정길
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.34 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-77
    • /
    • 2003
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the critical factors that have made Koreans such poor readers. What is the factors in make poor progress in reading of the Korean. The emphasis was put on identifying some indigenous barriers against buiding ‘good’ reading habits. Especially investigated are the following three aspects: historical, socio-educational, and psychological. This study suggested the policies and strategies for correcting and improving the poor reading of Korean.

  • PDF

A Study on the Solution to the Problem of University Students Poor Readings (대학생 독서부진 해결방안에 대한 연구)

  • Park, Jeong-Gill
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.37 no.4
    • /
    • pp.3-20
    • /
    • 2006
  • The purpose of this study is on the solution of the problem that have made university students poor readings. What is the factors in make poor progress in reading of the university students. This study suggested the policies and strategies for correcting and improving the poor reading of university students. Especially in this study, it is necessary to establish the reading philosophy of the university students. That is the presentation of reading certification and the credit system of reading in educational system and in reading guidance.

  • PDF

Study on Image Quality Assessment in Whole Body Bone Scan (전신 뼈검사에서의 영상 평가 연구)

  • Kwon, Oh Jun;Hur, Jae;Lee, Han Wool;Kim, Joo Yeon;Park, Min Soo;Roo, Dong Ook;Kang, Chun Goo;Kim, Jae Sam
    • The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.30-36
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose Whole body bone scan, which makes up a largest percentage of nuclear medicine tests, has high sensitivity and resolution about bone lesion like osteomyelitis, fracture and the early detection of primary cancer. However, any standard for valuation has not yet been created except minimum factor. Therefore, in this study, we will analysis the method which show a quantitative evaluation index in whole body bone scan. Materials and Methods This study is conducted among 30 call patients, who visited the hospital from April to September 2014 with no special point of view about bone lesion, using GE INFINIA equipment. Enumerated data is measured mainly with patient's whole body count and lumbar vertabrae, and the things which include CNR (Contrast to Noise ratio), SNR (Signal to Noise ratio) are calculated according to the mean value signal and standard deviation of each lumbar vertabrae. In addition, the numerical value with the abdominal thickness is compared to each value by the change of scan speed and tissue equivalent material throughout the phantom examination, and compared with 1hours deleyed value. Completely, on the scale of ten, 2 reading doctors and 5 skilled radiologists with 5-years experience analysis the correlation between visual analysis with blind test and quantitative calculation. Results The whole body count and interest region count of patients have no significant correlation with visual analysis value throughout the blind test(P<0.05). There is definite correlation among CNR and SNR. In phantom examination, Value of the change was caused by the thickness of the abdomen and the scan speed. And The poor value of the image in the subject as a delay test patient could be confirmed that the increase tendency. Conclusion Now, a standard for valuation has not been created in whole body bone scan except minimum factor. In this study, we can verify the significant correlation with blind test using CNR and SNR and also assure that the scan speed is a important factor to influence the imagine quality from the value. It is possible to be some limit depending on the physiology function and fluid intake of patient even if we progress the evaluation in same condition include same injection amount, same scan speed and so on. However, that we prove the significant evaluation index by presenting quantitative calculation objectively could be considered academic value.

  • PDF