• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.208-217
• /
• 2018

상악 전치부는 심미적으로 민감한 부위이며, 치아 외형과 치은의 조화도 치료의 성공과 밀접한 관련이 있다. 이를 위해서는 정확한 진단과 치료계획이 필수적이며, 필요 시 치아 주위 연조직에 대한 처치 등이 동반될 수 있다. 연조직 처치로서 외과적 치관연장술 중 하나인 치은절제술을 고려할 수 있으며 이를 통해 심미적인 보철 수복을 할 수 있다. 상악 전치부는 심미뿐 아니라 기능 또한 고려하여야 한다. 지대치 주모형과 순측만을 수정한 진단 납형 모형을 스캔 및 중첩하여 디자인 및 가공하면, 최소한의 교합조정을 통해 기존의 편안했던 교합을 재현해 줄 수 있다. 본 증례에서는 치은절제술 및 모형 중첩을 통해 심미 수복을 진행하였고, 그 결과 심미와 기능모두에서 환자의 만족도를 높였기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

• 제어로봇시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.254-257
• /
• 2011

This study was performed to development a dental three-dimensional laser scanning system and measure the accuracy of new adjustable lower dental impression trays. Multiple impressions of a resin master model were made with custom, stock and new adjustable trays and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. The lower master model and resulting cast were compared using an dental scanning system. Each 3D image was superimposed onto the lower master model image and analyzed with custom software. Multiple measurements of the lower master model and casts were analyzed to determine the accuracy of tray types.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.279-285
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. The aim of this clinical study was to assess the accuracy of the implants placed using a universal digital surgical guide. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Among 17 patients, 28 posterior implants were included in this study. The digital image of the soft tissue acquired from cast scan and hard tissue from CBCT have been superimposed and planned the location, length, diameter of the implant fixture. Then digital surgical guides were created using 3D printer. Each of angle deviations, coronal, apical, depth deviations of planned and actually placed implants were calculated using CBCT scans and casts. To compare implant positioning errors by CBCT scans and plaster casts, data were analyzed with independent samples t-test. RESULTS. The results of the implant positioning errors calculated by CBCT and casts were as follows. The means for CBCT analyses were: angle deviation: $4.74{\pm}2.06^{\circ}$, coronal deviation: $1.37{\pm}0.80mm$, and apical deviation: $1.77{\pm}0.86mm$. The means for cast analyses were: angle deviation: $2.43{\pm}1.13^{\circ}$, coronal deviation: $0.82{\pm}0.44mm$, apical deviation: $1.19{\pm}0.46mm$, and depth deviation: $0.03{\pm}0.65mm$. There were statistically significant differences between the deviations of CBCT scans and cast. CONCLUSION. The model analysis showed lower deviation value comparing the CBCT analysis. The angle and length deviation value of the universal digital guide stent were accepted clinically.