• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.29-37
• /
• 2009

As with the January 2005 amendment of the Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure, schools are now included in the scope of privately-funded infrastructure projects. According to the announcement made by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in 2007, a total of 1.1 billion-won stimulus package has been proposed and is being implemented to operate private investments in social infrastructure helping to secure sufficient educational facilities for a period of five years from 2005 to 2010. Private participation offers first-priority infrastructure in a timely manner, raises efficiency with creative project conception and design, and stimulates economy by tapping into unemployed fund. This study limited its scope to new school construction projects in Gyeonggi Province which have been implemented via BTL system since January 2005. And using field-inspection and interview techniques, the study proposed improvement schemes applicable to the field. The results will be fully incorporated into new school construction projects to be carried out in the future, to help build creative learning space-student-oriented quality structures-where in Korea's leaders of the 21st century knowledge-based society will be educated.

• 한국전자통신학회논문지
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.679-686
• /
• 2013

민간투자사업은 정부에는 민간의 자본과 기술을 도입하고 민간은 정부의 공공재를 안정적으로 사용하여 수익을 창출할 수 있다는 상호이익으로 인하여 계속 활성화되고 있다. 국제적으로는 1980년대, 우리나라의 경우 1990년에 들어 도로, 철도, 항만, 공항 등의 사회간접시설(SOC) 사업이 증가하였다. 본 연구는 민간투자사업의 기본이 되는 민간투자법의 전반적인 부분을 고찰하고 쟁점 사항에 대한 개선방향을 도출함으로써 "민간의 투자를 촉진하고 국민경제 발전에 이바지 한다"는 민간투자법의 목적을 합리적으로 달성하고자 한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 1th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.353-359
• /
• 2005

The infrastructure in korea has been improved drastically since July 7th, 1970 which was the first highway completed date in Korea (Seoul-Pusan). This is one of the major factors for the competitiveness of a country. Now the total length of highway in Korea is more than 2000km. However Korea is 11th in the trade volume in the world, the SOC level of Korea is around 20th at most in the world (IMD 2004). The infrastructure in Korea comparing other developed countries is far below, which gives the impact of cost of goods, even twice expensive in transporting goods through highways, railways and ports etc. Now the government budget is gradually spending more for welfare and health care side. The most of additional expense of welfare is increasing rather than SOC budget is decreasing or staying as it is as 2003. The government may think that the level of SOC is enough in point of view of preference input of budget such as welfare and health care etc. However the SOC level in Korea is far form the competitiveness of the country. The main points of this paper is to show that where Korea is in point of SOC level to go for developed country, and what to do to facilitate BOT, BTO and BTL projects. Korean government has tried to improve the practice of PPI (Private Participation of Infrastructure) with the Act on Private Capital Inducement in 1994 and the Act on Private Investment in 1997.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2006년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.310-316
• /
• 2006

Since 'Act on Private Participation in Infrastructure' were changed in January 2005, BTL(Build-Transfer-Lease) projects of Private Participation in Infrastructure was introduced in the domestic construction market for the purpose of providing public facilities with the public. Selecting the most qualified Promoter should be considered discreetly in BTL projects because BTL projects is for projects with approximately thirty year project life cycle, plan, construction, operating, maintenance and obviously the success of the project totally depends on the capability and role of Promoter. However, score for cost is likely to influence selecting Promoter to take the project. Accordingly, low bid contract with too much competition could decrease the quality of the construction plan and operating plan. Thus, this study did preliminary research and documents on problems of evaluation criteria for selecting Promoter in BTL projects, and proposed improvement factors by doing questionnaire over specialists of each field.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.121-131
• /
• 2006

