• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.171-196
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 현행 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정을 비교 분석하여서 시대의 변화에 따라 도서관 업무도 변하고 그와 관련된 문헌정보와 교과과정도 변하는 모습을 보도록 하여 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과 과정이 이론보다 실무연습에 강조되어야 할 필요성이 있음을 알게 하는 것이다. 이렇게 하기 위해서는 도서관 현장에서 요구되는 새로운 지식을 파악하기 위한 문헌조사와 국내 전문대학 문헌정보과의 교과과정을 비교·분석하여 공통교과목을 도출하며 새로운 모형교과과정표를 작성하는 것이다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.71-120
• /
• 1983

In this study, a model curriculum for the Library and Information Science programs in Junior Colleges is presented by comparing those curricula of the Republic of Korea, the United States of America, England and Japan. In Korea, 80 credits are required for graduate of Junior College and 60 credits of that total credits are for major courses. At Toshokan Danki Daikagu in Japan, 73 credits are opened for the Department of Library Science and 87 credits for the Department of Library and Information Science respectively. In the United States of America, 30 credits for major courses out of 90 total credits are opened at Lansing Community College and 24 credits for major courses out of 60-64 credits at Mesa Community College distinctively. On the basis of the various analyses, the following principles are applied in designning the model curriculum; (1) Possibly 3 credits per subject are assigned, (2) Major credits for graduate are 60-64 credits including possible optional subjects, (3) 20 percents of those 60-64 credits shall be applied for electives, so that 72-78 credits are assigned for major, (4) In order to combine theory and practice, and to select practice areas as required major, the ratio between required and elective must be adjusted, (5) In order to avoid duplication of subject, adequate individuality must be provided, (6) The Information Science areas must be dealt with in Library Science since computer systems are being rapidly adopted in libraries and the education for resources of materials and foreign languages are also important for successful fulfillment of mediator's roles between materials and users. Therefore the following model curriculum is suggested; 31 credits in 11 subjects for required major, 46 credits in 18 subjects for electives in major, total 77 credits for 29 subjects are established, and it includes such areas as material organization, foreign languages, resources of materials, library management, information science, fundamental studies, services and practice.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.21-45
• /
• 2000

본 연구의 목적은 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정의 새 모형안을 개발하는데 있다. 개발하기 위한 이유로는 시대의 변화에 따라 도서관 업무도 변하고 그와 관련된 문헌정보과 교과과정도 변해야 할 필요성이 있으며, 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정은 이론보다 실무연습이 강조되어야 할 필요성이 있기 때문이다. 새로운 교과과정을 개발하기 위한 방안으로 첫째, 도서관 현장에서 요구되는 새로운 지식을 파악하기 위해 문헌조사 및 도서관 현직사서와의 면담을 통하여 준사서의 업무를 파악하고 둘째로 문헌정보과 교수, 도서관 관리책임자 및 도서관 현직 준사서들에게 설문지를 배포하여 의견을 수렴함으로서 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정에 새롭게 포함되어야 할 교과목을 선정하였다. 설문지 문항은 총30개로 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정에 관련된 일반적인 사항과 시대적인 변화에 따른 준사서의 업무 및 준사서의 일상적인 업무들로 구분되었다. 5단계 리커트 척도를 사용하여 측정하고 조사결과는 SAS(Statistical Analysis System)를 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석한 연구결과는 첫째, 문헌조사 및 현직사서와의 면담을 통하여 얻어진 준사서의 업무가 전산화 이전의 전통적인 도서관 업무와 전산화 이후의 자동화된 도서관 업무로 구분되어서 앞으로의 도서관 업무는 전자도서관 형태로 변모되어질 것을 예고하여주고 있으며 둘째, 설문지를 통한 분석결과로서, 준사서의 일상적인 업무들에 관련된 설문들에서는 도서관실습 교과목이 으뜸(4.19)을 나타내는 것은 전문대학 문헌정보과 교과과정은 실습위주로 구성되어야 함을 나타내며 준사서는 실습위주로 교육해야함을 타나낸 것이다. 교과과정에서 교과목의 변천은 급진적이 아니라 점진적이라는 것과 새로운 교과과정에 포함되어야 할 교과목들은 전자도서관실습, 정보시스템(론), 데이터베이스(론), 정보네트워크실습 등으로 정보시스템 영역이 강조되어야 한다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.213-276
• /
• 1990