2005년 1월 사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자법 개정으로 공공서비스시설을 국민들에게 제공할 수 있는 새로운 민간투자방식인 BTL민간투자사업(Build-Transfer-Lease)이 국내건설시장에 도입하게 되었다. BTL사업은 설계, 시공, 운영 및 유지관리까지 포함하여 최장 30여년 이상의 프로젝트 수명주기 전 과정을 대상으로 하는 포괄적인 형태의 사업방식으로 사업자의 역할과 수행능력 여하에 따라 사업의 성패가 좌우됨으로 최적 사업시행자의 선정이 중요하다 그러나 BTL사업의 사업시행자 선정시 가격평가점수에 따라 많은 영향을 받아 최저가 투찰로 인하여 우수한 기술능력을 갖춘 사업시행자보다 최저가격을 제안한 사업시행자가 선정 될 수 있는 가능성이 높아 건설계획 운영계획 유지관리측면 등에서 품질수준이 저하될 우려가 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 따라서 본 연구는 BTL사업의 사업시행자 선정을 위한 평가기준의 문제점을 분석하고 전문가 설문조사를 통하여 개선방향을 모색하여 평가기준 개선방안을 제안하였다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2007년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.917-920
• /
• 2007

우리나라의 민간투자 사업은 잦은 제도변경으로 많은 혼란을 격고 있지만, 2005년 1월 사회기반시설의 민간투자법 개정으로 공공서비스시설을 대중에게 제공할 수 있는 새로운 민간투자방식은 BTL(Build Transfer Lease)이 국내건설시장에 도입되었다. BTL사업은 계획에서 유지관리까지 사업의 수명주기 전 과정을 대상으로 포괄적 형태의 사업을 수행하는 것으로 사업자의 역할과 수행능력에 따라 사업의 성패가 좌우 된다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 효율적인 BTL사업의 추진에 필요한 명확한 시스템 기준을 분석하여 사업수행의 정확성을 검증할 수 있는데 그 목적이 있다.

• 한국보건교육건강증진학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국보건교육건강증진학회 2005년도 국민건강증진법 제정 10주년 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.153-195
• /
• 2005

There has been 10 years since The Health Promotion Act was legislated. The government began to establish a health promotion fund on the basis of Health Promotion Act in 1995, and to manage and operate the fund from 1998. It is evaluated that health promotion program have had various outcomes in many aspects. First, there has been growing awareness of the impotance of health promotion through the establishment of Health Plan 2010 and the effort to actualize the Plan. Second, the importance of securing health equity and identifying health determinants have been recognized during the planning process of Health Plan 2010. Third, the health promotion program have mainly focused on improving healthy life style of the population. As a result, desirable health behavior change of the population could be expected from the result of 2005 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Fourth, public health centers began to play a crucial role in implementing health promotion programs, and began to build infrastructure for health promotion programs. Fifth, the outcomes of health promotion programs by public health centers and private health organizations have been increasing. Finally, training for health promotion personnel and their participation in the program could be the foundation for the higher level of outcome achievement from the health promotion programs. Important challenges for future health promotion would be identification of the determinants and risk factors of health in Korea, establishment of local health promotion plan, building infrastructure for health promotion, creation of specific action model by public health center, development of diverse health promotion programs and health promotion program for the elderly, conducting research for evidence concerning major factors reducing the need for health care through prevention disease activities, and establishment of evaluation and feed back system for health promotion programs.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.143-171
• /
• 2006

There has been 10 years since the Health Promotion Act was legislated. The government began to establish a health promotion fund on the basis of Health Promotion Act in 1995, and to manage and operate the fund from 1998. It is evaluated that health promotion program have had various outcomes in many aspects. First, there has been growing awareness of the impotance of health promotion through the establishment of Health Plan 2010 and the effort to actualize the Plan. Second, the importance of securing health equity and identifying health determinants have been recognized during the planning process of Health Plan 2010. Third, the health promotion program have mainly focused on improving healthy life style of the population. As a result, desirable health behavior change of the population could be expected from the result of 2005 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Fourth, public health centers began to play a crucial role in implementing health promotion programs, and began to build infrastructure for health promotion programs. Fifth, management efficiency of private health related organizations have been improved. Finally, training for health promotion personnel and their participation in the program could be the foundation for the higher level of outcome achievement from the health promotion programs. Important challenges for future health promotion would be identification of the determinants and risk factors of health, formulating plan of regional health promotion programs, building infrastructure for health promotion, creation of specific action model by public health center, development of health promotion program for the elderly, conducting research for evidence concerning major factors reducing the need for health care through prevention disease activities, and establishment of evaluation and feed back system for health promotion programs.