To revise and develop a 'Model' Curriculum for training the middle standing professionals equipped with professional technology and theories at the spot of the library, such process were executed as research on bibliographic material and literature, utilization of examination of various questionnaires, interviews with middle standing librarians at the spot of the library, a review on the operational state of the Professor's Association of Library Science of Junior Colleges, some consultation with the Research & Deliberation Committee on Curriculums, etc., and to review the present department of library science at the two-year course's short-term colleges or institutes in foreign countries, Germany which is thought to be similar to our nation's situations and its level of economy and Singapore which is considered to be a newly emerging nation were looked into typically. In particular, since studies on the curriculums of the Library Science Dept. of colleges had already preceded, thereby the framework of the 'Model' curriculum was already achieved, however to review how well such framework is applied to the spot of education and give some improvement on that, some unrelistic findings of different subjects in consideration with reality, while comparing those curriculum schedules of each Library Science Dept. with the 'Model' curriculum schedule, were supplemented or revised to be fit to reality. For some supplementing or revising proposals on the pre studied 'Model' curriculum, some tentative plans which focussed on each field respectively and some tentative plans which focussed on cultural subjects, required major subjects and elective subjects were suggested in duality to be referred to. On such a process of forming a harmony of educational theories and practice, it was planned to revise and develop curriculum in a sense emphasizing on practical exercise, and tried not to neglect on each of the fields of the curriculum centered on the areas of materials organization, linguistics, information resource, information science, library organization, & administration, etc. The study on curriculums should be performed flexible to be applied to the accelerating transition of sciences, and be good examples in instruction.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제25권
• /
• pp.185-213
• /
• 1993

This study is on the history of classification in Western library from ancient to Harris(1870), before Dewey. It looks into the classification systems of librarians, bibliographers, booksellers and libraries of that time. One of the earliest was the classification of the clay tablets in the Assyrian library of Assurbanipal. But the earliest recorded system in the papyrus is that which Callimachus(B.C. 310-240) devised for the library at Alexandria. In the medival, the monastry libraries used many classifications. but their libraries were very small. Gesner, Naude, Brunet, Jefferson, Edwards, Harris etc. tried to make a good classification for bibliographies and libraries. Especially Brunet made the scheme based on the French system, and it used on bibliographical classification and shelf classification in the many libraries. In 1859, Edwards made the classification scheme for the public library in the Great Britain. In 1870, Harris made the famous inverted Baconian classification and it strongly influenced the Dewey Decimal Classification.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.3-37
• /
• 1983

1. Library practice education in Korea is in the form of field experience, that is, Practicum, which is one type of field experience. 2. The practicum is a short-term work experience guided by the academic institutions. (2 to 6 weeks of full time employment in a library, or one to two semesters of approximately 10 to 12 hours weekly) 3. Field work is largely accepted as a required subject. 4. Field work is usually carried out during the first semester of senior year. (or of sophomore year in junior college) 5. Libraries in other universities (or in other institutions) can beused for a student's field work. But the current tendency is to use his or her own university's library. 6. Most universities give one credit for 2 weeks' field work. 7. The method of evaluation is strict: A or 'excellent' (above 90), B or 'good' (above 80), C or 'fair' (above 70), D or 'bad' (above 60). 8. The expense of field work is usually included in the tuition fees. However, some think that an additional fees should be collected in the case of special practice. 9. Respondents to my survey say that the field experience is necessary so that professional librarians can connect theory and practice. 10. They also indicate that there are some problems in library practice education: administrative difficulties in the department chairman's office, the burden on professors in the library being used, and the limited number of libraries in which the field work is practicable. 11. The Department of Library Science is responsible primarily for providing faculty supervision over the students, and secondarily for the preparation of evaluation cards and field work reports. 12. Most of the faculty respondents use evaluation cards for the field work, some of which serve as grade sheets, some as field work diaries, and some as field work reports.